Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishwanatha @ Vishwa vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 458 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 458 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2026

[Cites 15, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Vishwanatha @ Vishwa vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 January, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                    -1-
                                                                NC: 2026:KHC:4049
                                                          CRL.P No. 16572 of 2025


                       HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                                CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16572 OF 2025
                                     [(439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)]
                      BETWEEN:
                      1.    VISHWANATHA @ VISHWA
                            S/O. BASAVARAJAPPA,
                            AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
                            OCC : AGRICULTURIST,
                      2.    PRASANNAKUMAR @ PRASANNA,
                            S/O BASAVARAJAPPA,
                            AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
                            OCC: AGRICULTURIST,
                      3.    BASAVARAJAPPA,
                            S/O LATE CHIGATERAPPA,
                            AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
                            OCC : AGRICULTURIST,
                            ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF
                            KONANURU VILLAGE, CHITRADURGA TALUK,
                            CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 541.
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA                                                ...PETITIONERS
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH        (BY SRI. C.H. JADHAV, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
COURT OF
KARNATAKA             SRI. CHETAN JADHAV, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                            THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                            BY BHARAMASAGAR P.S.,
                            REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                            HIGH COURT BUILDING,
                            BENGALURU - 560 001.
                                                                ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. M.R. PATEIL, HCGP)
                                 -2-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC:4049
                                        CRL.P No. 16572 of 2025


HC-KAR




       THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED
UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO RELEASE THE
PETITIONERS ON BAIL WHO ARE ACCUSED NOS.5, 7 AND 11
IN CRIME NO.415/2024 REGISTERED BY BHARAMASAGAR
POLICE STATION, WHICH IS NOW S.C.NO.105/2025 PENDING
ON THE FILE OF SPECIAL II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS        JUDGE,    CHITRADURGA     FOR    THE   OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352,
351(2), 351(3), 103(1), 117(2), 109(1), 115(2), 118(2),
189(2), 189(4) AND 329(4) OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA
(BNS), 2023 BY IMPOSING ANY REASONABLE CONDITIONS.

       THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                           ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused Nos.5, 7 and 11

under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 praying to grant bail in S.C.No.105/2025 (Crime

No.415/2024 of Bharamasagara Police Station), registered

for offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3),

190, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 103(1), 117(2), 109(1),

115(2), 118(2), 189(2), 189(4) and 329(4) of Bharatiya

NC: 2026:KHC:4049

HC-KAR

Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending on the file of Special II

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga.

2. Heard learned Senior Counsel for petitioners

and learned High Court Government Pleader for

respondent - State.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for petitioners would

contend that, accused Nos.1 to 3 have been granted bail

by this Court in Criminal Petition No.503/2025 and

Criminal Petition No.12594/2025. The petitioners are also

similarly placed to that of those accused persons who have

been granted bail and therefore they are entitled for grant

of bail on the ground of parity. On these grounds, he

prayed to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader for respondent would contend that, the serious

overtact of assault is alleged against the petitioners. There

are eyewitnesses to the incident. The charge sheet

materials show that, there is a prima-facie case against

NC: 2026:KHC:4049

HC-KAR

the petitioners for offences alleged against them. The

offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable

either with death or imprisonment for life. With these, he

prayed for dismissal of the petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels appearing

for parties, the Court has perused the charge sheet and

other materials placed on record.

6. This Court while granting bail to accused Nos.1

and 3 passed in Criminal Petition No.12594/2025 by order

dated 12.11.2025 has observed as under:

"7. The case of the prosecution is that deceased Manjunath has enticed CW.17, the daughter of accused Nos.1 and 2 and married her on 07.10.2024 and therefore, all the accused are angry with the same and intended to take revenge against the deceased and his parents. The accused persons on 27.11.2024 went to the house of the deceased, holding weapons. Accused Nos.5 and 11 holding wooden repiece entered the house of deceased Manjunath and assaulted deceased Manjunath and dragged him outside the house. Accused No.11 with wooden repiece and crowbar,

