Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ugraiah vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 5294 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5294 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Ugraiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 March, 2025

Author: Suraj Govindaraj
Bench: Suraj Govindaraj
                                                -1-
                                                             NC: 2025:KHC:11747
                                                            WP No. 3644 of 2025




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                              BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
                          WRIT PETITION NO. 3644 OF 2025 (CS-EL/M)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    UGRAIAH,
                         S/O DODDANARASIMHAIAH,
                         AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
                         R/O DODDABALAPURA TALUK,
                         KASAGATTA, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK,
                         BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
                   2.    PRASANNA KUMAR,
                         S/O MUNIYAPPA,
                         AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
                         R/O 68, MADHURE
                         DODDABALAPURA TALUK,
                         BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
                                                                      PETITIONERS
                   (BY SRI. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY.,ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
Digitally signed         DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION,
by SHWETHA
RAGHAVENDRA              M.S.BUILDING,
Location: HIGH           DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
COURT OF                 BENGALURU - 560001,
KARNATAKA                REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
                   2.    THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY,
                         3RD FLOOR, T.T.M.C. A BLOCK,
                         SHANTHI NAGAR,
                         BANGALORE - 560027,
                         REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

                   3.    DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES /
                         DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER,
                         DC OFFICE PREMISES,
                         BEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
                               -2-
                                           NC: 2025:KHC:11747
                                         WP No. 3644 of 2025




     DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
     BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

4.   RETURNING OFFICER,
     TALUK PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND
     RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.,
     DODDABALLAPURA,
     BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561203
5.   TALUK PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND
     RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.,
     DODDABALLAPURA,
     BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561203,
     REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     (RESPONDENT NOS.4 AND 5 ARE REGISTERED UNDER
     THE KARNATAKA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1959)
                                                   RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. YOGESH D NAIK., AGA FOR R1, R3 AND R4;
    SRI. TL KIRAN KUMAR., FOR R2;
     V/O DTD 21.02.2025 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R5 IS H/S;
      R5 - TALUK PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER ARUN KUMAR YH., FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON
IA.1/2025)

      THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R2 TO R5 TO
INCLUDE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE ELIGIBLE VOTERS
LIST AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO CONTEST AND CAST THEIR
VOTES IN THE ELECTIONS TO THE R5 WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO BE
HELD ON 16/02/2025 AS PER THE CALENDAR OF EVENTS PRODUCED
AT AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC,.

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:       HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
                                       -3-
                                             NC: 2025:KHC:11747
                                            WP No. 3644 of 2025




                             ORAL ORDER

1. This Court by way of various interim orders had

permitted the petitioners who were declared to be

ineligible voters to cast their vote in the elections of

the Society, subject to the result of the writ petition

and that the votes cast by the petitioners shall be

kept in separate ballot boxes.

2. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of

H.S.Raju vs. State of Karnataka & others1 has

after considering the matter in detail come to a

categorical conclusion that any irregularity in the

conduct of election a petition under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India would not be the proper remedy

any dispute as regards the eligibility or ineligibility

and the deficiencies in finalization of final electoral

list, could only be considered in a dispute raised as

regard the election under Section 70 (2) of the

Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 after the

W.P.No.8502/2022 dated 7.6.2022

NC: 2025:KHC:11747

announcement of the results by counting even the

votes cast by the petitioners.

3. The said judgment not having been challenged and

having attained finality, the fact being more or less

similar would equally apply to the present matter.

4. In that view of the matter, I pass the following:

ORDER

i) The Writ Petitions are disposed of.

ii) The Returning Officer in each of the above matters

is directed to announce the result within seven days

of the receipt of a copy of this order by taking into

account the votes cast by the petitioners in each of

the above matters.

iii) In the event of any proceeding being filed in

relation to the results of the election under Section

70 (2) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act,

1959, all the contentions raised herein and any that

may be raised are left open for consideration in

NC: 2025:KHC:11747

accordance with the applicable law, this court has

not expressed any opinion on those issues.

iv) The votes cast by the respective petitioners which

had been directed to be kept in separate box shall

continue to be retained in a separate box until the

disposal of the dispute if any raised within the time

frame prescribed.

SD/-

(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

PNV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter