Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Mahamood Haji vs Priyanka G
2021 Latest Caselaw 13598 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13598 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021

Kerala High Court
K.Mahamood Haji vs Priyanka G on 1 July, 2021
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
         THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2021 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1943
                       CON.CASE(C) NO. 464 OF 2021
 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.16578/2020 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA


PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:


     1     K.MAHAMOOD HAJI,
           AGED 64 YEARS, S/O. KUNJUTHARUVAI HAJI, KEDANJOTH HOUSE,
           KUNNUMMAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,PIN-670004.

     2     FAREEDA,
           AGED 38 YEARS, D/O. K.MAHAMOOD HAJI, KEDANJOTH HOUSE,
           KUNNUMMAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-670004.

     3     NASEETHA,
           AGED 35 YEARS, D/O. K.MAHAMOOD HAJI, KEDANJOTH HOUSE,
           KUNNUMMAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-670004.

     4     MOOSA,
           AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. K.MAHAMOOD HAJI, KEDANJOTH HOUSE,
           KUNNUMMAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-670004.

     5     RASHITHA,
           AGED 29 YEARS, D/O. K.MAHAMOOD HAJI, KEDANJOTH HOUSE,
           KUNNUMMAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-670004.

     6     THAHIR,
           AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. K.MAHAMOOD HAJI, KEDANJOTH HOUSE,
           KUNNUMMAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-670004.

     7     SHAHEEDA,
           AGED 24 YEARS, D/O. K.MAHAMOOD HAJI, KEDANJOTH HOUSE,
           KUNNUMMAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-670004.

     8     SAJITHA,
           AGED 20 YEARS, D/O. K.MAHAMOOD HAJI, KEDANJOTH HOUSE,
           KUNNUMMAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-670004.
      9     SHAHID,
           AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. MOIDU, VELLAMVEEDINTAVIDA,
           THEKKEMANAKKAT, CHOMBALA P.O., KUNNUMMAKARA, KOZHIKODE
           DISTRICT, PIN-673308

    10     ABDULLA,
           AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMED, ILLATHTHAZHEKUNI, ONCHIYAM
           P.O., KOZHIKODE-673507.

    11     SAKKEER,
           AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. MOIDU HAJI, KOCHERI, ORKKATTERI P.O.,
           ERAMALA, KOZHIKODE-673501.

           BY ADV SRI. G.SANTHOSH KUMAR (P).


RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT NO.3 & VILLAGE OFFICER:


     1     PRIYANKA G.,
           REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, CIVIL
           STATION, JUMA MASJID, SH29, ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE-673020.

     2     BEENA K.,
           VILLAGE OFFICER, KASABA VILLAGE, PUTHIYARA P.O.,
           KOZHIKODE-673004

           SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, SR.GOVT.PLEADER




     THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                      ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
          ------------------------------------------------------
                   Cont. Case (C) No. 464 of 2021
                                    in
                      WP(C) No. 16578 of 2020
          ------------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 1st day of July, 2021

                          JUDGMENT

The above Contempt of Court case has been filed

alleging non compliance of the directions and orders passed by

this Court as per Anx.A1 judgment dated 25.8.2020 in

WP(C).No.16578/2020.

2. Heard Sri.G.Santhosh Kumar, learned counsel

appearing for the petitioners and Sri.Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned

Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. Today when the matter has been taken up for

consideration, Sri.Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned Senior

Government Pleader would submit on the basis of instructions

that the application filed by the petitioners in Form No.9 in

respect of his claim under Sec.27A(6) of State Act 28 of 2008 had

come up for consideration before the 1st respondent RDO on

10.6.2021 for hearing, thereupon the petitioners herein had

sought for time and accordingly the matter was adjourned to

14.6.2021 and that in earlier the Village Officer concerned had Cont. Case (C) No. 464 of 2021

..4..

submitted his inspection report on 23.9.2020 and that in case the

petitioners fully co-operate with the matter, then final orders in the

abovesaid Form No.9 application (marked as Ext.P-5 in the WP(C)) can

be passed in compliance with the directions in the judgment in the

above WP(C) within 3 weeks or so.

4. Accordingly, it is ordered that the respondent officer is

given time up to one month from the date of receipt of a certified

copy of this judgment for ensuring compliance of the directions

issued by this Court in Anx.A1 judgment.

With these observations and directions, the above

Contempt of Court case will stand disposed of.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE

MMG Cont. Case (C) No. 464 of 2021

..5..

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 464/2021

PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.8.2020 IN WP(C) NO.16578/2020 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter