Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri A N Narasimha Murthy vs Smt N Ramya
2025 Latest Caselaw 5513 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5513 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri A N Narasimha Murthy vs Smt N Ramya on 25 March, 2025

                                         -1-
                                                       NC: 2025:KHC:12612
                                                     MFA No. 5352 of 2017




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                   DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                      BEFORE
             THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
             MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5352 OF 2017 (MV-I)
            BETWEEN:

                 SRI A.N.NARASIMHA MURTHY
                 S/O NARASIMHAPPA
                 AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
                 R/A UPPARAHALLI VILLAGE
                 HALE HALLI POST
                 MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI
                 GOWRIBIDANUR TLAUK
                 CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT
                                                              ...APPELLANT
            (BY SMT. SUGUNA R REDDY, ADVOCATE)
            AND:
            1.   SMT.N.RAMYA
                 W/O MADHUSUDHAN
Digitally        MAJOR IN AGE
signed by        R/A NO.10, 6TH CROSS
SUVARNA T        GURUDHARSHAN LAYOUT
Location:        VIDHYARANYA PURA
HIGH             BANGALORE-97
COURT OF    2.   THE BRANCH MANAGER
KARNATAKA        BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
                 BRANCH OFFICE
                 GROUND FLOOR, NO.311
                 T.B.R. TOWER, 1ST CROSS
                 NEW MISSION ROAD
                 NEAR BANGALORE STOCK EXCHANGE
                 BANGALORE-560 027
                                                           ...RESPONDENTS
            (BY SRI.B.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R2
                R1- SERVICE OF NOTICE IS DISPENSED           WITH   V.C.O.
                     DT: 30.06.2023)
                                 -2-
                                                NC: 2025:KHC:12612
                                            MFA No. 5352 of 2017




     THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:26.03.2015 PASSED IN MVC
NO.117/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE
JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH.15), PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:     HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI


                        ORAL JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by the judgment and award passed in

M.V.C.No.117/2012 dated 26.03.2015 by the XIII Addl. Small

Cause Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru,

the claimant is before this court.

2. It is stated that the accident had occurred on

10.12.2011 at about 4:30 p.m., the claimant had sustained

injuries and as per the wound certificate the claimant had

suffered fracture shaft of humerous left side, injuries over the

right side of face, injuries on the in flaw orbital area, injuries on

the chin, injuries over the lower lip, injury on the left leg at two

different places, injuries over right maxillary area, loss of 5

teeth and loosening of several teeth from sockets, fracture of

several teeth, fracture of upper anterior segment of maxillary,

NC: 2025:KHC:12612

crush injuries on the left hand. As per the orthopedic doctor,

disability to the limb is 35.4% and to the whole body it is 12%.

As per the dentist the disability is 12% for oro facial region.

According to the claimant, she is earning an amount of

Rs.450/- per day and the court had taken Rs.7500/- per month

and the disability was considered at 10% and granted the

compensation of an amount of Rs.3,24,000/- as per the table

given below:

                       Heads                      Compensation
                                                    Awarded
      1.   Pain and suffering               :   Rs.       40,000/-
      2.   Loss of income during the laid   :   Rs.       25,000/-
           up period, diet, nourishment
           and etc
           Attendant charges,
      3.   conveyance and other             :   Rs.       25,000/-
           incidental charges and etc
      4.   Medical Expenditure              :   Rs.         10,000/-
      5.   Loss of future income            :   Rs.      1,44,000/-
      6.   Loss of amenities and comfort    :   Rs.         40,000/-
           Permanent physical               :
      7.                                        Rs.        40,000/-
           impairment
           TOTAL                            :   Rs.      3,24,000/-


3. The Learned counsel appearing for the claimant

submits that the claimant had sustained several fractures.

Under the head of pain and suffering, the tribunal had granted

only an amount of Rs.40,000/- which is on the lower side.

Further, it is stated that the loss of income during the laid up

NC: 2025:KHC:12612

period was also not reasonably granted. Towards loss of future

earning even as per the doctor the disability is 12%, the court

ought to have taken 12% as the disability to the whole body.

Towards the loss of amenities and permanent physical

impairment also the amount needs to be enhanced. Towards

future medical expenses no amount is granted. It is submitted

that the compensation that is awarded is not just and

reasonable.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/

Insurance Company submits that the trial court had granted

the reasonable compensation and had rightly considered all the

aspects and in fact the compensation that is awarded is on the

higher side and no interference is called for.

5. Having heard the counsels on either side, perused the

entire material on record. Considering the multiple fractures,

this court is granting an amount of Rs.70,000/- under the

head of pain and suffering. Towards loss of income during

laid up period for five months, this court is granting an

amount of Rs.30,000/-. Towards attendant, nourishment,

conveyance, medical expenses and loss of amenities,

NC: 2025:KHC:12612

permanent physical impairment the Tribunal had rightly

granted the compensation and this court is not interfering with

the same. Coming to the loss of future income, considering the

injuries and as per the evidence of the doctor, the trial Court

should have taken 12% as a disability and this court is taking

the income at Rs.7,500/-, under the head of loss of future

income this court is granting an amount of Rs.1,72,800/-

(Rs.7,500 x 12 x 16 x 12/100 = Rs.1,72,800/-). Then coming

to the future medical expenses, both doctors i.e., the

Orthopedic as well as a Dental Doctor has stated about the

future medical expenses. Hence, this court is granting an

amount of Rs.40,000/- under the head of future medical

expenses.

6. In the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of V. MEKALA Vs. M. MALATHI

AND ANOTHER, the claimant is entitled for an amount of

Rs.10,000/- towards Legal Expenses.

8. The claimant is therefore, entitled to the compensation

under the following heads:

NC: 2025:KHC:12612

Heads Compensation Compensation Awarded by Awarded by Tribunal this Court

1. Pain and suffering : Rs. 40,000/- 70,000/-

2. Loss of income : Rs. 25,000/- 30,000/-

during the laid up period, diet, nourishment and etc Attendant charges, conveyance and

3. : Rs. 25,000/- 25,000/-

other incidental charges and etc

4. Medical Expenditure : Rs. 10,000/- 10,000/-

     Loss of future           :
5.                                Rs.   1,44,000/-         1,72,800/-
     income
     Loss of amenities
6.                            : Rs.          40,000/-       40,000/-
     and comfort
     Permanent physical       :
7.                                Rs.        40,000/-        40,000/-
     impairment
     Future Medical           :
8.                                Rs.            00/-        40,000/-
     expenses
9.   Legal Expenses           : Rs.              00/-        10,000/-
     TOTAL                    : Rs.     3,24,000/-        4,37,800/-


i) Accordingly, the appeal filed by the claimant is

partly allowed by enhancing the compensation

from an amount of Rs.3,24,000/- to

Rs.4,37,800/-.

ii) The enhanced amount shall carry interest @ 6%

per annum from the date of petition, till the date

of realization.

NC: 2025:KHC:12612

iii) This court by order dated 22.03.2025 had

condoned the delay of 742 days and the

claimant is not entitled for interest during the

delay of 742 days.

iv) Respondent-Insurance Company shall deposit

the compensation amount with accrued interest

before the tribunal within a period of 8 (Eight)

weeks. On such deposit, the claimant is entitled

to withdraw the entire amount without

furnishing any security.

v) The registry is directed to return the Trial Court

Record to the Tribunal along with the certified

copy of the order passed by this court forthwith

without any delay.

vi) No Costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/-

(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

TS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter