Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11871 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1943
CRL.A.No.225 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC 273/2021 OF SESSIONS
COURT, KOZHIKODE
APPELLANT/S:
SABIN C. BABY,
AGED 33 YEARS,
S/o.C.A BABY, CHILAMBIKUNNEL HOUSE,
KANNADIMUKKU, POOLODE P.O, ENGAPUZHA,
KATTIPPARA PANCHAYATH, THAMARASSERY THALUK,
KOZHIKODE DISTRICT PIN 673 573
BY ADV. SRI.SINU.G.NATH
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE,
REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SUPEERINTENDENT OF
POLICE, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE RURAL BY PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
KOCHI 682 031
2 ADDL.R2 MRS.SUPRIYA, AGED 40 YEARS,
W/O LATE. REJI, KUNNAPPOYIL KUNNU, PULOODU,
PUDUPPADI P.O, KAKKADU B.O, THAMARASSERY,
KOZHIKODE DIST. PIN-673586.
3 ADDL.R3 JINEESH MON,
AGED 26 YEARS,
S/O SANTHOSH, PUZHAMPALIYIL HOUSE, VENAKKAVU,
PUDUPPADI P.O, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE RURAL,
KERALA, PIN-673586.
ADDL.R2 AND R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
30.3.2021 IN CRL.MA 1/2021.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT. M. K. PUSHPALATHA, SR.PP
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
09.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Crl.Appl.No.225 of 2021
-2-
JUDGMENT
The appellant is the accused in Crime
No.1174/2020 of Thamarassery Police Station
registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 302 and 307 IPC and Section 3(2)
(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2. The prosecution allegation is
that on 20.12.2020 at 5.10 p.m., the
appellant, who is not a member of the
Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe, stabbed the
deceased, who was a member of the Scheduled
Caste, with the intention to kill him and as
a consequence, he succumbed to the injuries
on the same day. In the incident, the Crl.Appl.No.225 of 2021
nephew of the deceased also sustained
injuries on his left shoulder when he tried
to intervene.
3. The appellant was arrested on
21.12.2020 and ever since he has been in
custody.
4. Heard.
5. The learned Senior Public
Prosecutor has no serious objection in
granting bail to the appellant.
6. It has been submitted by the
learned Senior Public Prosecutor that the
final report had been already filed by the
police after completing the investigation.
It appears that the court below had Crl.Appl.No.225 of 2021
dismissed the application mainly on the
reason that the investigation was not
complete. Now the investigation is over and
the final report had been already filed.
The appellant is not involved in any other
offence, submitted by the learned Senior
Public Prosecutor.
7. Considering the facts and
circumstances of the case, including the
fact that the appellant is a first time
offender and also taking into consideration
of the fact that the final report had been
already filed, I am of the view that the
further detention of the appellant is not
necessary in this case.
Crl.Appl.No.225 of 2021
In the result, this Criminal Appeal
stands allowed setting aside the order
impugned and the court below is directed to
release the appellant on bail on his
executing a bond for Rs.40,000/- (Rupees
Forty thousand only) with two solvent
sureties, each for the like sum to the
satisfaction of the court below and subject
to the following further conditions:-
(i) The appellant shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses, who are likely to give evidence before the court.
(ii) The appellant shall co- operate with the trial.
Crl.Appl.No.225 of 2021
(iii) The appellant shall not get involved in any other offence during the pendency of this case.
sd/-
B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE STK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!