Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Timmana Gowda vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 2039 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2039 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Timmana Gowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 March, 2026

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                                  -1-
                                                             NC: 2026:KHC-K:2215
                                                          WP No. 201024 of 2026


                      HC-KAR




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                         KALABURAGI BENCH

                               DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 201024 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)

                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SRI TIMMANA GOWDA
                            S/O LATE SRI AMARESHAPPA,
                            AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
                            H.NO., 4TH CROSS, JANATHA COLONLY,
                            HATTIGUDDA VILLAGE AND POST,
                             SINDHANUR TALUK, RAICHUR-584132.,
                            R/O NO.49, BASANTHARA LAYOUT 2,
                            CHEEMASANDRA, BANGALORE NORTH,
                            BENGALURU-560049.

                      2.    SMT. MALLAMMA
                            W/O HANUMANTHA REDDY,
                            D/O LATE SRI AMARESHAPPA,
Digitally signed by
                            AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
SWETA KULKARNI              H.NO., 4TH CROSS, JANATHA COLONLY,
Location: HIGH              HATTIGUDDA VILLAGE AND POST,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                   SINDHANUR TALUK, RAICHUR-584132.,
                            R/O WARD NO.2, BAVI ONI, YARRINGLIGI,
                            YARRINGLIGI, BALLARY-583115.

                      3.    SMT. AMARAMMA
                            W/O SANGANA GOWDA,
                            D/O LATE SRI AMARESHAPPA,
                            AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
                            H.NO., 4TH CROSS, JANATHA COLONLY,
                            HATTIGUDDA VILLAGE AND POST,
                            SINDHANUR TALUK, RAICHUR-584132.
                            R/O H.NO.103, GUDADINNI, GUDADINNI K,
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2026:KHC-K:2215
                                   WP No. 201024 of 2026


HC-KAR




     RAICHUR-584123.

4.   SMT. G. UMADEVI
     W/O BASAVARAJA,
     D/O LATE SRI AMARESHAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
     H.NO., 4TH CROSS, JANATHA COLONLY,
     HATTIGUDDA VILLAGE AND POST,
     SINDHANUR TALUK, RAICHUR-584132.,
     R/O NO.938, ESHWARA TEMPLE ONI,
     YARRINGLIGI, YARRINGLIGI, BALLARY-583115.

                                            ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
     DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING,
     BENGALURU - 560001.

2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
     RAICHUR DISTRICT, RAICHUR - 584101.

3.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
     RAICHUR SUB-DIVISION,
     RAICHUR - 584101.

4.   THE TAHASILDAR,
     SINDHANUR TALUK,
     RAICHUR DISTRICT-584128.

5.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
     REPRESENTED BY TURVIHAL POLICE STATION,
     TURVIHAL, SINDHANUR TALUK,
     RAICHUR DIST-584132.

                                           ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VIRANAGOUDA M. BIRADAR, AGA)
                                -3-
                                             NC: 2026:KHC-K:2215
                                         WP No. 201024 of 2026


HC-KAR




     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO- A)
ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE
WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.4 TAHASILDAR
SINDHANUR TALUK RAICHUR DISTRICT TO CONSIDER AND
DISPOSE OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10.02.2026
SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS SEEKING RESTORATION/
INSERTION OF THEIR NAMES IN THE RTC AND OTHER
REVENUE RECORDS PERTAINING TO LAND BEARING SY NO.
51/B (SY NO. 51/*/2), TOTALLY MEASURING 6 ACRES 04
GUNTAS OUT OF WHICH AN EXTENT OF 4 ACRES 14 GUNTAS
IS PRESENTLY SHOWN IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNMENT
AND THE REMAINING EXTENT STANDS IN THE NAME OF THE
PETITIONERS FATHER SITUATED AT HATTIGUDDA VILALGE
SINDHANUR TALUK RAICHUR DISTRICT AND TO PASS
APPROPRIATE ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW WITHIN A
TIME FRAME TO BE FIXED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. B) GRANT
SUCH OTHER WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS
HONOURABLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY



                         ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioners are before this Court in this writ

petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with

a prayer to direct the respondent No.4-Tahasildar to consider

and dispose of their representation dated 10.02.2026, wherein,

they have requested to insert their name in the revenue

records of the land bearing Survey No.51/B, totally measuring

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2215

HC-KAR

6 acres 4 guntas, situated at Hattigudda village, Sindhanur

taluk, Raichur district.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

the learned Additional Government Advocate who is directed to

take notice for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that, their father

Amareshappa S/o. Timmareddeppa Krishnapur was the

absolute owner of the aforesaid laid and though the State

Government had passed an order in respect of the aforesaid

land declaring the same as a excess land under the Karnataka

Land Reforms Act, 1961, the petitioners have continued in

possession of the said land till date and it is under these

circumstances, they had filed an application at Annexure-H

dated 09.02.2026 which is received in the Office of the

Tahasildar i.e. respondent No.4 on 10.02.2026. The grievance

of the petitioners is that, till date such an application is not

considered.

4. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits

that, if the said application is not considered and disposed of till

date, the respondent No.4-Tahasildar shall consider the same

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2215

HC-KAR

and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, if some

breathing time is granted.

5. His submission is placed on record.

6. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the

respondent No.4-Tahasildar to consider the representation of

the petitioners at Annexure-H dated 09.02.2026 which was

received in the Office of the Tahasildar on 10.02.2026 and

dispose of the same by passing appropriate orders in

accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, but not later

than a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy

of this order.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

SVH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter