Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15350 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2021
WP(C) NO. 14584 OF 2021 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2021 / 31ST ASHADHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 14584 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
VINOO SHELLY
S/O.P.C.SHELLY, PUTHEN VEETTIL HOUSE, GOTHURUTHY
P.O., NORTH PARAVUR, PIN - 683 513.
BY ADV LAL K.JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 121.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
COLLECTORATE, KAKKANADU P.O., ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 682 030.
3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD ROADS DIVISION, NEAR NGO QUARTERS,
KAKKANADU P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 030.
4 THE TAHSILDAR
NORTH PARAVUR, PARAVUR TALUK OFFICE, NORTH
PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 513.
5 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
CHENDAMANGALAM VILLAGE OFFICE, CHENDAMANGALAM,
NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 512.
6 AJITH,
(FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) AGE
NOT KNOWN, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS
DIVISION, PWD OFFICE (ROADS DIVISION), NORTH
PARAVUR, PIN - 683 513, ADDRESS NOT KNOWN TO THE
WP(C) NO. 14584 OF 2021 2
PETITIONER (IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY).
7 SAINUDDIN
(FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) AGE
NOT KNOWN, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PWD ROADS DIVISION,
PWD OFFICE (ROADS DIVISION), NORTH PARAVUR, PIN -
683 513, ADDRESS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER (IN
HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY).
8 TALUK SURVEYOR
TALUK OFFICE, NORTH PARAVOOR, PIN - 683 513.
9 ADDL.R9. THE TAHSILDAR (LR)
PARAVUR TALUK OFFICE,
NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 513.
[ADDL.R9 IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER JUDGMENT
DATED 22/7/2021 IN WP(C)14584/2021.]
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 22.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 14584 OF 2021 3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner contends that he is the absolute owner in title and
possession of property having an extent of 4.45 Ares of land comprised in
Sy. No.122/3-2 of Chendamangalam Village, Paravur Taluk. The said
property was acquired on the strength of Ext.P1 deed. According to the
petitioner, he had approached this Court earlier challenging the notice
issued under the Land Conservancy Act, 1957 and the Rules framed
thereunder. After an elaborate consideration of the facts and circumstances,
this Court had disposed of the writ petition by Ext.P5 judgment quashing
the notice issued by the Assistant Executive Engineer and liberty was
granted to the respondents to issue a fresh notice under Section 11 of the
LC Act, 1957 and finalize the proceedings within a time frame. It is
contended that after the disposal of the writ petition, the petitioner obtained
copy of the old Survey sketch and a perusal of the same revealed that some
errors have crept into the resurvey which was conducted later. The
grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the directions issued by this
Court, the respondents will refuse to take note of Ext.P6 old survey sketch.
In the said circumstances, the petitioner is stated to have filed Ext.P7
representation before the 4th respondent. The prayer in this writ petition is
to direct the 4th respondent to consider Ext.P7 representation and to issue
necessary directions to the Taluk Surveyor who has been arrayed as the 8th
respondent herein to consider Ext.P6 sketch as well before finalizing the
proceedings as directed by this Court in Ext.P5 common judgment.
2. I have heard Sri. Lal K. Joseph, the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner and Sri. Mathew George Vadakkel, the learned
Government Pleader.
3. Sri. Lal K.Joseph, the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been called to appear before the
concerned respondent on 26.7.2021 and he would be satisfied if necessary
directions are issued to take note of Ext.P6 before finalizing the
proceedings.
4. The learned Government Pleader submitted that though Ext.P7
was submitted before the Tahsildar (LR), the said authority has not been
arrayed as a party to the proceeding.
5. The Tahsildar (LR) is suo moto impleaded as additional 9th
respondent. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary corrections to
the cause title.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the
submissions made across the Bar, this writ petition is disposed of directing
the additional 9th respondent to consider Ext.P7 representation and issue
necessary directions to the 8th respondent to take note of Ext.P6 old survey
sketch as well if the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 has not been finalized
till date.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE NS
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.841/1/2013 OF S.R.O PARAVUR DATED 12.04.2013
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO.429/2020 DATED 25.02.2020 IN RESPECT OF 4.45 ARES OF PROPERTY ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 10.4.2019
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 20/2/2020
EXHIBIT P4(a) TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 3/3/2020 TO EXT.P4
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) 6941/20, W.P.(C) 12202/20, W.P.(C) 12175/20, W.P.(C) 12149/20 & W.P.(C) 15590 OF 2020 DATED 26-11-2020
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE OLD SURVEY SKETCH OBTAINED FROM THE 4TH RESPONDENT BY AN RTI APPLICATION
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16/7/21 FILED BEFORE 4TH RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P7(a) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 16/7/21 OF EXT.P7 REPRESENTATION FROM 4TH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!