Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11373 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
THURSDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(Crl.).No.92 OF 2021
PETITIONER/
NIKHIL A.
AGED 27 YEARS
S/O. SURENDERAN M., RESIDING AT ELETTIL HOUSE,
SIVAPURAM, EEYADU, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE
DISTRICT - 673 573.
BY ADVS.
SRI.LUIZ GODWIN D COUTH
SRI.JOSE KURIAKOSE (VILANGATTIL)
SRI.BIJO FRANCIS
RESPONDENTS/
1 SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
KOZHIKODE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
PUDUPANAM, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 105.
2 S. I. OF POLICE
BALUSSERY, KOZHIKODE - 673 613.
3 CHANDRAN K. K.
KOMMACHAMKANDY HOUSE, SIVAPURAM, EEYADU,
THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 573.
OTHER PRESENT:
SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.B.RAMANAND
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
08.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(Crl).92 of 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated : 8th April, 2021
K.Vinod Chandran, J.
1. The petitioner seeks production of the daughter
of the 3rd respondent, his wife, by issuance of a
writ of Habeas Corpus. It is his contention that
on 25.2.2021 his wife was taken from her marital
home, forcibly by the 3rd respondent. After the
said date the petitioner has had no communication
with his wife . The 3rd respondent is said to have
informed the petitioner's mother that he does not
intend to send his daughter back to the marital
home.
2. By interim order dated 25.3.2021, we directed the
2nd respondent to get a statement of the alleged
detenue, through a Woman Police Officer without
the presence of the alleged detenue's parents or
family members. Today the statement has been
produced by the 2nd respondent as recorded by a WP(Crl).92 of 2021
Woman Civil Police Officer and signed by the
alleged detenue.
3. The daughter of the 3rd respondent in her
statement recorded by a Woman Civil Police
Officer admits the relationship as also having
entered into a marriage without the knowledge of
her parents. However, even after the marriage, as
evinced from her statement, she was living with
her parents. When the 3rd respondent came to know
of her relationship and objected to it, she told
him about the marriage conducted, upon which he
made enquiries about the petitioner. It is the
statement of the daughter of the 3rd respondent
that it was revealed, from the enquiries made by
her father, that the petitioner is now
unemployed. The petitioner, according to her, had
informed her that he had a salaried job. It is
also revealed that the residential home of the
petitioner is under recovery proceedings.
Realizing that the petitioner would be unable to WP(Crl).92 of 2021
maintain her, she does not intend to continue her
relationship. She categorically states that
despite she having gone through a form of
marriage, she has not lived with the petitioner
as a wife. It is also her categoric statement
that she is not illegally detained nor is she
under any threat from her parents. We find no
reason to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus.
4. The writ petition stands dismissed.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge
Sd/-
M.R.ANITHA, Judge
Mrcs/8.4. xxx WP(Crl).92 of 2021
APPENDIX
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONER AND SMT. ADITHYA (DETENUE) ISSUED BY SREE VAIRAGI MUTH, KOZHIKODE.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL LEAVING CERTIFICATE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA EVIDENCING THE AGE OF THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL LEAVING CERTIFICATE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA EVIDENCING THE AGE OF THE ADITHYA M. C. (DETENUE).
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 01.03.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!