Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 582 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 17TH POUSHA, 1942
WP(C).No.20392 OF 2020(Y)
PETITIONER:
SREEKUMAR.V.
AGED 58 YEARS
S/O.VELAPPAN CHETTIYAR, RAKKONATHU PUTHEN VEEDU,
PEYAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA
RESPONDENT:
REPCO BANK LTD.
U.K.EDIFICE COMPLEX, GROUND FLOOR, CHENTHITTA, CHALAI
P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED OFFICER.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.20392 OF 2020 2
JUDGMENT
Even though the petitioner has made
various averments and allegations in this
writ petition, when this matter was called
today, Shri.Sabu S.Kallaramoola, his learned
counsel, requested that this Court grant him
two months time to pay off the entire loan
liability.
2. The learned counsel submitted that
the petitioner is now arranging to pay off
the entire outstanding in the loan account
and therefore, that if the afore time is
granted, he will be in a position to close
the loan account and settle the liability
fully.
3. In response, Shri.V.Krishna Menon,
learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
respondent - Bank, submitted that the total
outstanding in the loan account of the
petitioner is Rs.25,78,977/-, as on
31/10/2020; and that at the best,the Bank can
allow him to pay off the same in not more
than 8 equal monthly instalments. He,
however, submitted that no moratorium of two
months as prayed for by him be granted, since
this will only have the effect of delaying
the proceedings further.
4. When I consider the afore submissions,
it is without doubt that the jurisdiction of
this Court in dealing with matters relating
to the steps taken by the Banks and Financial
Institutions under the Securitisation and
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Securities Interest Act ('the
SARFAESI Act' for brevity) is extremely
restricted on account of the judgments of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union Bank of India v.
Satyawati Tondon [2010 (8) SCC 110] and in
Authorised Officer, State Bank of Travancore and
Another v. Mathew K.C. [2018 (1) KLT 784].
5. However, since the Bank now agrees that
the outstanding in the loan account can be
paid off by the petitioner in 8 equal monthly
instalments, I am of the view that he can be
given the said latitude, so that he can
either pay the same in such manner or close
the account in two months, as he may desire.
In the afore circumstances, I order this
writ petition and direct the petitioner to pay
an amount of Rs.25,78,977/-, which is stated to
be the outstanding in the loan account as on
31/10/2020, along with all applicable charges
and interest, in 8 equal monthly instalments
commencing from 05/02/2021.
It is needless to say that if the
petitioner pays off the amounts as ordered
above or settles the liability earlier, the
Bank will close the loan account and return
the title documents of the secured assets to
the petitioner/mortgagor, as the case may be,
without any avoidable delay thereafter.
It also goes without saying that if the
petitioner commits any default of the afore
directions, the Bank will be at liberty to
continue with the proceedings under the
SARFAESI Act from the stage at which it is
available today, without having to secure any
further orders from this Court.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
MC/7.1.2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF REQUEST DATED 20.04.2020 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT SEEKING MORATARIUM BENEFIT.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 05.09.2020 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK.
MC
(TRUE COPY) PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!