Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Mamatha G Rai vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 1194 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1194 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2026

[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Mamatha G Rai vs State Of Karnataka on 12 February, 2026

                                                  -1-
                                                                NC: 2026:KHC:8552
                                                            WP No. 13877 of 2021
                                                        C/W WP No. 13476 of 2021
                                                            WP No. 13552 of 2021
                    HC-KAR



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                              BEFORE
                                 THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
                             WRIT PETITION NO. 13877 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
                                               C/W
                             WRIT PETITION NO. 13476 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
                             WRIT PETITION NO. 13552 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

                   IN WP NO. 13877/2021

                   BETWEEN:
                   ABHISHEK RAI
                   S/O GUNAPALA RAI,
                   AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
                   R/AT D NO.4-217A,
                   RADHUKATTE HOUSE,
                   VITTALAPADNURU, KODANGAI
                   POST, DAKSHINA KANNADA,
                   KARNATAKA - 574 253
                   PRESENTLY R/AT FLAT NO.109,
                   KRISHNA HERITAGE, B.C. ROAD,
                   BANTWAL TALUK - 574 153
Digitally signed                                                     ...PETITIONER
by PRASHANTH
NV                 (BY SRI. AJAY PRABHU M., ADVOCATE)
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka          AND:
                   1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
                        MANGALORE EAST POLICE
                        STATION, REPRESENTED BY
                        STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                        HIGH COURT BUILDING,
                        BANGALORE - 01

                   2.   SMT. POORNIMA RAI,
                        W/O ABHISHEK RAI,
                        AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
                        TRIVENI NILAYA, SCHOOL ROAD,
                        VITTLA BANTWALA TALUK-574153
                                -2-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC:8552
                                          WP No. 13877 of 2021
                                      C/W WP No. 13476 of 2021
                                          WP No. 13552 of 2021
 HC-KAR



     DAKSHINA KANAADA
                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R, HCGP FOR R1
     SRI. PONNANNA M.B., ADVOCATE FOR
     SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA K.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS CRIME NO.116
OF 2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VI JMFC COURT, MANGALURU CITY,
DAKSHINA    KANNADA     FOR   THE    OFFENCE   PUNISHABLE   UNDER
SECTION 498A, 497, 494, 307, 506, 120 R/W 3, 4 OF IPC AND
SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT AS PER ANNX-A.
AND ETC.,

IN WP NO. 13476/2021

BETWEEN:
1.   SMT. MAMATHA G RAI
     W/O GUNAPALA RAI
     AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
     R/AT D.NO.4-217A
     RADHUKATTE HOUSE,
     VITTLAPANDNURU,
     KODANGAI POST,
     DAKSHINA KANNADA,
     KARNATAKA - 574 243

2.   ATHMIK RAI
     S/O GUNAPALA RAI
     AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
     R/AT D.NO.4-217A
     RADHUKATTE HOUSE,
     VITTLAPADNURU,
     KODANGAI POST,
     DAKSHINA KANNADA,
     KARNATAKA-574 243

3.   AKHIL RAI
     S/O GUNAPALA RAI
                              -3-
                                              NC: 2026:KHC:8552
                                        WP No. 13877 of 2021
                                    C/W WP No. 13476 of 2021
                                        WP No. 13552 of 2021
 HC-KAR



     AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
     R/AT D.NO.4-217A
     RADHUKATTE HOUSE,
     VITTLAPANDNURU,
     KODANGAI POST,
     DAKSHINA KANNADA,
     KARNATAKA-574 243.

     ALL THE ABOVE PETITIONER
     PRESENTLY R/AT FLAT NO.109,
     KRISHNA HERITAGE, B.C. ROAD,
     BANTWAL TALUK - 574 153.
                                                  ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. AJAY PRABHU M., ADVOCATE)

AND:
1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
     MANGALORE EAST POLICE
     STATION, REPRESENTED BY
     STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
     HIGH COURT BUILDING,
     BANGALORE - 01

2.   SMT. POORNIMA RAI,
     W/O ABHISHEK RAI,
     AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
     TRIVENI NILAYA, SCHOOL ROAD,
     VITTLA BANTWALA TALUK-574153
     DAKSHINA KANAADA
                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R, HCGP FOR R1
     SRI. PONNANNA M.B., ADVOCATE FOR
     SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA K.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

       THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS CRIME NO.116
OF 2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VI JMFC COURT, MANGALURU CITY,
DAKSHINA    KANNADA   FOR   THE    OFFENCE   PUNISHABLE   UNDER
SECTION 498A, 497, 494, 307, 506, 120 R/W 3, 4 OF IPC AND
                              -4-
                                           NC: 2026:KHC:8552
                                       WP No. 13877 of 2021
                                   C/W WP No. 13476 of 2021
                                       WP No. 13552 of 2021
 HC-KAR



SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-
A IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS. AND ETC.,

IN WP NO. 13552/2021

BETWEEN:
1.   PRIYANKA SHETTY
     D/O VENUGOPALA SHETTY
     AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
     R/AT D.NO.1-92, PELAMPADI
     HOUSE, PUDU VILLAGE AND POST,
     BANTWAL, D.K. - 574 143

2.   VENUGOPAL GOWDA
     S/O VENU GOPAL SHETTY,
     AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
     R/AT D.NO.1-92, PELAMPADI
     HOUSE, PUDU VILLAGE AND POST,
     BANTWAL D.K. - 574 143

3.   SARALA SHETTY
     W/O VENUGOPALA SHETTY,
     AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
     R/AT D.NO.1-92, PELAMPADI
     HOUSE, PUDU VILLAGE AND POST,
     BANTWAL D.K. - 574 143

4.   PRADEEP ALVA
     S/O RAMANATHA ALVA,
     R/AT FLAT NO.701,
     ABHIMAN APARTMENT,
     NEAR S.C.S. HOSPITAL,
     BENDOORWELL,
     MANGALURU - 575 002.
                                               ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. AJAY PRABHU M., ADVOCATE)

AND:
1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
     MANGALORE EAST POLICE
     STATION, REPRESENTED BY
     STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
     HIGH COURT BUILDING,
                                   -5-
                                                   NC: 2026:KHC:8552
                                             WP No. 13877 of 2021
                                         C/W WP No. 13476 of 2021
                                             WP No. 13552 of 2021
 HC-KAR



     BANGALORE - 01

2.   SMT. POORNIMA RAI,
     W/O ABHISHEK RAI,
     AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
     TRIVENI NILAYA, SCHOOL ROAD,
     VITTLA BANTWALA TALUK-574153
     DAKSHINA KANAADA
                                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R, HCGP FOR R1
     SRI. PONNANNA M.B., ADVOCATE FOR
     SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA K.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS CRIME NO.116
OF 2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VI JMFC COURT, MANGALURU CITY,
DAKSHINA     KANNADA    FOR   THE       OFFENCE   PUNISHABLE       UNDER
SECTION 498A, 497, 494, 307, 506, 120 R/W 3, 4 OF IPC AND
SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-
A IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS. AND ETC.,

      THESE    WRIT   PETITIONS,    COMING        ON    FOR     HEARING    -
INTERLOCUTORY APPLN, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:

CORAM:      HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA


                      ORAL COMMON ORDER
      Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo

along with certified copy of the memorandum of agreement

filed under Section 89 of CPC R/w Rules 24 and 25 of the

Karnataka     Civil   Procedure     (Mediation)        Rules,    2007     in
                                 -6-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC:8552
                                          WP No. 13877 of 2021
                                      C/W WP No. 13476 of 2021
                                          WP No. 13552 of 2021
HC-KAR



MC.No.26/2025 before the learned Principal Family Judge, D.K.,

Mangaluru.


     2.      The memorandum of agreement reads as under:

     "MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION
     89 OF THE CODE OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE READ
     WITH RULES 24 AND 25 OF THE KARNATAKA
     CIVIL PROCEDURE (MEDIATION) RULES, 2007.

     The Parties above name submits as follows:

            The aforesaid petition for divorce filed under
     Section 13(1), (ia), (ib) and (1A) (ii) of the Hindu
     Marriage Act 1955 was referred to mediation for
     resolving the disputes between the parties. In the
     Course of mediation, both the Petitioner and the
     Respondent have resolved their disputes and have
     agreed to the following terms and conditions:

   1. That the Petitioner and Respondent have married on
      18.05.2011 at Shri Mangaladevi Temple, Mangalore as
      per the rites and customs prevailing in Hindu
      Community and that the marriage was Registered under
      the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 as per
      Certificate No. MGT-HM93-2010-11 registered on
      02.06.2010. That the marriage between the Petitioner
      and the Respondent was love marriage held in the
      presents of few of friends and relatives of both the
      parties.

   2. That after the marriage both the petitioner and the
      Respondent lived together as husband and wife and
      resided at rented premises for about 8 years and there
      is no issues out of their wedlock.

   3. Gradually as days past difference were arisen and it was
      revealed to them that they cannot live along happily due
      to the strong temperamental differences. In spite of the
      best efforts and attempts there was no harmonies
      relation between them and hence both the Petitioner
      and Respondent not residing together since from
      December 2019.
                                 -7-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC:8552
                                          WP No. 13877 of 2021
                                      C/W WP No. 13476 of 2021
                                          WP No. 13552 of 2021
HC-KAR



  4. That during the mediation both the Petitioner and
    Respondent have not come to a centre decision to
    resolve their dispute and live together. Therefore both
    the Petitioner and Respondent finally decided to dissolve
    their marriage and live separately under following
    conditions:

  a) That the petitioner shall agreed to pay a sum of Rs.
     11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lakh only) to the
     respondent towards the final and complete life time
     maintenance of the respondent as permanent alimony
     by way of Demand Draft drawn on Nationalised Bank
     before the Hon'ble Family Court at the time of evidence.

