Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10782 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 November, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:16558
RSA No. 6104 of 2010
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.6104 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
MAHADEVI
W/O. RAMU HANCHINAL
ALSO KNOWN AS
MAHADEVI D/O. BASAPPA DIDDIMANI,
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. NEAR KEB,
BASAVAN - BAGEWADI,
DIST. BIJAPUR-587208.
...APPELLANT
(SMT. MAHADEVI W/O. RAMU HANCHINAL-APPELLANT-ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally
signed by
YASHAVANT
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR 1. SHAKUNTALA
NARAYANKAR Date:
2025.11.28
10:40:03
W/O. RAMU @ RAMAPPA HANCHINAL,
+0530
AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. APMC QUARTERS,
MAHALINGAPUR,
TQ. MUDHOL,
DIST. BAGALKOTE-587201.
2. SMT. SANGAWWA
W/O. BASAPPA HANCHINAL,
SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS.
2A. SMT. BALAWWA
W/O. ANNARAI BEELUR,
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:16558
RSA No. 6104 of 2010
HC-KAR
AGE: 68 YEARS, R/O. ATHALATTI,
DIST. VIJAYPUR-587208.
2B. SMT. LAYAWWA
W/O. SHARANAPPA NAIKODI,
AGE: 53 YEARS,
R/O. LACHYAN, TQ. INDI,
DIST. VIJAYPUR-586211.
2C. LAKSHMAN
S/O. BASAPPA HANCHINAL,
AGE: 51 YEARS,
R/O. ATHALATTI,
DIST. VIJAYPUR-587208.
2D. SM. KASTURI
W/O. BASAPPA HANCHINAL,
AGE: MAJOR,
R/O. ATHALATTI,
DIST. VIJAYPUR-587208.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.G. YATNAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (A TO D))
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 R/W. ORDER 41
RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 27.08.2010 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE JAMKHANDI SITTING AT MUDHOL IN
R.A.NO.144/2004 ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.07.2004 PASSED BY
THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) COURT MUDHOL IN
O.S.NO.285/2002, THE PRESENT APPEAL IS PREFERRED.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:16558
RSA No. 6104 of 2010
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI )
It is observed by this Court that the matter is of the year
2010 and despite showing the name of the appellant in the cause
list, the appellant has not appeared. It appears that the appellant
is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/-
(C M JOSHI) JUDGE
YAN CT:PA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!