Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13967 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 18664 OF 2020
PETITIONER:
BIJO ALEXANDER
AGED 51 YEARS
S/O.K.M.ALEXANDER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF
POLICE, DISTRICT SPECIAL BRANCH, WAYANAD, PIN -
670 646 RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.19/351/D OF
TRIPUNITHURA MUNICIPALITY, VALLIALIL KALLUKATTIL
HOUSE, NADAMA VILLAGE, TRIPUNITHURA P.O.,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682 301.
BY ADVS.
C.S.MANU
SRI.S.K.PREMRAJ
SRI.T.B.SIVAPRASAD
SRI.C.A.ANUPAMAN
SRI.C.Y.VIJAY KUMAR
SMT.MANJU E.R.
SHRI.ANANDHU SATHEESH
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AND
VIGILANCE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
2 STATE POLICE CHIEF/DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN -
695 001.
3 DIRECTOR OF VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU
DIRECTORATE, PMG, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 033.
4 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
VIGILANCE AND ANTI -CORRUPTION BUREAU, SPECIAL
CELL 38/2871, CBI ROAD, NEAR CBI OFFICE,
KATHRIKADAVU, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 017.
BY ADV.SRI.A.RAJESH,SPL.PP,VACB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 18664 OF 2020
2
R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, J
-------------------------------------------
W.P (C). No. 18664 of 2020
-------------------------------------------
Dated this the 06th day of July, 2021
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the accused in the case registered as
VC14/2016/SCE by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau
(VACB), Special Cell, Ernakulam for the offence punishable under
Section 13(1)(e) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988.
2. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner to issue a
direction to the investigating officer to consider certain documents
and also the representation made by him during the investigation
of the case.
3. When the matter came up for hearing yesterday,
learned Public Prosecutor submitted that final report has already
been filed in the case by the VACB in the competent court and the
court has also taken cognizance of the offence and the case is now
pending before the jurisdictional court as C.C.No.21/2020. WP(C) NO. 18664 OF 2020
4. The case was adjourned and posted today to enable the
learned counsel for the petitioner to get instructions in the matter.
5. When the case is taken up today for hearing, learned
counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be
permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the
final report filed against him in the appropriate proceedings.
6. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the
final report filed against him in the appropriate proceedings, if he is
advised to do so.
Sd/-R. NARAYANA PISHARADI JUDGE lsn
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!