  b) That the Petitioner agreed to release his undivided half
     right in the immovable Property situated in Sy.No.
     53/1P. (As per RTC 53/1P2), converted measuring 3.85
     cents of Kunjathbail Village, Surathkal Hobli, Magnalore
     Taluk in favour of the respondent by way of Registered
     Release Deed. All the expenses relating to the execution
     of the release Deed, Stamp Duty etc,, shall be borne by
     the Respondent herself. The above Release Deed shall
     be executed after withdrawing all the pending litigation.
     Further the Petitioner agreed to provide his Aadhar
     Card, Photo and PAN Card Copy to the Respondent to
     enable her to update the E-Khata relating to the above
     property.

  c) That the Petitioner shall agreed to take necessary steps
     to with draw all the pending cases filed by him such as -
     R.P.F.C. No. 238/2023, R.P.F.C No. 119/2025,
     W.P.No.13877/2021,                  W.P.No.13476/2021,
     W.P.No.13552/2021,           W.P.No.         29574/2024,
     W.P.No.16703/2022. Pending before the Honorable High
     Court of Karnataka at Bangalore with against Cr. No.
     116/2020 of Womens Police Station Mangaluru. And
     also O.S. No. 51/2023 pending before the honorable 1st
     Family Court Mangalore.

  d) That the Respondent also agreed to take necessary
    steps to withdraw all the pending cases filed by her such
    as Crl.M.C. No. 1/2021, Crl.M.C. No.2/2022 Crl.M.C.
    No.5/2023 pending before the Hon'ble JMFC VI Court
    Mangalore and Crl. M.C. 110/2023 pending before the
    Hon'ble Principal Family Court Magnalore and also P.C.
                                  -8-
                                                 NC: 2026:KHC:8552
                                           WP No. 13877 of 2021
                                       C/W WP No. 13476 of 2021
                                           WP No. 13552 of 2021
HC-KAR



        No. 2/2021 pending before the Hon'ble II CJM Court
        Mangalore.

   e) That in view of the aforesaid agreement both the
     Petitioner and Respondent mutually agreed for divorce
     without any kind of future maintenance and that they
     have no claims whatsoever nature against each other in
     respect of maintenance, inheritance of moveable and
     immovable properties, compensation, alimony, assets
     etc.,

   f) All the allegations made against each other as been
      withdrawn.

   g) That both the parties have agreed to bear the expenses
      arise whatsoever individually.

   h) That both the Petitioner and Respondent agreed for the
      separation and dissolve the Marriage solemnized on
      18.05.20211 at Shri. Mangaladevi Temple, Mangalore
      and the marriage was registered under the provision of
      the Hindu Marriage Act and also the dissolution of
      Marriage Certificate dated 02.06.2010 bearing No. MGT-
      HM93-2010-11 in the office of the Hindu Marriage
      Registrar, Mangaluru.

   5.    That the Petitioner and the Respondent herein
        voluntarily and out of their own free will and the own
        accord without any coercion or undue influence have
        mutually agreed for mutual separation and dissolve the
        marriage and consented to the above terms and
        conditions.

              In view of the aforesaid agreement entered into
        between the parties, the parties pray that the Hon'ble
        Family Court may be pleased to pass necessary orders.

               Parties will appear before the Hon'ble Court on
        next hearing date for passing necessary Orders/decree
        in terms of the above said agreement."



        3.    Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

pursuant to the agreement entered into between the parties, all
                                        -9-
                                                       NC: 2026:KHC:8552
                                                 WP No. 13877 of 2021
                                             C/W WP No. 13476 of 2021
                                                 WP No. 13552 of 2021
HC-KAR



the proceedings between the parties are settled and the

present petitions are to be allowed to quash the criminal

proceedings in the interest of justice.


      4.      Learned counsel for respondent No.2 admits the

contentions taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners. He

also admits that memorandum of agreement referred to above

and submits no objections to allow these petitions.


      5.      The memo along with memorandum of agreement

and the submissions are placed on record. In view of the

settlement        arrived    at   between     the   parties,   I   deem    it

appropriate to allow the petition by quashing the criminal

proceedings initiated against the petitioners. Accordingly, I

proceed to pass the following:


                                   ORDER

(i) The writ petitions are allowed.

(ii) The criminal proceedings initiated in Crime

No.116/2020 of Mangalore East Police Station,

registered for the offences punishable under

Section 498A, 497, 494, 307, 506, 120 R/w

- 10 -

NC: 2026:KHC:8552

HC-KAR

Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry

Prohibition Act, are hereby quashed against the

petitioners in all the writ petitions.

In view of the disposal of the main petition, pending

IA No.1/2024 stands disposed off in WP.No.13877/2021.

Sd/-

(M G UMA) JUDGE

BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter