Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Geetha P.Varma vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 3719 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3719 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Geetha P.Varma vs State Of Kerala on 2 February, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

     TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 13TH MAGHA,1942

                       WP(C).No.5063 OF 2015(G)


PETITIONER:

               GEETHA P.VARMA
               AGED 52 YEARS
               W/O LATE A.K. PRAKASH VARMA,
               RESIDING AT ASWATHY, VALAYAMCHIRA,
               ERNAKULAM DISTRICT

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.N.RADHAKRISHNAN
               SMT.GIRIJA L.

RESPONDENTS:

      1        STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER
               EDUCATION DEPATMENT,
               GOVT. SECRETARIAT,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 039

      2        THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION
               VIKAS BHAVAN,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 033

      3        THE PRINCIPAL
               SREE SANKARA VIDYAPEETAM COLLEGE,
               VALAYAMCHIRA ,
               ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 556

      4        TEH ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E) KERALA,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 039

      5        THE SUB TREASURY OFFICER
               PERUMBAVOOR/KUNNATHUNADU 683 542

               R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
               R1, R3 BY ADV. SRI.A.K.GOPALAN



               GP SRI B HARISH KUMAR

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD          ON
02.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.5063 OF 2015(G)

                               2




                           JUDGMENT

Dated this the 2nd day of February 2021

Learned Government Pleader, Sri. B.Harish Kumar

submits that all the instalments have been disbursed to the

petitioner and no cause of action survives. Probably for that

reason, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

In view of the statement, this writ petition is rendered

infructuous.

Sd/-

AMIT RAWAL

JUDGE nak WP(C).No.5063 OF 2015(G)

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE PENSION PAYMENT ORDER

EXHIBIT P2 EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE GOVT. ORDER G.O.(P) NO.49/2013/H.EDN.DATED 22.2.2013

EXHIBIT P3 EXHIBIT P3:TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION ADDRESSED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 12.12.2014

EXHIBIT P4 EXHIBITP4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29.1.2015 ADDRESSED TO THE2ND RESPONDENT DATED 29.1.2015

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter