Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10383 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.25934 OF 2015(N)
PETITIONER:
BEEVI.P.A
AGED 63 YEARS
W/O. LATE K.W., HAMSA, HOUSE NO. 3/203, NELLUKADAVU,
FORT KOCHI P.O., PIN -682 001.
BY ADVS.
SRI.ABDUL JALEEL.A
SRI.M.J.PAVU
SMT.M.A.SULFIA
RESPONDENTS:
1 KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE,
P.B. NO. 1016, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 011.
2 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
ZONAL OFFICE, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, FORT KOCHI.
3 BASHEER
S/O. ABOOBACKER, HOUSE NO. 3/204, ERAVELI COLONY,
FORT KOCHI - 682001.
4 STATE OF KERALA
REPRSENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT
DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 AND R2 - SRI.R.HARISHANKAR,STANDING COUNSEL
R4 - SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE,SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
26.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.25934 OF 2015(N) 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 26th day of March 2021
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus
directing the Corporation of Cochin and the Assistant Executive Engineer,
Zonal Office, Fort Kochi, to confirm Exhibit P3 order in accordance with section
406(3) of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994.
2. The subject issue relates to a complaint filed by the petitioner before
the Secretary of the Corporation. Consequent to which, Exhibit P3 provisional
order was passed under section 406(1) of Act, 1994. Apparently, no action
was initiated thereafter, which persuaded the petitioner to approach this Court
by filing this writ petition, especially due to the fact that Exhibit P4
representation submitted to do so was not considered by the Assistant
Executive Engineer, Zonal Office, Fort Kochi.
3. I have perused the pleadings and materials on record.
4. When the writ petition has come up for admission on 21.8.2015, an
interim order was passed by this Court directing the Corporation and the
Assistant Executive Engineer, Zonal Office, Fort Kochi, to consider Exhibit P4
representation and take appropriate decision in accordance with law, after
providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the party
respondents. Since the subject matter was pending consideration before this
Court for the past more than 6 years, I think it is only appropriate that a
quietus is given to the writ petition.
Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd respondent
i.e., the Assistant Executive Engineer, Zonal Office, Fort Kochi, to attain finality
to Exhibit P4 complaint submitted by the petitioner and the provisional order
passed by the Assistant Executive Engineer, Zonal Office, Fort Kochi, evident
from Exhibit P3 dated 5.6.2015, if it is not already disposed of, at the earliest
possible time and at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a
copy of this judgment. However, I make it clear that, if the proceedings have
attained finality, it shall not be re-opened in any circumstances.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY
smv JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 EXHIBIT-P1-TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF
THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 31/08/2002.
EXHIBIT P2 EXHIBIT-P2-TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED
18/06/2015.
EXHIBIT P3 EXHIBIT-P3-TRUE COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL
ORDER AND NOTICE DATED 05/06/2015 U/S
406(1) OF THE KERALA MUNICIPALITY ACT.
EXHIBIT P4 EXHIBIT-P4-TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION
DATED 22/06/2015
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!