Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13565 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
ST
THURSDAY, THE 1 DAY OF JULY 2021 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 11159 OF 2015
PETITIONER/S:
A.SUBHINA
W/O. K.G. GIREESHKUMAR, SALES ASSISTANT, NEETHI STORE,
THIRUVANCHOOR SERVICE CO-OP. BANK, THIRUVANCHOOR-686019,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.V.RAJENDRAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
KOTTAYAM, P.O. CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM-686002.
2 THIRUVANCHOOR SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. NO. 1942
P.O. THIRUVANCHOOR-686019, REPRESSENTED BY THE SECRETARY.
BY ADV SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
OTHER PRESENT:
GP SRI B HARISH KUMAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 11159 OF 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the
following reliefs:
a. call for the records leading to Ext.P3 and quash the same by the issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction.
b. declare that the petitioner is entitled to remain in service in the Neethi Store run by the 2 nd respondent and direct the 2nd respondent by the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction to retain her in service of the Neethi Store;
1.c. direct the 1st respondent by the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus or other writ, order or direction to consider Ext.P4 representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
2. This Court while admitting the writ petition had passed
the interim direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P4
representation with notice to the petitioner and the second
respondent within a period of two weeks. No information has
been supplied to this Court. There was no interim order with
regard to the challenge of termination order. Even otherwise,
there is an alternative remedy to challenge the same under
Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules.
This Court cannot examine the veracity of the termination
order by exercising the power of judicial review under Article WP(C) NO. 11159 OF 2015
226 of the constitution of India. The petitioner is relegated to
avail the remedy, if so advised. In case the petitioner avails the
remedy within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this judgment, the objection qua the limitation
would not be taken.
SD/-
sab AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 11159 OF 2015
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11159/2015
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE
ORDER NO. CS (2) 39539/07
DATED 4-2-11 OF THE
REGISTRAR OF CO-OP
SOCIETIES.
EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE
ORDER DATED 26-2-2014 OF
THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF THE
ORDER DATED 26-3-2015 OF
THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P4. TRUE COPY OF THE
REPRESENTATION DATED 31-
3-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE
PETITIONER TO THE 1ST
RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!