Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17686 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 5TH BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 16473 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
SUNNY PASHANATH,
AGED 49 YEARS
S/O. MOHANAN P., PASHANATH VEEDU, V.K.K. MENON ROAD,
KALLAYI P.O. KOZHIKODE 673 003.
BY ADV P.E.SAJAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE TOWN PLANNER,
KOZHIKODE REGIONAL TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE, REGIONAL TOWN
AND COUNTRY PLANNING OFFICE, KOZHIKODE 673 005.
2 REGIONAL TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE
KOZHIKODE, REGIONAL TOWN ND COUNTRY PLANNING OFFICE,
KOZHIKODE 673 005.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. P.S. APPU-G.P.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
27.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 16473 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:-
"issue a writ of mandamus, order of direction commanding and compelling the respondents to consider and dispose of Ext.P1 application of the petitioner within a time frame prescribed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Government Pleader.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that for construction of a apartment building having a plinth area
of 2967 square meters, the petitioner has submitted an
application before the Kozhikode Corporation. The said application
was rejected stating that as per the Town Planning Scheme of the
Corporation, the land of the petitioner is included in the
Agricultural Zone. It is submitted that as per the new master plan
with respect to the Corporation prepared in the year 2016, the
property of the petitioner comes in the residential zone. It is
submitted that the petitioner has submitted Ext.P1 application
under Section 50 of the Kerala Town and Country Planning Act, WP(C) NO. 16473 OF 2021
2016 before the 1st respondent and that the same is liable to be
considered, in accordance with law, at the earliest.
4. The learned Government Pleader submits, on
instructions, that it was only on account of the pandemic and
resultant lock down that there has been some delay in
considering the application and that appropriate steps for
consideration of the application shall be taken without further
delay.
5. There will, accordingly, be a direction to the 1 st
respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P1
representation preferred by the petitioner with notice to the
petitioner and after hearing him through any appropriate means
including video conferencing within a period of two months from
the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE bng/31.08.2021 WP(C) NO. 16473 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16473/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION ALONG WITH RECEIPT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS DATED 21/06/2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!