Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15743 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2021
WP(C) NO. 15237 OF 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 15237 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
SAINULABDEEN ABDUL RAHIM,AGED 61 YEARS
S/O. AHAMED SAINULABDEEN, RESIDING AT TC NO.
50/397, IYRANIMUTTOM, MANACAUD P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695009, REPRESENTED BY HIS
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MOHAMED N., S/O.
NOOHUKANNU, RESIDING AT T.C. NO.22/388/14,
MANGOTTUKADAVU ROAD, ATTUKAL, KONCHIRAVILA,
MANACAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695009.
BY ADVS.
S.JUSTUS
M.K.MUHAMAD SHAH
RESPONDENT/S:
AUTHORISED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, BANK OF
BARODA, AMBALATHARA BRANCH, AMBALATHARA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695026.
BY ADV LEO GEORGE
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.LEO GEORGE, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 30.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 15237 OF 2021
2
A.M. BADAR, J.
----------------------------
W.P.(C) No.15237 of 2021
-----------------------------
Dated this the 30th day of July, 2021
JUDGMENT
The learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the
respondent.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. He
submits that the petitioner wants to get the loan
regularised and suitable instalments be granted for
getting the loan regularised.
3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
respondent argued that a loan of Rs.80,00,000/- was
taken by the petitioner on 16.12.2017 for a term of 72
months. The repayment was by instalments of
Rs.1,30,784/- per month. The petitioner defaulted in
payment of instalments and hence the loan was declared
as non-performing asset on 31.01.2020. It is further
argued that notice of possession has been issued by
the respondent under the SARFAESI Act and the
physical possession of the secured property, as per WP(C) NO. 15237 OF 2021
the order passed by the learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, is going to be taken on 05.08.2021.
4. The learned counsel for the respondent further
argued that if the petitioner pays an amount of
Rs.5,00,000/- out of the total overdue amount of
Rs.20,71,877/- and subsequently deposits the overdue
amount in 6 to 7 monthly instalments, then the
respondent shall consider regularisation of the loan
account of the petitioner.
5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that 10 instalments be granted to
the petitioner for clearing the over due amount.
6. In view of the facts and circumstances of the
instant case and as the respondent is willing to grant
facility of instalments to the petitioner for clearing
the over due amount, the petition is ordered as under:
7. The petitioner shall pay an amount of
Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs only) on or before
05.08.2021 to the respondent and he shall clear the
balance overdue amount with interest and other
charges, if any, in 10 equated successive monthly WP(C) NO. 15237 OF 2021
instalments commencing from 06.09.2021. In addition,
the petitioner shall also pay the EMIs regularly.
8. If the petitioner complies with this order,
then the respondents shall not continue with coercive
action under the SAFAESI Act.
A single default by the petitioner will entail the
respondents to continue with the action under the
SARFAESI Act. No further extension of time for
compliance of this order shall be granted to the
petitioner. Petitioner shall not create any third
party interest over the property.
Sd/-
A.M. BADAR JUDGE rkc WP(C) NO. 15237 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15237/2021
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUECOPY OF THE PROSSESSION NOTICE DATED 21/01/2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 22/07/2021 ISSUED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER ALONG WITH THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!