Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21740 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1943
CRL.MC NO. 3808 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 430/2018 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II,
KASARAGOD, KASARGOD
PETITIONER/ACCUSED Nos. 1 TO 3:
1 UMARUL FAROOK
AGED 32 YEARS
S/O.AHAMMED KUNHI, RESIDING AT KOLLADUKKA HOUSE, KUMBADAJE(P.O),
KASARAGOD DISTRICT,PIN-671551.
2 ABDULLAKUNHI.K,
AGED 45 YEARS
S/O.AHAMMED KUNJI, RESIDING AT KOLLADUKKA HOUSE, KUMBNADAJE(P.O),
KASARAGOD DISTRICT-671551.
3 KHALID.K,
AGED 40 YEARS
S/O.AHAMMED KUNHI, RESIDING AT KOLLADUKA HOUSE,
KUMBADAJE(P.O), KASARAGOD DISTRICT,PIN-671551.
BY ADV JAWAHAR JOSE
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT-STATE, DEFACTO COMPLAINANT & INJURED:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
KERALA,ERNAKULAM-682031.
2 ASHIF ABDULLA
AGED 25 YEARS, S/O ABBAS, RESIDING AT NIDUVANAMVAYAL HOUSE,
KUMBADAGE VILLAGE, ETHADKA (P.O), KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT.
PIN-671551
BY ADV JAISON ANTONY
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.PP - SRI. RENJITH T.R.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.11.2021, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No.3808 of 2021
2
ORDER
Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 3 in C.C. No. 430 of 2018
on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II,
Kasaragod, where they face allegations under Sections 341, 323
read with Section 34 of the IPC.
2. The allegation is that the accused persons in furtherance
of their common intention had attacked and injured the 2 nd
respondent. They attacked him with a wooden stick and an iron
punch and caused him injuries. Now the petitioners have moved
this Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing the
proceedings on the ground that the matter is settled with the 2 nd
respondent.
3. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned
counsel for the 2nd respondent and also the learned Senior Public
Prosecutor.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for
the 2nd respondent have confirmed the settlement reached between
the parties. Annexure-V affidavit of the 2nd respondent also Crl.M.C.No.3808 of 2021
indicates that the dispute is purely personal in nature that he does
not want to prosecute the case as a settlement is arrived at and
therefore he has no objection in quashing the proceedings. The
wound certificate does not indicate that the 2 nd respondent had
suffered serious injuries in the occurrence. In the circumstances,
having noticed the settlement reached with the 2 nd respondent, there
is no purpose in continuing the proceedings.
5. Entire proceedings in C. C. No. 430 of 2018. pending
before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Kasaragod
shall stand quashed and the petitioners shall stand exonerated.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed as above.
Sd/-
K. HARIPAL JUDGE RMV/02/11/2021 Crl.M.C.No.3808 of 2021
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3808/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
Annexure I CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.132/2018 OF BADIADKA POLICE STATION
Annexure II CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET/FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, KASARAGOD
Annexure III CERTIFIED COPY OF THE MEMO OF EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER ALONG WITH THE CHARGE SHEET/FINAL REPORT
Annexure IV CERTIFIED COPY OF THE WOUND CERTIFICATE PRODUCED BY THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER ALONG WITH THE CHARGE SHEET/FINAL REPORT
Annexure V COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE DEFACTO-
COMPLAINANT/2ND RESPONDENT EVIDENCING SETTLEMENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!