NC: 2026:KHC:4049

HC-KAR

accused No.2 with size stone, iron chain and chappal, accused No.5 with wooden repiece, accused No.7 with wooden repiece, accused No.3 with iron crowbar, accused No.1 with machete, size stone and crowbar, accused No.13 with wooden repiece, accused No.14 with hands and legs, accused Nos. 6, 8 with hands and legs, accused Nos.9 and 10 with cart peg, hands and legs, accused Nos. 4, 12 and 15 assaulted deceased with hands. All abused the deceased and CWs.1 and 2 and assaulted them on their body and head with an intention to kill them. Deceased - Manjunath has sustained severe injuries and he died on the way to hospital. CW1 and CW2 have sustained grievous injuries. The deceased was aged 40 years as on the date of the incident and CW.17 was the daughter of accused Nos.1 and 2 and was aged 19 years. The deceased enticed CW.17 and married her. Deceased

- Manjunath was accused in S.C.No.41/2020 and he has been convicted for offence under Section 306 of IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 6 years and fine of Rs.10,000/- by judgment dated 23.01.2024. The charge against the deceased in the said case was that his wife Shilpa committed suicide by hanging and this deceased has abetted his wife to commit suicide. The marriage of deceased with the said Shilpa was love marriage. Considering the said aspect, learned Senior counsel for the

NC: 2026:KHC:4049

HC-KAR

petitioners submits that deceased was in the habit of enticing girls and marrying them and subsequently, torturing them.

8. Accused No.2 is mother of CW17 and wife of accused No.1 and she has been granted bail in Crl.P.No.503/2025 by order dated 12.02.2025. The accusation against accused No.2 is that she assaulted deceased with size stone on his head and caused injury. The accusation against the petitioners/accused No.1 and accused No.3 is that accused No.1 assaulted with machete, size stone and crowbar, accused No.3 assaulted with a crowbar. Petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 3 herein are similarly placed to that of accused No.2, who has been granted bail. On perusal of the charge sheet there are 79 witnesses cited as charge sheet witnesses. The petitioners are in judicial custody since 30.11.2024. Considering the number of witnesses, the trial will take considerable time. The petitioners have undertaken to appear before the trial Court on all dates of hearing and not to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. Considering the above aspects, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of bail with conditions."

NC: 2026:KHC:4049

HC-KAR

Accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 have been granted bail and

the accusation against them is that accused No2 with size

stone, accused No.3 with iron crowbar and accused No.1

with machete, size stone and crowbar assaulted the

deceased. The petitioners i.e., accused No.5 assaulted

with wooden repiece, accused No.7 also assaulted with

wooden repiece and accused No.1 also assaulted with

wooden repiece and crowbar on the deceased. The

overtact alleged against the petitioners is similar to that of

accused Nos.1 to 3 who have been granted bail. Therefore,

the petitioners are entitled for grant of bail on the ground

of parity. The petitioners have undertaken to appear

before the trial Court on all dates of hearing and not to

tamper with the prosecution witnesses. There are no

criminal antecedents of the petitioners.

7. Considering all the above aspects, the

petitioners have made out a case for grant of bail with

conditions. In the result, the following;

NC: 2026:KHC:4049

HC-KAR

ORDER The Criminal petition is allowed. The

petitioners/accused Nos.5, 7 and 11 are granted bail in

S.C.No.105/2025 (Crime No.415/2024 of Bharamasagar

Police Station) pending on the file of Special II Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, subject to

following conditions:

(i) Petitioners shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) each with one surety for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

(ii) Petitioners shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses.

(iii) Petitioners shall attend the trial Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted and co-operate for speedy disposal of the case.

(iv) Petitioners shall not commit any offence.

                If   a   case     registered      against   the

                                              NC: 2026:KHC:4049



 HC-KAR




petitioners for committing any offence, the prosecution is at liberty to seek cancellation of bail granted to them.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter