Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Axis Bank Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 6603 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6603 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Axis Bank Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 June, 2025

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar
Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar
                                              -1-
                                                           NC: 2025:KHC:21998
                                                       CRL.P No. 8328 of 2025


               HC-KAR



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                   CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8328 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))


              BETWEEN:

              1.     AXIS BANK LTD
                     A BANKING COMPANY
                     CARRYING ON THE BANKING BUSINESS
                     UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949
                     INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
                     AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 'TRISHUL',
                     3RD FLOOR, OPP:SAMARTHESHWAR TEMPLE,
                     LAW GARDEN, ELLIS BRIDGE,
                     AHMEDABAD - 380 006, GUJARAT.

                     AND HAVING ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT
                     GROUND FLOOR, G.O. SQUARE
                     SURVEY NO.249(P), 240(P)
                     251(P), HINJEWADI ROAD,
                     WAKAD, PUNE, MAHARASTRA-411 057.
Digitally
signed by H
K HEMA               REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH HEAD
Location:            MR. PRASHANT KUMAR SINGH
HIGH                 AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                     ALSO AT: S NO.234, PLOT NO.79,
                     SHIVRATNA BANGLOW LANE NO.3
                     AIRPORT ROAD, SANJAY PARK,
                     LANAGOAN PUNE, POJA STATION
                     M.H.- 411 032.
                                                                 ...PETITIONER
              (BY SMT. LAKSHMI T., ADVOCATE FOR
              SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE)
                             -2-
                                          NC: 2025:KHC:21998
                                    CRL.P No. 8328 of 2025


 HC-KAR



AND:

1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
     BY WHITEFIELD CEN CRIME POLICE STATION,
     WHITEFIELD DIVISION,
     BANGALORE DISTRICT
     REPRESENTED BY SPP,
     HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
     BANGALORE - 01.

2.   SRI MALLIKARJUN PUJARI
     S/O SIDDAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
     RESIDING AT 37/2, 15TH CROSS,
     SOMESHWAR NILAYA,
     PRAGATHI LAYOUT WEST,
     MARATAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 037
     KARNATAKA.
                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI NAGESHWARAPPA K., HCGP FOR R.1;
NOTICE TO R.2 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE COURT
ORDER DATED 24.06.2025.)


     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER, DATED 12.07.2024
PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT OF THE 45TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU, IN CRIME NO.654/2024 I.E.,
ANNEXURE-C IN TERMS OF WHICH, THE PETITIONER IS
DIRECTED TO DEFREEZE THE CURRENT ACCOUNT BEARING
A/C.NO.923020013230995 MAINTAINED IN THE PETITIONER'S BANK
AND TRANSFER THE SAME TO THE ACCOUNT OF THE
RESPONDENT NO.2, ETC.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                                  -3-
                                                 NC: 2025:KHC:21998
                                            CRL.P No. 8328 of 2025


 HC-KAR




                           ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner has sought for the following

reliefs:

"a) To set-aside the Order, Dated: 12.07.2024 passed by The Hon'ble Court of the 45th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, in Crime No.654/2024 i.e., ANNEXURE 'C' in terms of which, the Petitioner is directed to defreeze the current account bearing A/c. No.923020013230995 maintained in the Petitioner's Bank and transfer the same to the account of the Respondent No.2.

b) To pass such other orders as may be deemed expedient in the circumstance of the case and in the interest of justice."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

HCGP for respondent No.1 and perused the material on record.

3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged

in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on

record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue in

NC: 2025:KHC:21998

HC-KAR

controversy involved in the present petition is directly and squarely

covered by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in

the case of Axis Bank Ltd., Vs. The State of Karnataka and Anr.

- Crl.P.No.1787/2023 dated 14.12.2023, and the present petition

may be disposed of in the above terms.

4. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the

petitioner, the issue in controversy in the present petition is covered

by the judgment of this Court in the case of Axis Bank Ltd. supra,

wherein it is held as under:

"The Petitioner which is a Financial Institution is before this Court challenging the order passed by 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on an application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. by the complainant/respondent No.2 directing the petitioner-Bank to defreeze the amount belonging to the accused and transfer the said amount to the bank account of the complainants/respondent No.2.

NC: 2025:KHC:21998

HC-KAR

2. The petitioner's concern is that the order passed by the Jurisdictional Magistrate cannot be executed because it surpasses the specified release amount, and numerous courts across the Country have issued directives to the investigating agencies to unfreeze the bank accounts of the accused therein.

3. Learned Special Public Prosecutor on instructions would suggest that the matter may be remanded to the Jurisdictional Courts to consider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, by affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

4. Admittedly, multiple cases are registered against the accused herein within the State and across the country and there are multiple orders passed by the Jurisdictional Magistrates directing the petitioner to unfreeze the account of the accused and transfer the amount to the bank account of the complainants. The passing of multiple orders has caused difficulty to the petitioner/bank in executing the said order, since the amount ordered to be released in some accounts exceeds the amount available in the subject accounts of the accused. Therefore, the learned Magistrate before passing

NC: 2025:KHC:21998

HC-KAR

an order directing the petitioner to unfreeze and transfer the amount to the accounts of the complainants, is required to hear the petitioner. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

i. Criminal Petition is allowed.

ii. The order dated 26.11.2021 passed by the 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in Cr.No.452/2021 is hereby set aside.

iii. Matter is remanded to 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru to reconsider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, after giving the opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

5. Till the application is disposed of, the petitioner/bank is restrained from releasing the money in favour of any person from the subject account."

5. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in

terms of the order passed in the case of Axis Bank Ltd. supra.

NC: 2025:KHC:21998

HC-KAR

6. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

i. The petition is hereby allowed.

ii. The order dated 12.07.2024 passed by the XLV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, in Crime No.654/2024 is hereby set aside.

iii. Matter is remanded to XLV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, to reconsider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, after giving the opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

iv. Till the application is disposed of, the petitioner / bank is restrained from releasing the money in favour of any person from the subject account.

Subject to the aforesaid observations and directions, the

petition stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE hkh.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter