Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sreethu Pillai vs The Secretary
2021 Latest Caselaw 12935 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12935 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2021

Kerala High Court
Sreethu Pillai vs The Secretary on 15 June, 2021
IN YHE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNARULAM
PRESENT
SHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE YT. 8. RAVI
TUESDAY, THE 15°" pay oF GUNE 2021 / ZSTH TYAISETA, 1948
WEIC) NO. STIST OF 2oe0

PETITIONER:

SREBTHU PILLAT

AGED 24 YEARS

W/O DATE NEERAT. S NATB, RESIDING AT

SRESNTLAYAN , RALAYAPURAM BG,
RODTARARRARA. , KOLLAM SSLSE6 .

BY AUYS .
§. SRESROMAR (ROLDAN)
SNT V¥. BRENA
RESPONDENTS :
i TRE SECRETARY

ARAMMULA SERVICE CO-OPRRATIVE BANK LYD-AYTO3,
MALRALIREAL, ERUMARRADY ROAD,
RIDANGANNOOR, BATHANAMTHIPYA-G89 514.

2 THE MANAGER ,
SRARMUGLA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE RANK LTR<-ATOS,
SRANNULA BRANCH, PATSANANTHITTA-G89 514.

3 SHEE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL)
CO-OPERATIVE SOCTEDSIRS ,
REVENUE TOWER, KOSRANCHERRY .
PATHANANMTRITTA~ 689 524.

& "RMR . SQMASEREBARAN HATE,
AGED 86 YEARS
RESIDING AT TYOURTS, RIDANGANOOR .
PATHANAMTEITTA ~889 Si4.

RY ADYS.
SRI. RR. RARTROUMAR
SRI. RRISENA. ROMBSR
SRI. CRARDRA BARU
SRI. ARGON RAGHAVAN
SRI. DINRSE TRANKAPPAN

PRIS WRIT PETITION (CSVIR) BRAVING COME UP FOR ADNISSTON ON
L&.08.2021, TRE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE POLIASTING:
 

WRC} NO. S27 7S) OF 2020

 

Dated this the 15" day of Jume 2021

Neard Shris.Sreekumar (Kollam), learned counsel for
the petitioner.

2. The writ petition relates to appointment under the
dying-in-harness scheme in the Aranmula Service Co-
operative Bank Ltd. The petitioner is the wife of deceased
Neeraj &, Nair who was working as a sales man in Aranmula
service Co-operative Bank Lid. Qwing to certain disputes
bebween the petitioner and other legal heirs of the deceased
Neeraj S Nair, the petitioner's application for employment
under the dying-In-harness scheme was kept pending by the
i* respondent Bank awaiting a settlement of the disputes
bebween the parties. During the pendency of this writ petition,
the parties were referred for mediation and the mediatar has
submitted a report to this Court on 12.04.2021 stating that
the disputes between the petitioner, the 4° respondent and
the 4" respondent's wife have been settled amicably through
the miediation. The terms af the settlement has also been
placed before this Court. The report of the mediator be made

part of this judgment.
 

WiC} NO. 27S? OF 2080

BR

3
The writ petition is disposed of in the light of the above
settiement of disputes directing the petitioner te produce a
copy of this judgment along with the report of the mediation
which has been annexed herewith before the IY respondent
Bank to faciitate the Bank to take a decision regarding the

compassionate enrployment.

Sd}
T.R.RAVI
JUDGE
 

WRC} NO. SUSY OF BO20

APPENDIN OF WE{C) 27787 (2020

ARABIAN

BETITIONER'S BXNISTTS

EARTEIY Bi TSE TRU COPY OF THE DEATH CRATIFICATS
DATED 19.98.2019 ISSUED PROM THE REGISTRAR
PROM BIRPTRS AND DEATHS ARANMROLA GRAMA
PANCRAYATR

ESEIBIT Be TREE TRUE COPY OF THE LEGAL REXRS SIE
CERTIFICATE DATED 12.08.2020 ISSUER BY TERE
TARBASIEDAR BROSRENCERERY

EXEIBIT BS TRUE QOPY OF TRE CERPIFICATE DATEO
AY .20 2018 ISSVED BY TRE VILLAGE OFFICER,
RADASASUSAN

BSEIBIT Be TRUE COPY OF TRE BPELICATRION DATED
OF. 03.2620

ESRIBIT FS TRE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED
L8.G3.20280 ISSUED BY THE Ls? RESPONDENT

BRRISITT FS TRE TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 8/2018
DATED OS .O7.S018 OF TRE GOVERNMENT OF
RERALA

BEARIBIY BP? SRE TRUS COPY OF THEE CONSENT LETTER OF THE
PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT'S EXEIBITS > NER

ffPROE Copy ys BA TO JUDGE
 

tn,

; Zon Tarmoonady

0284385
3LE

 

 

Case No ' WP(C) 27757 £2020 (T}

MR No : ae /2021
Name of petitioner/plainth? Srm. Sreethu Pillai

Name of Defendant/ Respondent : (1) Secretary,

Aranmula Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
i2) The Manager,

Aranmula Service Co-Cperatve Bank Ltd.
(3) The Assistant Registrar (General).

Co-Operative Socities, Koghencherry

 

(4) Mr. Somasekharan Nair

Name of Mediator : Adv. Philip Thengumchernl Varghese

Repart filed by the Meitiator in the above numbered case

itis hereby reported that mediation was successful in the above numbered case as the
disputes between the parties successfully settled through the mediation conducted belore
the mexhation centre.

oe
" '

~ noes --

a ar

1
oe

Pathanamthitta "Mediator
Date: 12.04.2021
 

 

DISTRICT MEDIATION CENTRE , PATHANAMTHITTA

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 OF THE
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULE 24 OF THE CIVIL
PROCEDURE (ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION )

RULES 2008,
Before the Hon'ble .. LE CIURI ¢ OF SELES 4) | exes

Pathanamthitta
. ff * : ene ~ a
Caeny. 2 WAI KK ) IFPSF/2007)
MRNo 9: 9/8? £74

*

Name of petitioner / plant? Appellant :Name of Respondent / Defendant Accesed

Street Fr dew Fhe Seewetary

Derren JK Sevvra Ce a7?

feemue Lob ed Bg Mrs,

The parties above named beg to submit as follows :

l. The aforesaid Suit / Petition / appeal /{s) complaint were referred to mediation for resolving the dispute benween the parties . In the course of mediation, they have resolved their dispute and have agreed to the following serms am conditians

TERMS AND CONDITIONS oo --, UW) &B eo 7 ep) « sa) (cop Lf Jegesa/

fo ~Y a SD LOVES OUTS Ay De PDA / ae is ord 2 OS Gm de G2 (IB EES wy ns te " , . f a et Ro caf wh ae / fo: ae ps? a el we oe rrr"

Be msg ety OS) an)" Ee les oP Raa expiry andar «

o ° . "~ +) paper Ge 5 og, ile . Gr &

ge OR} 2) ¢ cs \ra2l S) ae Bull

on ° ' ot OVLOTD Se VkrySe ree _ eres, 8 eel) OS, al OD OAD OP BS 2 es Py Boks » Poo. fie Oty |

we Dove Saye o re 4 on me sh Cee if OO 2 ay)

f 33 O20) HQ CI alfrrg M2203) SOB IB AR a Sal , Sy oe F108 Sey # 09/

Pd

Sen {3290S Bore [Bf & spf 2 PF IE>

wr rao >> ee CED VEY» 18 ow SF) ¢ > ") seen oD

ole atin) ay Oars Pve ee £2. <P) rong

Pes coy } :

BIB 9 AS 30 crv 2 ee eo pe) ewe.

