Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14981 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 25TH ASHADHA, 1943
AR NO. 101 OF 2020
APPLICANT:
PRASHANTH VAIDYANATHAN, AGED 40 YEARS
S/O.VAIDYANATHAN RAMANATHAN, RESIDING AT HOUSE
NO.34/1934, BTS ROAD, BYE LANE 10, EDAPPALY, ERNAKULAM-
682 024, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
VAIDYANATHAN RAMANATHAN, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.RAMANTHAN,
RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.34/1934, BTS ROAD, BYE LANE 10,
EDAPPALY, ERNAKULAM-682 024.
BY ADV SHRI.SREEHARI INDUKALADHARAN
OPPOSITE PARTY:
K.NEELAKANDAN NAMBEESHAN, AGED 43 YEARS
S/O.KESAVA SHARMA, RESIDING AT KAZHAKAPURAM VEEDU,
COCHIN CORPORATION, DOOR NO.637/2786, MANIMALA ROAD,
CHUTTUPADUKARA, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI-682 024.
THIS ARBITRATION REQUEST HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AR 101/20
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court,
through this Arbitration Request impelled under
Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation
Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'
for short), alleging that certain disputes have
arisen between him and the respondent with respect
to the covenants and agreements in Annexure A1
agreement dated 21.10.2018, which was entered into
validly.
2. The petitioner says that when the disputes
could not be resolved through other acceptable
methods, he issued Annexure A5 notice to the
respondent as early as on 01.08.2020, seeking that
a sole Arbitrator be appointed, suggesting the
name of a particular person for such purpose. He
submits that in spite of Annexure A5 having been
received by the respondent, he has chosen neither
to reply nor to accede to or to even nominate an AR 101/20
Arbitrator of his choice. The petitioner,
therefore, prays that this Court appoint a
suitable Arbitrator to adjudicate and resolve the
disputes, as are mentioned in Annexure A5.
3. I have heard Sri.Sreehari Indukaladharan -
learned counsel for the petitioner; but there is
no appearance on behalf of the respondent.
4. The endorsement on the files of this case
shows that respondent has been validly served but
he has chosen not to be present in person or to be
represented through counsel; inferentially guiding
me to the impression that he does not object to
the request of the petitioner, as projected in
this Arbitration Request.
5. As per the pleadings on record, Annexure
A1 is a partnership deed between the parties and
the petitioner asserts that this has been entered
into validly and with full volition. The mechanism
for resolution of the disputes contained in
Annexure A1, is available in Clause 24 thereof, AR 101/20
which reads as under:
All disputes and differences whatsoever which shall arise between the partners or between the partners and the personal representatives of the deceased partner relating to any matter whatsoever touching the affairs of the partnership or the interpretation of this agreement and whether before or after the determination of the partnership shall be referred to a single arbitrator, if the parties agree upon one, otherwise to three arbitrators one to be appointed by each party to the difference in accordance with and subject to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or any statutory modification or re-enactment thereof for the time being in force.
6. Ineluctably, therefore, this Court is now
enjoined under the mandate of Section 11(6A) of
the Act to nominate and appoint a suitable
Arbitrator.
In summation:
(a) I nominate Sri.P.R.Shaji, CC-42/1569-D,
Apartment#1, First Floor, Kallath Apartments,
Mathai Manjooran Road, Kochi - 18, as the sole
Arbitrator to adjudicate and resolve the disputes
and differences between the parties to this case
arising from Annexure A1 agreement.
(b) The Registry is directed to communicate AR 101/20
a copy of this order to the learned Arbitrator,
within a period of two weeks from today and to
obtain a Statement of Disclosure from him under
Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
(c) Once the Disclosure Statement is
obtained from the learned Arbitrator, the Registry
shall release the certified copy of this order,
with a copy of the said statement appended to it,
retaining the original of the same on the files of
this case.
(d) The fees of the Arbitrator shall be
governed by the Fourth schedule to the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996.
(e) In order to enable the Arbitrator to
commence the proceedings without delay, I direct
the parties to mark appearance before him at 11 am
on 01.09.2021. Since the respondents are remaining
ex parte in this proceedings, the learned
Arbitrator shall notify them of this date, or a AR 101/20
future date, appropriately.
Sd/-
RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
AR 101/20
APPENDIX OF AR 101/2020
PETITIONER ANNEXURE:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT
DATED 21.10.2018 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE APPLICANTS AND OPPOSITE PARTY.
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPTS DATED 14.11.2018 EVIDENCING ACCEPTANCE OF THE AMOUNT BY THE OPPOSITE PARTY FROM THE APPLICANTS.
ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE RETIREMENT LETTER FROM THE PARTNERSHIP FIRM DATED 21.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE APPLICANTS TO THE OPPOSITE PARTY.
ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER DATED 15.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE OPPOSITE PARTY TO THE APPLICANTS.
ANNEXURE A5 TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 01.08.2020 ISSUED TO THE OPPOSITE PARTY.
ANNEXURE A6 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING ISSUANCE OF HE LAWYER NOTICE.
ANNEXURE A7 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD AS PROOF OF DELIVERY OF THE POSTAL ARTICLE.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!