Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8003 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:11270-DB
MFA No. 103877 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
M.F.A. NO. 103877 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
RYATARA SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT,
RANNANAGAR, AT: TIMMAPUR-587122,
TQ. MUDHOL, DISTRICT: BAGALKOT.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ P. MUDHOL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M/S. TECHMATES MARKETING SERVICES,
SUITE NO.9, GROUND FLOOR,
SHAHEEN RESIDENCY APARTMENT,
BOYCE COMPOUND, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI.
(REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM).
2. REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP
Digitally signed by ACT, 1932, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER,
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN KATTIMANI SHRI ANAND G. HANJI,
Location: High Court
of Karnataka, PLOT NO.381, BUDA SECTOR 40,
Dharwad Bench
KUVEMPU NAGAR, BELAGAVI, PIN-590001.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
13 (1) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURT ACT, 2015, PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT O.S.NO.5005/2022 DATED 20.09.2022 PASSED BY
THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, BAGALKOT TO
SIT AT: JAMKHANDI AND PRESIDING OFFICER, DESIGNATED
COMMERCIAL COURT, AT: JAMKHANDI BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT
WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:11270-DB
MFA No. 103877 of 2025
HC-KAR
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL)
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of the Court
to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a commercial appeal.
2. The said submission is placed on record.
3. The appeal is disposed of with liberty to file
appropriate appeal as per law.
4. The Registry is directed to return the certified copies
after retaining Xerox copies.
5. It is needless to observe that the appellant would be
entitled to benefit of limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation
Act, 1963.
Sd/-
(S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE
Sd/-
(VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE ABK /CT-AN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!