Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr.Chennerayappa vs Income Tax Officer
2025 Latest Caselaw 10595 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10595 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Mr.Chennerayappa vs Income Tax Officer on 24 November, 2025

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar
Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar
                                              -1-
                                                           NC: 2025:KHC:48602
                                                         WP No. 24323 of 2021


                   HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                            WRIT PETITION NO. 24323 OF 2021 (T-IT)
                   BETWEEN:

                         MR. CHANNERAYAPPA
                         S/O RAMAPPA
                         AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
                         RESIDING AT NO.62,
                         KAMASANDRA, DEVANAHALLI
                         BANGALORE RURAL
                         BANGALORE - 562 135.
                                                                 ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. MOHAMMED MUJASSIM, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    INCOME TAX OFFICER
Digitally signed         WARD 6(3)(1), BANGALORE
by
SHARADAVANI              BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD,
B
Location: High           6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMS VILLAGE
Court of                 KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095.
Karnataka


                   2.    PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6
                         BANGALORE, BMTC BUILDING,
                         80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK
                         NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE,
                         KORAMANGALA
                         BENGALURU - 560 095.

                   3.    CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
                                     -2-
                                                   NC: 2025:KHC:48602
                                               WP No. 24323 of 2021


HC-KAR




      DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
      MINISTRY OF FINANCE
      UNION OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK
      NEW DELHI - 110 002,
      REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS CHAIRPERSON
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. Y.V. RAVI RAJ, ADVOCATE FOR
    SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)

       THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 25.06.2021 ISSUED U/S 148 OF
THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 BY THE R1 WHEREBY THE R1 IS
SEEKING TO INITIATE RE-ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS U/S
147 OF THE ACT, 1961 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17
AND      ALLOW     THE    SAID      RELIEF    AD    RENDER        JUSTICE
ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR


                             ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner seeks following reliefs:

(a) Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ / order / direction quashing the impugned notice dated 25.06.2021 bearing No.ITBA/AST/S/148/2021-22/1033697989(1) issued under Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act,

NC: 2025:KHC:48602

HC-KAR

1961 by the 1st respondent whereby the 1st respondent is seeking to initiate re-assessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2016-17 and allow the said relief and render justice (Annexure-A);

(b) Declaring that in the event it is being held that the impugned notifications dated 31.03.2021 and 27.04.2021 bearing No.20/2021/F.No.370142/35/2020-TPL and No.38/2021/F.No.370142/35/2020-TPL respectively (Annexures D and D1) issued by the 3rd respondent enable the respondents and the revenue authorities to dispense with the requirement to comply with the conditions precedent that are set out in Section 148A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 before issuing any notice under Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, the said Notifications are contrary to the provisions of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 and the provision of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 and thus bad in law.

(c) Declaring that the impugned proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent under the Income-Tax Act, 1961, are illegal and without the authority of law;

NC: 2025:KHC:48602

HC-KAR

(d) Grant such other or further relief/s as this Hon'ble court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and

learned counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the

records.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that

having regard to the fact that the impugned notice at Annexure-A

issued by the respondent under Section 148 of the Income Tax

Act, 1961 dated 25.06.2021 is covered by the judgment of the

Hon'ble Apex Court in 'UNION OF INDIA VS. ASHISH

AGARWAL', (2022) 138 TAXMANN.COM 64 (SC, nothing further

survives in the present petition, which deserves to be disposed of

in terms of the judgment in ASHISH AGARWAL supra.

4. Submission is placed on record.

5. In ASHISH AGARWAL supra, the Hon'ble Apex court

issued following directions that all over India in relation to all

notices purported to have been issued under Section 148 of the

Income Tax Act, 1961 prior to amendment, which came into force

NC: 2025:KHC:48602

HC-KAR

on 01.04.2021 by treating the said notices as having been issued

under Section 148 (a)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and in

the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in

ASHISH AGARWAL supra, nothing further survives in the present

petition and the same is disposed of as having become infructuous

reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to take recourse to such

remedy as available in law including approaching this court

subsequently, if occasion so arises.

Sd/-

(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

SS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter