Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Jayakrishnan vs N.Jayakrishnan
2021 Latest Caselaw 670 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 670 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
N.Jayakrishnan vs N.Jayakrishnan on 8 January, 2021
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

                                  &

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

     FRIDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 18TH POUSHA, 1942

                        WA.No.1282 OF 2020
       AGAINST THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 24.09.2020 IN WP(C)
            NO.15905/2020(K) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA


APPELLANT/8TH RESPONDENT:

              N.JAYAKRISHNAN
              AGED 41 YEARS
              S/O.S.NARAYANAN POTTI, NARAYANEEYAM, SAARKARA,
              CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 310.

              BY ADV. SMT.MINI.V.A.

RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 7:

         1    G.H.BIJU
              AGED 38 YEARS
              S/O.HARIHARA SHARMA, VADAKKE MADOM HOUSE,
              KAPPIL P.O., EDAVA VILLAGE, VARKALA TALUK,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 311.

         2    THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
              NANTHANCODE, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
              DISTRICT-695 003, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

         3    THE SECRETARY
              THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE,
              KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 003.

         4    THE COMMISSIONER
              THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE,
              KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 003.

         5    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
              ULLOOR GROUP, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 001.

         6    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
              VARKALA GROUP, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 141.
 W.A No.1282 of 2020
                                         2



           7   THE SUB GROUP OFFICER
               SUB GROUP OF KAPPIL, VARKALA GROUP, TRAVANCORE
               DEVASWOM BOARD, KAPPIL P.O., EDAVA, VARKALA,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 311.

           8   G.BIJU NAMPOOTHIRI
               S/O.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAMPOOTHIRI, NEELAMENA ILLAM @
               POURNAMI NIVAS, BHOOTHAKULAM P.O.,
               KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 302.

               R1     BY   ADV.   SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN
               R1     BY   ADV.   SRI.M.KIRANLAL
               R1     BY   ADV.   SRI.T.S.SARATH
               R1     BY   ADV.   SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA)
               R1     BY   ADV.   SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR


               SRI.C.K.PAVITHRAN,SC

     THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.A No.1282 of 2020
                                       3




          ALEXANDER THOMAS & GOPINATH P., JJ.
               ==================================
                           W.A No.1282 of 2020
               (arising out of the interim order dated 24.09.2020
                          in W.P(C) No.15905 of 2020)
               ==================================
                       Dated this the 08th day of January, 2021

                                  JUDGMENT

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

The aforecaptioned Writ Appeal has been filed as an intra-court

appeal under Sec.5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act for impugning the

interim order dated 24.09.2020 rendered by a learned Single Judge of

this Court in W.P(C)No.15905/2020 filed by the appellant (R8 in the

W.P(C)).

2. Heard Smt.V.A.Mini, learned counsel appearing for the

writ appellant/R8 in the W.P(C), Sri.C.K.Pavithran, learned Standing

Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board appearing for official

respondent Nos.2 to 7 in the writ appeal and Sri.Manu Ramachandran,

learned counsel appearing for R1 herein (writ petitioner). It appears

that R8 herein (R7 in the W.P(C)), is sailing together with the writ

appellant (R7 in the W.P(C)). In the nature of the orders proposed to

be passed by this Court in this appeal, notice to R8 will stand W.A No.1282 of 2020

dispensed with.

3. The impugned order in this intra-court appeal is an interim

order rendered by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 24.09.2020,

whereby, an already current interim order was directed to be extended

until the next posting date (27.10.2020). It appears that the original

interim order was granted on 11.08.2020. Further, we are apprised

that the impugned interim order dated 24.09.2020 has been extended

until further orders. The said interim order dated 24.09.2020 has also

been extended from time to time by the learned Single Judge. The

writ appeal has been filed in the instant case challenging only the

order granted on 24.09.2020 by the learned Single Judge, whereby the

original interim order dated 11.08.2020 was granted by the learned

Single Judge in the W.P(C). In the above writ appeal, the appellant

has not challenged the original interim order dated 11.08.2020 by the

learned Single Judge. Only after filing of the present writ appeal, the

appellant has chosen to file an application seeking for amendment of

the pleas in the memorandum of writ appeal to incorporate the

challenge as against the original interim order dated 11.08.2020. The

matter essentially arises out of the transfer and postings of employees

(Shanthikkaran viz., temple priest) in various administrative groups W.A No.1282 of 2020

under the respondent-Travancore Devaswom Board.

4. We have heard the parties in length and we are of the

considered view that since the matter is essentially relating to transfer

of employees in the Devaswom Board, the entire controversy could be

given a quietus, if the main matter in the W.P(C) is finally disposed of,

provided all the parties concerned willfully co-operate in that regard.

After hearing the parties concerned, we are not persuaded to take the

view that the exercise of discretion by the learned Single Judge in

granting the impugned interim order or the original interim order, is

in any manner unreasonable or improper. It has to be borne in mind

that the impugned order has been rendered by the learned Single

Judge only at the interlocutory stage, taking into consideration the

prima facie nature of the case involved and the balance of

convenience. Therefore, it is for the appellant and all the other parties

concerned to ensure that they all co-operate for the final disposal of

the main matter in the W.P(C), without any further delay.

5. The Registry is directed to list W.P(C) No.15905/2020, for

final disposal in the petition list on 08/02/2021. All the parties have

apprised that the pleadings in the W.P(C) have been completed; so

that the learned Single Judge is enabled to consider the final disposal W.A No.1282 of 2020

of the W.P(C), without any further delay. We make it clear that none

of the observations and findings made by this Court, can be construed

even in any manner as an expression on the merits of the controversy,

which would fall exclusively within the province of the learned Single

Judge, for the final determination of the main matter in the W.P(C).

With these observations and directions, the above Writ Appeal

will stand disposed of.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE

Sd/-

GOPINATH P., JUDGE

vgd

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter