Hajayakumar M.K vs The Deputy General Manager
2021 Latest Caselaw 14542 Ker

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
  TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943
                     WP(C) NO. 10356 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:

    1       HAJAYAKUMAR M.K.,AGED 43 YEARS
            S/O KRISHNAN RESIDING AT MATHENPARAMBIL HOUSE,
            VEROOR P.O, ENACHIRA, CHANGANACHERRY, PROPRIETOR,
            M/S SHALIMAR MARBLES AND GRANITES, A.C.ROAD,
            MANACKACHERRY, PIN-686101.

    2       LAKSHMY B,W/O HAJAYAKUMAR,RESIDING AT
            MATHENPARAMBIL HOUSE, VEROOR P.O, ENACHIRA
            PROPRIETOR, M/S SHALIMAR VITRIFIED AND SANITARIES,
            A.C. ROAD, MANACKACHIRA, CHANGANACHERRY, PIN-101.

            BY ADVS.P.HARIDAS
            SRI.BIJU HARIHARAN
            SRI.P.C.SHIJIN
            SRI.RISHIKESH HARIDAS



RESPONDENT/S:

    1       THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER.,STATE BANK OF INDIA,
            KOTTAYAM, PIN-686574.

    2       REGIONAL MANAGER,
            STATE BANK OF INDIA, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686574.

    3       STATE BANK OF INDIA,SARB, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED
            BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER,
            STRESSED ASSETS RECOVERY BRANCH, 7TH FLOOR,
            VANKARATH TOWERS, PALARIVATTOM BYPASS JUNCTION,
            KOCHI, PIN-682024.

            BY ADV SRI.M.JITHESH MENON


     THIS     WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)     HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION    ON   13.07.2021,     THE     COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 10356 OF 2021




                                      -2-




                            A.M.BADAR, J.

  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -
                     WP(C) NO. 10356 OF 2021
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
              Dated this the 13th day of July, 2021

                               JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the petitioners want to withdraw the petition and accordingly, a memo has been filed.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

sd A.M.BADAR, JUDGE.

dl/