Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12013 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 26TH CHAITHRA, 1943
Crl.MC.No.1328 OF 2021(E)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CP 34/2016 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF
FIRST CLASS , SASTHAMCOTTA
CRIME NO.1112/2015 OF SOORANADU POLICE STATION , KOLLAM
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 9:
1 KIRAN @ PONNU, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O RADHAKRISHNA
PILLAI, KALEEKKATHARA VEEDU, PADINJATTAM MURI,
SOORANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690520.
2 DEEPU, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O DEVADAS, DEEPU SADANAM,
PADINJATTAM MURI, SOORANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR
TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690520.
3 ANANDHU, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O DEVADAS, DEEPU SADANAM,
PADINJATTAM MURI, SOORANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR
TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690520.
4 JINESH @ KICHU, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O RADHAKRISHNAN,
KARAZHITHARA VEEDU, PADINJATTAM MURI,
SOORANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690520.
5 AMAL @ KANNAN, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O YESHODHARAN,
PAZHOOR PADEETTATHIL VEEDU, PADINJATTAM MURI,
SOORANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690520.
6 DEEPU, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O VIJAYAN,
VIJESH BHAVAN, KUNNITHADAM, NADUVILE MURI,
SOORANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KINNATHOOR TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690520.
7 CHIKKU RAJAN, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O RAJAN,
CHIKKU BHAVANAM, KOIKKALETHU KIZHAKKE COLONY,
THAMARAKULAM THEKKU MURI, THAMARAKULAM VILLAGE,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690530.
Crl MC 1328/21
2
8 THEJAS, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O RAJENDRAN,
THEJAS BHAVAN, PADINJATTAM MURI,
SOORANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690520.
9 ABHIJITH, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O SATHYAN,
ABHIJITH BHAVAN, PADINJATTAM KIZHAKKU MURI,
SOORANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690520.
BY ADVS.
SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN
SRI.KIRANLAL
SRI.R.RAJESH
SRI.T.S.SARATH
SRI.SAMEER M. NAIR
RESPONDENTS/STATE, DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT/INJURED:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM-682031.
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
POLICE STATION OF SOORANADU,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690520.
3 SUMESH KUMAR, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O KUMARAN,
SUMESH BHAVAN, PADIRICKAL MURI,
SOORANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690522.
4 SREEKUMAR, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O BALAKRISHNAN,
THRIVENI(H), PADIRICKAL MURI, SOORANADU NORTH
VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690522.
5 SREEJITH, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O BALAKRISHNAN,
SREELATHA BHAVAN, PADIRICKAL MURI, SOORANADU NORTH
VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690522.
6 THUSHARA, AGED 30 YEARS, W/O SREEJITH,
SREELATHA BHAVAN, PADIRICKAL MURI, SOORANADU NORTH
VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690522
7 RENJINI, AGED 34 YEARS, W/O SREEKUMAR,
THRIVENI (H), PADIRICKAL MURI, SOORANADU NORTH
VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690522
Crl MC 1328/21
3
BY ADVS.
SRI.ANU VARGHESE
SRI C M KAMMAPPU
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl MC 1328/21
4
O R D E R
The petitioners are the accused in C.P.No.34/2016 on
the files of the JFMC (Temp) Court, Sasthamkotta, arising
out of Crime No.1112/2015 of Sooranadu Police Station,
Kollam for having allegedly committed the offences
punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 308
read with S.149 of IPC.
2. The de facto complainant is the 3rd respondent
herein, who, along with respondents 4 to 7, has appeared
through Adv.Anu Varghese and has filed affidavits as
Annexure-A2 to A6 stating that the matter has been
amicably settled and that they have no existing grievance
against the petitioners. The offences alleged are purely
personal in nature and no serious prejudice will be caused
to the public if the settlement is recognised. Further,
possibility of the case ending in conviction is also very
remote, if not impossible due to the said settlement.
Recognising the said settlement augurs better in the
interests of all.
3. Reliance can be placed on the decisions in Gian Crl MC 1328/21
Singh v. State of Punjab [2012 (4) KLT 108], Narinder
Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another
[(2014) 6 SCC 466)] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v.
State of Jharkhand [(2014) 9 SCC 653] for recognizing
the settlement entered into by the parties.
4. In view of the settlement arrived at between the
petitioners and respondents 3 to 7, which is stated by the
investigating officer, as having been voluntarily entered
into, the petitioners are entitled to get the proceedings
quashed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. It is also
pertinent to note that the petitioners do not have any
criminal antecedents and no public interest is involved.
In the result, the Crl.M.C.is allowed and the entire
proceedings against the petitioners in C.P.No.34/2016 on
the files of the JFMC (Temp) Court, Sasthamkotta, arising
out of Crime No.1112/2015 of Sooranadu Police Station,
Kollam stands quashed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS RR JUDGE Crl MC 1328/21
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.1112/2015 OF SOORANADU POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT WHICH IS NOW PENDING AS CP NO.34/2016 ON THE FILES OF JFMC(TEMP.) COURT, SASTHAMKOTTA.
ANNEXURE-A2 THE ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 27/02/2021 SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT.
ANNEXURE-A3 THE ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 27/02/2021 SWORN BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT/CW2.
ANNEXURE-A4 THE ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 27/02/2021 SWORN BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT/CW3.
ANNEXURE-A5 THE ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 27/02/2021 SWORN BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT/CW4.
ANNEXURE-A6 THE ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 27/02/2021 SWORN BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT/CW5.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!