Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. P Kalpana vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1309 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1309 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt. P Kalpana vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                 -1-
                                                                 NC: 2026:KHC:9303
                                                        CRL.P No. 17239 of 2025
                                                    C/W CRL.P No. 17103 of 2025
                                                        CRL.P No. 17283 of 2025
                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION No. 17239 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) /
                                             482(BNSS))
                                                C/W
                                CRIMINAL PETITION No. 17103 OF 2025
                                CRIMINAL PETITION No. 17283 OF 2025


                      IN CRL.P No. 17239/2025

                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SRI. MANJUNATH
                            S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA
                            AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
                            R/AT HENNAGARA GATE
                            HENNAGARA VILLAGE AND POST
                            ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 106.

Digitally signed by   2.    SRI.MANJUNATH M.V
LAKSHMINARAYANA             S/O VENKATASWAMY
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH              AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
COURT OF                    R/AT No.87, MARUTHI LAYOUT
KARNATAKA
                            NEAR BUS STAND, ANEKAL TOWN
                            BENGALURU - 562 106.
                                                                    ...PETITIONERS

                      (BY SRI LOKESH B, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            THROUGH ANEKAL POLICE STATION
                           -2-
                                        NC: 2026:KHC:9303
                                CRL.P No. 17239 of 2025
                            C/W CRL.P No. 17103 of 2025
                                CRL.P No. 17283 of 2025
HC-KAR




   REP. BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PLEADER
   HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
   BENGALURU - 560 001.
                                           ...RESPONDENT

(BY SRI HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP)

      THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 Cr.PC (FILED
UNDER     SECTION    482   BNNS)  PRAYING   TO    GRANT
ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONER IN CRIME
No.379/2025 OF ANEKAL POLICE STATION (REGISTERED
BEFORE THE III ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SITTING AT ANEKAL) FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 192(A) OF THE
KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964, AND SECTION 316(4),
336(3), 318(4), 336(2), 340(2) R/W SECTION 3(5) OF BNS
2023.

IN CRL.P No. 17103/2025

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. NARAYANA
S/O LATE VENKATESH
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT
No.124, 3RD CROSS, VENKATESHWARA LAYOUT
ANEKAL TOWN, BENGALURU-562 106.
                                            ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI P B UMESH, ADVOCATE FOR
 SRI R. B.DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH S.H.O., ANEKAL POLICE STATION
REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001.
                                          ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP)
                           -3-
                                         NC: 2026:KHC:9303
                                   CRL.P No. 17239 of 2025
                               C/W CRL.P No. 17103 of 2025
                                   CRL.P No. 17283 of 2025
HC-KAR




    THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 (FILED UNDER
SECTION 482 BNSS)         Cr.P.C    PRAYING TO GRANT
ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONER IN CRIME
No.379/2025 REGISTERED BY ANEKAL POLICE STATION,
REGISTERED BEFORE THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SIT AT ANEKAL FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 192(A) OF
KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 AND SECTIONS 316(4),
336(2), 340(2) R/W SECTION 3(5) OF BNS, 2023.

N CRL.P No. 17283/2025

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. P KALPANA
W/O THUKARAM.B.M
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/AT BASAVANNA LAYOUT
NEAR KARAGADAMMA TEMPLE
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BANGALORE - 562 107.
                                             ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. LOKESH B, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH S.H.O, ANEKAL POLICE STATION
REPD. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001.
                                            ...RESPONDENT

(BY SRI HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP)

   THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 Cr.P.C (UNDER
SECTION 482 BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL
TO THE PETITIONER IN CR.No.379/2025 OF ANEKAL P.S.,
PENDING BEFORE THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
                             -4-
                                         NC: 2026:KHC:9303
                                  CRL.P No. 17239 of 2025
                              C/W CRL.P No. 17103 of 2025
                                  CRL.P No. 17283 of 2025
HC-KAR




JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SITTING AT ANEKAL,
FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 192(A) OF
THE   KARNATAKA      LAND    REVENUE    ACT,   1964,   U/S
316(4),336(3),318(4),336(2),340(2) R/W 3(5) OF BNS, 2023.

    THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                      ORAL ORDER

Criminal Petition No.17239/2025 is filed by accused

Nos.12 and 16, Criminal Petition No.17283/2025 is filed by

accused No.11 and Criminal Petition No.17103/2025 is

filed by accused No.9. All the three petitions are filed

under Section 482 of BNSS seeking grant of anticipatory

bail in Crime No.379/2025 of Anekal Police Station

registered for offences punishable under Section 192A of

Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and Sections 316(4),

336(3), 318(4), 336(2), 340(2) read with Section 3(5) of

BNS.

2. Heard learned counsels for petitioners and

learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent

-State.

NC: 2026:KHC:9303

HC-KAR

3. Learned counsel for petitioners would contend

that there is no role of petitioners in missing of the

documents and creation of the documents. The petitioners

are not custodians of the documents. Accused Nos.1,2, 4,

7, 13 and 15 have been granted anticipatory bail by this

Court. Therefore, the petitioners are also entitled for grant

of anticipatory bail on the ground of parity. The petitioners

are ready to co-operate with the Investigating Officer in

the investigation and abide by any conditions to be

imposed by this Court. With these, they prayed to allow

the petitions.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader for the respondent -State would contend that

investigation is in progress. The offence alleged against

the petitioners are provided with sentence of

imprisonment which may extend upto 07 years. The

allegation against the accused persons is helping the land

grabbers by creating and forging the documents and

NC: 2026:KHC:9303

HC-KAR

missing of the records from the office. With these, he

prayed for dismissal of the petitions.

5. Having heard learned counsels appearing for

parties, the Court has perused FIR, complaint and other

materials placed on record.

6. This court while granting anticipatory bail to

accused Nos.1, 2, 4, 7, 13 and 15 in the order dated

19.01.2026 passed in Criminal Petition No.17369/2025

and other connected matters as observed as under:

"10. The FIR was registered on 28.11.2025 alleging commission of offence between 14.10.2025 and 28.11.2025. The allegation in the complaint pertains to the missing of certain documents and the creation of documents. The question as to who was the custodian of the said documents at the relevant point of time is a matter of record. The offences alleged against the petitioners are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life. The petitioners have undertaken to cooperate with the Investigating Officer in investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed by this

NC: 2026:KHC:9303

HC-KAR

Court. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners."

The petitioners who are working as F.D.A, S.D.A and

Group D employees in Anekal Taluk Office are similarly

placed to that of other accused persons who have already

been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Petitioners

have undertaken to co-operate with Investigating Officer

in the investigation and abide by any conditions to be

imposed by this Court. Offences alleged against petitioners

are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for

life. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners.

Considering the above aspects, petitioners have made out

case for grant of anticipatory bail with conditions.

7. In the result, the following

ORDER

i) All the three criminal petitions are allowed.

ii) Petitioners -accused Nos.9, 11, 12 and 16 are

ordered to be released on bail in the event of

NC: 2026:KHC:9303

HC-KAR

their arrest in Crime No.379/2025 of Anekal

Police Station subject to following conditions:

a) Petitioners -accused Nos. 9, 11, 12 and 16

shall voluntarily appear before the

Investigating Officer within fifteen days from

this day and execute bail bond for a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- each with one surety for the

like sum to the satisfaction of the

Investigating Officer.

b) Petitioners -accused Nos. 9, 11, 12 and 16

shall appear before the Investigating Officer

whenever called for and cooperate for

investigation.

c) Petitioners -accused Nos. 9, 11, 12 and 16

shall appear before the Investigating Officer

on first and third Sunday of every month for

a period of two months or till filing of final

report whichever is earlier.

NC: 2026:KHC:9303

HC-KAR

d) Petitioners -accused Nos. 9, 11, 12 and 16

shall not directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade them from disclosing such facts to

the Court or to any police officer or tamper

with the evidence.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DSP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10 Ct.sm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter