Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3723 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 13TH MAGHA,1942
Crl.MC.No.7926 OF 2018(A)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 65/2018 OF SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,
PERINTHALMANNA
PETITIONERS/B PARTY IN M.C:
1 ABDUL KAREEM M.T., S/o ALAVI HAJI,
MANNARTHODIKA HOUSE, PALAKKODE,
CHATHANGOTTUPURAM, WANDOOR, PIN 670328
2 MUHAMMED MADASSERY, S/O. ENI, PALAKKODE,
CHATHANGOTTUPURAM, WANDOOR, PIN 670328
3 ASSAINAR KURIKKAL, S/o ABDULLA KURIKKAL,
IRUNNAPETTI, PALAKKODE, PUNNAPPALA,
WANDOOR, PIN 679328
4 SAINUDEEN FAISY, S/o AHAMMEDKUTTY MUSLIYAR,
PALAKKODE, CHATHANGOTTUPURAM, WANDOOR, PIN 679328
BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ
RESPONDENTS/A PARTY IN M.C.:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682031
2 T.P. ABDUL SALAM, S/o ALAVIKUTTY, SECRETARY,
PALAKKODE ISSATHUL ISLAM SANGHOM, P.O. PUNNAPPALA,
WANDOOR, PIN - 679 328.
3 T.P. MAMMED HAJI KURIKKAL, S/o UNNI HASSAN,
PRESIDENT, PALAKKODE ISSATHUL ISLAM SANGHOM,
P.O. PUNNAPPALA, WANDOOR, PIN - 679 328.
4 MOHAMMED KURIKKAL ALIAS MANU,
S/o ABDULLAKUTTY KURIKKAL, PALAKKODE,
CHANTHANGOTTUPURAM P.O., WANDOOR, PIN - 679 326.
5 V. ABDUL KAREEM, S/o AHAMMEDKUTTY,
VADAKKETHODIKA HOUSE, PALAKKODE,
CHATHANGOTTUPURAM P.O., WANDOOR - 679 326.
R2-5 BY ADV. SRI.K.RAKESH
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAMESH CHAND
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
02.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No.7926 of 2018 2
ORDER
The order under Section 146 Cr.P.C. is under
challenge on the ground that the civil suit instituted
was ended in dismissal and that the order appointing a
receiver to take up possession of property in dispute
in view of the decree passed cannot be sustained.
2. The jurisdiction vested with the Executive
Magistrate to appoint a Receiver under Section 146
Cr.P.C. is subject to a decree that may be passed by a
competent court determining the rights of parties
thereto with regard to the person entitled to
possession thereof. In the matter of appointment of
Receiver, it must be subject to the restriction imposed
under sub-section (2) of Section 146 Cr.P.C. and
Receiver can be appointed only when no Receiver was
appointed by the civil court to take possession thereof
or look after the property. A civil suit for injunction
simplicitor was ended in dismissal by which no Receiver
or any other competent person was appointed either to
take possession or administration of the disputed
property. No suit was filed regarding the title of the
property or right to administer the property and right
to take possession thereof. It was submitted by the
petitioners that they are intending to file a suit for
declaration and possession. Subject to the jurisdiction
that may be exercised by the civil court either in the
matter of taking possession/delivery of property or
appointing a Receiver to take over the administration
or possession of the property, the Executive Magistrate
can very well exercise its jurisdiction both under
Section 145 and 146 Cr.P.C. As such, the present
Crl.M.C. can only be dismissed. I do so.
Crl.M.C. is dismissed.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
DMR/- JUDGE
APPENDIX OF Crl.MC 7926/2018
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE-I TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN A.S.NO.45 OF
2016 DATED 26.07.2018 OF SUB COURT, MANJERI.
ANNEXURE-II TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.
151/2018 OF THE WANDOOR POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE-III CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.09.2018 IN M.C. NO. 65/2018 OF THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PERINTHALMANNA.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURE: NIL
// TRUE COPY //
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!