Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3879 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 14TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)
PETITIONER/S:
M.SATHYADAS, AGED 51 YEARS
S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR, MANAGING PARTNER, S.A.HOMES,
MADHAVA BUILDING, KOPPAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
RESPONDENT/S:
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), PALAKKAD,
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR) PALAKKAD,
COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678001.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT VIDHYA A.C-GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)
-2-
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226
of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus
commanding the respondent Deputy Collector (LR) to consider
and pass orders in S.M.No.187/2019 on the file of the Land
Tribunal, Palakkad, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court.
The suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal,
Palakkad under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and
Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title
and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under
Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance
of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read
with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.1912 Hectares of
land comprised in Re.Sy.No.959 in Block No.24 of Palakkad-II
Village in Palakkad District.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also
the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)
3. In Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special
Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another [Judgment dated
14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases]
this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious
disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for
obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised
the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the
Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious
disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a
routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing
the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would
result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending
before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to
dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration
of such cases.
4. In Narayanan Namboodiri, this Court noticed that
by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of
Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the
jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)
the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of
the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by
the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action
necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said
Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the
reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court,
the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the
cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land
Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in
some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice
on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such
cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to
such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances,
this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions.
Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus;
"2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal:
(i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)
reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained.
(ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months.
(iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority.
(iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications.
(v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above.
(vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)
steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed.
(vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment." (underline supplied)
5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village
Officer, Pallakkad-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, initiated
suo motu proceedings as S.M.No.187/2019, as evidenced by
Ext.P1 receipt dated 28.03.2019, for assignment of the right,
title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under
Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance
of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read
with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred
to hereinbefore.
6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that
the total pendency of suo motu proceedings in the Land Tribunal,
Palakkad is 3342.
W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)
7. Having considered the submissions made by the
learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land
Tribunal, Palakkad can be directed to dispose of
S.M.No.187/2019 following the directions issued by this Court in
Narayanan Namboodiri, referred to supra.
8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by
directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of
S.M.No.187/2019, strictly in accordance with law, following the
directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in
Narayanan Namboodiri, referred to supra.
No order as to costs.
Sd/-
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.
bkn/-
W.P(C).No.2790 OF 2021(W)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 28.03.2019 SHOWING THE SUO MOTO NO.187/2019 ISSUED FROM THE RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!