Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12958 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 12203 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION
VENGOOR,PATTIKKAD,PERINTHALMANNA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY,
SYED SADIK ALI SHIHAB.
BY ADVS.
HARISANKAR V. MENON
MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)
2ND FLOOR,SAN-JUAN TOWERS,I.S.PRESS ROAD,ERNAKULAM,KOCHI-
682018.
2 NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,
DELHI-110001,REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF
COMMISSIONER.
OTHER PRESENT:
SC JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.06.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 12203 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 15th day of June, 2021
The petitioner, a Public Charitable Trust registered under the
Income Tax, is entitled for the benefits under Section 11 of the
Income Tax Act 1961 with respect to the Income held for charitable/
religious purposes. The benefit will be extended only on the assessee
filing a statement in Form 10. For the assessment year 2017 -2018, the
statement in Form 10 was filed by the petitioner belatedly. On account
of the delay, petitioner was issued with Ext.P1 assessment order,
without extending the benefits and demanding an amount of
Rs.1,32,13,830/- towards the tax due. Aggrieved by the assessment,
the petitioner has preferred an appeal and stay application. Pending
the appeal, the petitioner remitted an amount of Rs. 20,000,00/-
voluntarily towards the tax demanded under Ext.P1. While so, the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kochi issued Ext.P5 order
condoning the delay in filing the Form 10. According to the petitioner,
on condonation of the delay in filing Form 10, he became eligible for
the benefits under Section 11 and therefore the assessment as per WP(C) NO. 12203 OF 2021
Ext.P1 is liable to be corrected. Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P6
application for rectification under Section 154 and also requested for
refund of the amount paid voluntarily. The limited relief sought in this
writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to pass orders on
Ext.P6 without delay.
2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for the Income Tax
Department also.
Taking into account the limited relief sought, the writ petition is
disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P6 with notice
to the petitioner and to pass orders thereon as expeditiously as
possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time as the orders are
passed on Ext.P6, recovery steps based on Ext.P1 shall be kept in
abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed as above.
Sd/-
V.G ARUN JUDGE SJ WP(C) NO. 12203 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12203/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
Exhibit P1 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE,BENGALURU FOR THE YEAR 2017-
Exhibit P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4 COPY OF THE TAX PRAYER'S COUNTERFOIL GENERATED BY THE HDFC BANK.
Exhibit P4(A) COPY OF THE TAX PRAYER'S COUNTERFOIL GENERATED BY THE HDFC BANK.
Exhibit P4(B) COPY OF THE TAX PRAYER'S COUNTERFOIL GENERATED BY THE HDFC BANK .
Exhibit P4(C) COPY OF THE TAX PRAYER'S COUNTERFOIL GENERAL BY THE HDFC BANK.
Exhibit P5 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION),KOCHI.
Exhibit P6 COPY OF RECTIFICATION PETITION FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P7 COPY OF ARGUMENT NOTE FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!