Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14849 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2021
W.P(C).7657/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 24TH ASHADHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 7657 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
ANILKUMAR. S, AGED 51 YEARS
DRIVER GRADE - I, THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
CORPORATION, KOLLAM DEPOT, KOLLAM DISTRICT, RESIDING AT
ANUPAM, T.K.M.C KOLLAM.
BY ADV O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
TRANSPORT BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2 THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT
BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001.
3 THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KOLLAM.691001
4 THE QUILON DISTRICT STATE TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES CO-
OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD Q.76, KOLLAM. 691001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN
OTHER PRESENT:
SC,SRI.T.P SAJAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P(C).7657/2021
2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is employed as a driver of Kerala State Road Transport
Corporation. He had availed a loan from the 4th respondent/Co-operative
bank. Petitioner had permitted recovery from his salary, to pay the loan
due to the society in monthly installments. According to the petitioner,
though the amounts were deducted regularly from his salary, those
amounts were not remitted with 4 th respondent/society and were diverted
by the KSRTC for its own purposes.
2. Learned counsel for the KSRTC replied to a specific question
put by this Court as to whether the entire amount due from the petitioner
as per the original condition has been recovered, it was submitted in the
affirmative. It is also true that, wherever the amounts have been deducted
by the KSRTC, the money was kept by them as a trustee for being remitted
with the 4th respondent. In the light of above if there is belated remittance
by the KSRTC, they are bound to pay the interest on each deducted
amount or each installment deducted from the salary, commencing from
that date of deduction. This amount is liable to be paid to the fourth
respondent. Learned counsel for the KSRTC submitted that, due to
financial stringency, KSRTC finds it difficult to pay the entire amount in
lump and sought remittance in six monthly installments. W.P(C).7657/2021
3. Having considered this, I am inclined to dispose of the Writ
Petition with the following directions:
(i) First respondent/KSRTC shall stop forthwith
deduction from the salary of the petitioner towards the loan
amount due to the 4th respondent.
(ii) The entire amount deducted with interest from
each date of deduction till the date of payment shall be
remitted by the KSRTC in six equal monthly installments with
4th respondent, commencing from 09.08.2021 in accordance
with the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Writ
Appeal No.2060 of 2006. Issue regarding any other interest,
including penal interest, shall be settled between the KSRTC
and the 4th respondent. Interest portion that the KSRTC is
bound to pay shall not be recovered from the petitioner.
Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
SUNIL THOMAS JUDGE Sbna/ W.P(C).7657/2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7657/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 21.09.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION DATED 22.09.2020 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECOVERY STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!