{ 2. ) Cun fr cy a DD, a) Oe e FS -- we ~-- PVF mrs my (>) bs PY LF (B2 ro/ AIP Seg COND. GF BA CD Bo oo? age aes PLD val) ex ion ost) Se) 3 My me) Bose GSS Ba CMa T ts 44 a oe ; © Ss i } rey Dewken J Qo

ru SO) . 3 s

roe 8 vo ext es o) CI men ese fn ave S < SR ee

| " sO rece 1333 0D LS BID oa} i, cA 20 ) wet "eS > Se SPH lay oe 2D

PS Jeane, F-> GS 2E) Of 0 = * "ts Bios gE o ce feng ' 22 @ ley CPBII] teem -

"os

GEA " Map en tp Sey IT ls dale

WP CO? we 29957 (2020 OF

a7 PCSICE of "ws" at {ey cy os) eer wer

-- a, s3ey) Bcd Rho

ee we "pf ae "

mg KY. 'y "xf AB 2

4-3?" & as apes (Bee Wg) 0700

ad (HF > eB o~ ce ff Song ALE. Bxiehes f(O}O§ OEE. Ep krefies -, . Seer ke --! --, Raven, i wh " . a C * net fo Ps Co ert aad u eve al Le. eer fhe ee ee -- re £) C) ee .

S ' f 3 chy y oh x Co re? 4. Os Ln

| -- ° ~~ f ff > os, ) ak) (6) ee eo De ae) py t/ Q

LED em moet gore 2a bee / EF, 0 ee j.. {8308 aek) eb LO - wre Or SD») gre RBIS core) Ce) BS caspase

ow COND CP tg) 3

(>

, Den - ' oe ee Ke oGIEC Fes

> 4 Lae - ARI * 5 ow ir i) Na reore -

"we A> 2S a) enl2 corey 2 Deaifer

-- CD LOY CS AONE co COE oe wo gt (9 3) 2h pe Le , ee a ge at Sf rap i Ae -

: ig a} 1, yelp = We3 oe Sule UL fo . came cy wt merge foe

os oem (Pi ADA 7 Az Bate Da SDS? oo i OEY By Ste} ater oN les) ig es. oe FD ry Db * cor " " fe a

fa rp . & > af : " , oe "oO ot cn By OD oe As re ee 2 SICA! pork

SOS? eo AL.) Z eo TAG Se Ap me te

caf wy st mote) "S G >Does of fe Berla0ke,

*,

~ ~ fs ox s p> 3X D0 rey CRS PL fen nals

i. oo ~ : "

Oey Cy> DO oo rate Or "a " elf Peso est m2 ales otf eQ om lf V3 0B

cA ne .

ra

-- "> ZS DOES > a fy COV? TSS aa oe © PBS = ee Ee

5). Se) a oR) Lp,

on C3

i

"oo e Ger 8, 0 fig eel.

we anew 2 ew Goro fF ~ maf OER Cm

ey ~ 73 9

wat

"?

% - ¢

>, f c "} See eth fh vox Ji fo i

cer bs hog

Ns Ay

we ° . f - SS - oe é we} C} " MO A & a Po ga FEES oof ov x fet gb ee rn ayn OS 72GB AL - et .

oe 5 CN Y { xe A Re

-- ; a ' oy ac 2a

2. In view of the aforesaid agreement entered into between the parties. The parties pray that the Suit(s}, Appeals(s) may be decreed/ Dismissed / Disposed of in terms of the aforesaid agreement.

3. In view of the aforesaid agreement, the plainufits) / appellantis} / pray{s) for refiad of the full institution fees,

4, Parties will appear On occ cca ekc ne era ea ceeewereensceenes before the Hon'ble court for passing orders / decree in terms of the above said agreement.

¢ Hye goed . oma cathe Pr RAE _

Sxe & hs hin Rul ae "y

Apes & ao >| * 7a PB ; te a < Col A, SALE th bs (pits ce ° vo Plaintiffs)' Petitioners Defendant/Respondent/ Accused Appellant(s), Applicants Complainant.{ Name and signature } Advocate for Advocate for Plaintiif's}/ Petitioner Defendant/Respondent' Accused, 5 Appelant(s), Applicants Complainant.

YERIFICATION

We the parties above named, do hereby solemnly state and declare that what is contained in paragraphs 1 to ....%...... are true and correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief,

Cerca elle Suable:

P di odfs Place: bie than Thor FOR Plamits)/ Petitoner/ Appellant(s) "Applicants Date: f2 ory i 5e2 | Complainant (Name and Signature}

4, add * ce SOP LEAR RRA fo. oy .

me Of .

Cees Cae fe C mis

amt

Defendant' Respondent/ Accused (Name and signature)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter