Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Prakash vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 6293 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6293 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 June, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri Prakash vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 June, 2025

Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench: M.Nagaprasanna
                                             -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC:20712
                                                      WP No. 16571 of 2025


                   HC-KAR



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                         WRIT PETITION NO. 16571 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    SRI PRAKASH
                         S/O LATE BASAVARAJAIAH @ BASAVARAJU
                         AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

                   2.    SRI RUDRAPPA
                         S/O LATE BASAVARAJAIAH @ BASAVARAJU
                         AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

                   3.    SRI MURALIDHARA
                         S/O LATE BASAVARAJAIAH @ BASAVARAJU
                         AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
                         RESIDING AT SOREKUNTE VILLAGE
                         BELLAVI HOBLI, B.G.PALYA
Digitally signed         TUMAKURU - 572 128.
by NAGAVENI
Location: High                                                 ...PETITIONERS
Court of
Karnataka          (BY SRI M.B.CHANDRA CHOODA, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                         BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
                         DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND
                         COMMERCE, M.S.BUILDING
                         DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
                         BENGALURU - 560 001.
                               -2-
                                            NC: 2025:KHC:20712
                                        WP No. 16571 of 2025


HC-KAR




2.   THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
     KIADB, 1ST FLOOR, MARUTHI TOWER
     NEAR SIRA GARTE, B.H.ROAD
     TUMAKURU - 572 201.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1;
    SRI P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

     THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
GENERAL AWARD DATED 26/07/2019 PASSED IN CASE NO.
LAQ/KIADB/TU/2019-20 BY THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER, KIADB, TUMKUR VIDE ANNEXURE-G, IN SO FAR IT
RELATES TO THE LANDS BEARING SY.NO.82 MEASURING
3.13.08 OUT OF AN EXTENT OF 7 ACRES 14 GUNTAS,
SY.NO.87, MEASURING 2.7.08 OUT OF 4 ACRES 05 GUNTAS
SITUATED AT SOREKUNTE VILLAGE, BELLAVI HOBLI,
TUMAKURU TALUK, SY.NO.12, MEASURING 1 ACRE OUT OF 5
ACRES 14 GUNTAS, SY.NO.45 MEASURING 2 ACRES 14
GUNTAS, SITUATED AT PURADAKUNTE VILLAGE, BELLAVI
HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK IN ALL THE FOUR SURVEY
NUMBERS, BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA


                        ORAL ORDER

The petitioners are at the doors of this Court seeking the

following prayer:

"i) quash the General Award dated 26/07/2019 passed in Case No. LAQ/KIADB/TU/2019-20 by the Special

NC: 2025:KHC:20712

HC-KAR

Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB, Tumkur vide Annexure-G, in so far it relates to the land bearing Sy.No.82 measuring 3.13.08 out of an extent of 7 Acres 14 guntas, Sy.No.87, measuring 2.7.08 out of 4 Acres 05 guntas situated at Sorekunte village, Bellavi Hobli, Tumakuru Taluk, Sy.No.12, measuring 1 Acre out of 5 Acres 14 guntas, Sy.No.45 mearuing 2 Acres 14 guntas, situated at Puradakunte village, Bellavi Hobli, Tumakuru Taluk in all the four survey numbers, by issue of writ of certiorari.

ii) issue writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to withdraw the amount in deposit on the file of Principal Civil Judge, Tumakuru District, Tumakuru, in No.SLAO/KIADB/TU/Comp No.14636/2019-20/112 vide Annexure-K1, the cheque dated 02/06/2020 drawn on Corporation Bank by the Special LAO, KIADB in the name of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tumkur, Annexure-K2, the letter dated 02/06/2020 bearing No. SLAO/KIADB/TU/Comp/14226/2019-20 vide Annexure-L1, the cheque dated 02/06/2020 drawn on Corporation Bank, by the Special LAO, KIADB in the name of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tumkur, Annexure-L2, the letter dated 20/06/2020 bearing No.SLAO/KIADB/TU/Comp /14299/2020-21/192, vide Annexure-M1, the cheque dated 20/06/2020 drawn on Corporation Bank by the Special LAO, KIADB in the name of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tumkur, Annexure-M2, the letter dated 23/06/2020 bearing No.SLAO/KIADB/TU/Comp/24251/2020-21/295, vide Annexure-N1, the cheque dated 23/06/2020 drawn on Corporation Bank by the Special LAO, KIADB in the name of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tumkur, Annexure - N2, and disburse the same to the petitioners.

iii) issue direction to the second respondent to pass consent award in favour of of the petitioners as per the consent award, fixed by the second respondent vide Annexures-H & J respectively, in so far it relates to the lands bearing Sy.No.82 measuring 3.13.08 out of an extent of 7 Acres 14 guntas, Sy.No.87, measuring 2.7.08 out of 4 Acres 05 guntas situated at Sorekunte village, Bellavi Hobli, Tumakuru Taluk,

NC: 2025:KHC:20712

HC-KAR

sy.No.12, measuring 1 Acre out of 5 Acres 14 guntas, Sy.No.45 measuring 2 Acres 14 guntas, situated at Puradakunte village, Bellavi Hobli, Tumakuru Taluk in all the four survey numbers.

iv) issue any appropriate writ, order or direction as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case."

2. Heard Sri M.B.Chandra Chooda, learned counsel for

petitioners, Sri Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court

Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and

Sri P.V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

3. Learned counsel appearing to the petitioners submits

in plethora of identical matters, this Court has considered the

issue and answered in favour of the petitioners. One such

order passed by the coordinate bench of this Court in

W.P.No.33825/2024, disposed on 13.12.2024, has allowed the

petition and directed the respondents to consider the case of

the petitioners therein and pass necessary order in accordance

with law.

4. Learned High Court Government Pleader would not

dispute the position of law; the identical circumstance and

NC: 2025:KHC:20712

HC-KAR

afore-quoted judgment rendered by the coordinate bench of

this Court.

5. This Court in W.P.No.33825/2024, disposed on

13.12.2024, has held as follows:

"2. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners is that the lands belonging to the petitioners has been acquired by the respondent-authorities for the purpose of formation of Industrial Layout and the General Award Annexure-C dated 26.07.2019 is passed by the respondent-authorities. It is stated in the writ petition that insofar as the petitioners lands in question are concerned, petitioners are willing for consent award that may be passed by the respondent-authorities.

3. In that view of the matter, this Court in several writ petitions has considered similar cases and therefore, I pass the following order :-

a. Writ petition is allowed;

b. Certiorari is issued, the General Award bearing No.LAQ/KIADB/TU/2019-20 dated 26.07.2019 passed by 2nd respondent at Annexure - C insofar as the property of the petitioners are concerned is hereby quashed;

c. Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of the petitioners in terms of Section 29(2) of the KIAD Act upon the petitioners satisfying all the requirements thereof;

d. In the event of there being any claims adverse as regards the petitioner in respect of the said lands prior to the disbursal of the amount, the General Award will come back automatically into force.

e. Respondent No.2 is permitted to withdraw the amount in deposit and disburse to the petitioner.

NC: 2025:KHC:20712

HC-KAR

Therefore, the issues as answered by the co-ordinate

bench of this Court supra and in the light of the issues standing

covered on all its fours, the writ petition stands disposed on the

very same findings and the observations.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

NVJ

CT:SS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter