Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11392 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
THURSDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.9167 OF 2021(U)
PETITIONER:
VINEETHA P.V
AGED 34 YEARS
W/O R.REGHU, RESIDING AT NIYATHY, ALLAPRA P.O.
THOTTAPADAN JUNCTION, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT-683 556.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH M.P.
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION,
KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682 013.
2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
MUVATTUPUZHA-686 661.
3 THE TAHSILDAR,
TALUK OFFICE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR
P.O.PIN-683 550.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
CHELAMATTOM VILLAGE, OKKAL P.O.
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 550.
5 THE CONVENER,
LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE AND AGRICULTURAL
OFFICER, OKKAL KRISHI BHAVAN, OKKAL P.O.
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 550.
6 OKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
OKKAL P.O.ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY-683 550.
7 THE PRESIDENT,
OKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT, OKKAL P.O.
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 550.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
SATHISH NINAN, J.
==================
W. P. (C) No.9167 of 2021
==================
Dated this the 8th day of April, 2021
JUDGMENT
All that the petitioner seeks for is an
expeditious disposal of Ext.P6 application filed in
form No.5 under the provisions of the Kerala
Conservation of Paddy land and Weltand Act. The
property of the petitioner has a total extent of 8
Ares and 10 Sq. M. Out of the same, an extent of 6
Ares and 10 Sq. M. is remaining as 'Nilam' and the
remaining as 'Purayidom'. According to the
petitioner, the entry regarding the nature of the
property as 'Nilam' is a mistake and the same needs
to be corrected. The property of the petitioner was
lying as reclaimed land even prior to the coming
into force of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy land
and Wetland Act, 2008, contends the petitioner.
2. Without expressing anything on merits, the
writ petition is disposed of directing the second
respondent to consider Ext.P6 application (Form
NO.5) on obtaining necessary reports and confirming W. P. (C) No.9167 of 2021
the identity of the properties, as expeditiously as
possible and at any rate within a period of four
months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN JUDGE
kns/-
//True Copy// P.S. to Judge WP(C).No.9167 OF 2021(U)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TILE DEED DATED 4.4.2013
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 14.1.2021 EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF LAND TAX
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 24.8.2017.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DEPOSIT SLIP DATED 18.6.2018 EVIDENCING THE AMOUNT DEPOSITED IN FAVOUR OF THE DIRECTOR K.S.R.E.C TRIBVANDRUM BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH FEDERAL BANK, KALADY BRANCH
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 22.2.2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE PRESCRIBED PERFORMA
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 19.3.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE PRESCRIBED PERFORMA
-----
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!