Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 725 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
CRL.P No. 102566 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.102566 OF 2025
(482 OF Cr.PC/528 OF BNSS)
BETWEEN:
1. BILALKHAN S/O. RIYAZAHMED JAGIRDAR,
AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: REAL ESTATE,
R/AT: OLD HUBBALLI, KILA ROAD,
NEAR KANNAD GOVERNMENT SCHOOL,
TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580028.
2. MAHAMMASADIQ
S/O/ ABDULSAMAD SHOLAPUR.
AGE: 20 YEARS. OCC: MOBILE TECHNICIAN,
R/AT: GAVI ONI, OPPOSITE HAZRAT
MALANG SHAH WALI SHAADI MAHAL,
Digitally signed
by RAKESH S TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580025.
HARIHAR
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench
3. SAYYAD SADDAM S/O. SAYYAD AHMED,
AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: REAL ESTATE,
R/AT: SRINAGAR, HOUSE NO.44,
NEAR AMAN HALL, OLD HUBBALLI,
TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580028.
4. IMTIYAZ AHMED
S/O. MUSTAK AHMED MANIYAR,
AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: REAL ESTATE,
R/AT: ASAR ONI,
NEAR GOVERNMENT URDU SCHOOL,
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
CRL.P No. 102566 of 2025
HC-KAR
OLD HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBBALLI,
DIST. DHARWAD-580028.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. GOURISHANKAR MOT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
VIDYANAGAR POLICE STATION, HUBBALLI,
REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, AT: DHARWAD-580011.
2. SHRI IMRAN S/O. IMTIYAZ MANIYAR,
AGE: 32 YRS, OCC: LABOURER,
R/AT: DIVATAGI ONI, NEAR FISH MARKET,
OLD HUBBALLI, NOW R/AT: SAINAGAR,
UNKAL, TQ. HUBBALLI,
DIST. DHARWAD-580021.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, ADV. FOR R1;
SRI HIRANKUMAR PATEL, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C.
(528 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.1 TO
4/PETITIONERS AS IN VIDYANAGAR POLICE STATION IN
CRIME NO.0083/2025 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE
U/S.189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(2), 126(2), 54, 109, 352,
351(2), 190 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA-2023, PENDING
ON THE FILE OF COURT OF 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC, AT HUBBALLI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
CRL.P No. 102566 of 2025
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
Heard Shri Gouri Shankar Mot., learned counsel for
the petitioners, Shri Abhishek Malipatil., learned High Court
Government Pleader for respondent No.1 - State and
Sri. Hirankumar Patel., learned counsels for respondent
No.2.
2. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 have filed
the present petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS, 2023')
seeking to quash the entire proceedings in Crime
No.83/2025 of Vidyanagar Police Station, pending on the
file of the learned I-Additional Civil Judge and JMFC at
Hubballi, for the offences punishable under Sections
189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(2), 126(2), 54, 109, 352,
351(2) and 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
HC-KAR
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case is as under:
The de facto complainant-respondent No.2 lodged
the complaint against petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 4,
alleging that on 15.06.2025 at about 2:00 p.m, on a public
road, near Unkal lKoogu Basappa's Katte, these petitioners
and others picked up quarrel with the de facto
complainant, abused him in filthy language and assaulted
with soda bottle on his forehead, head, face, etc., thereby
causing severe injuries. Thereafter, the injured was shifted
to the hospital, where, he lodged complaint. Based on the
complaint, police have registered a case in Crime
No.83/2025 for the aforesaid offences.
4. During the course of investigation, the
petitioners were arrested and in turn, remanded to judicial
custody. Taking exception to the same, these
petitioners/accused No.1 to 4 filed this petition to quash
the entire proceedings.
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
HC-KAR
5. Now, the de facto-complainant and the
petitioners have resolved the issues held between them.
In view of settlement, the petitioners and de facto
complainant-respondent No.2 have filed a joint application
under Section 359 (6) and (8) of BNSS, 2023. The
contents of joint application read as under:
"Herein the advocate for the accused No.1 to 4/petitioners and the respondent No.2 submits before this Hon'ble Court as follows;
1) That, in view of the intervention of elders the accused No.1 & 2 /petitioners, respondent No: 2 have mutually agreed to the following terms and conditions mentioned below;
2) That, the respondent no: 2/ complainant had lodged the complaint against the accused No.1 to 4/ petitioners in Vidyanagar Police Station in Crime No: 0083/2025 for the offence punishable 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(2), 126(2), 54, 109, 352, 351(2), 190 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 pending on the file of Hon'ble court of 1st Additional Civil Judge & JMFC., At: Hubballi in Vidyanagar Ps Crime No.83/2025 the dispute as aroused between the petitioners, respondent no: 2 have compromised the matter amicably. Hence in view of the same the petitioners have filed this petition quashing of entire proceeding.
3) The petitioners, respondent no: 2 at the intervention of the well-wishers and the elderly members of both the side family
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
HC-KAR
members decided to put an end to the dispute between them and accordingly arrived at a settlement of dispute and same is without their being any undue influence, coercion or threat from anybody out of their free will & wish, respondent no: 2 agreed to not to prosecute any other criminal cases nor the above case as same is in personal in nature, accordingly to facilitate compounding of the said offences alleged by the respondent no: 2 against the petitioners herein the above mentioned petition is filed.
4) That the respondent No.2 had received sum of Rs.20,000/- today & also has agreed to close the proceedings as mentioned against the petitioners & also agreed to give up all their claims in respect of said cases as the dispute is in respect of personal in nature the alleged Injury. Hence it is just and necessary to permit the petitioners, respondent no: 2 to compound the said case instead of subjecting the petitioners to face the trial.
5) In view of the above settlement between petitioners, respondent no: 2. The respondent no: 2/ injured is filing the affidavit along with this Joint memo of compromise.
THEREFORE, the petitioners / accused no: 1 to 4, respondent No.2/ complainant / injured humbly prays that, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and grant permission to compound the said offences and consequently QUASH the further proceeding against the Accused No.1 to 4 / petitioners as in Vidyanagar Police Station in Crime No: 0083/2025 for the offence punishable 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(2), 126(2), 54, 109, 352, 351(2), 190 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - 2023
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
HC-KAR
pending on the file of Hon'ble court of 1st Additional Civil Judge & JMFC., At: Hubballi in Vidyanagar Ps Crime No.83/2025 and may please to Acquit the said accused no: 1 to 4 / petitioners, in the ends of justice."
6. In view of compromise, the petitioners have
paid a sum of Rs.20,000/- as compensation to the de facto
complainant/respondent No.2 and he has acknowledged
the receipt of aforesaid amount. In support of the joint
application, the de facto complainant-respondent No.2 has
filed an affidavit. The contents of affidavit reads as under;
"AFFIDAVIT
Shri. Imran S/o Imtiyaz Manivar, Age: 32 Yrs, Occ; Labourer, R/At: Divatagi Oni, Near Fish Market, Old Hubballi, Now R/At: Sainagar, Unkal,Tq: Hubballi, Dist: Dharwad - 580
021.Today at Dharwad. I do hereby state on oath as under;
1) I state that, I am the complainant / respondent no: 2 in the above said case.
2) I state that, in view of the intervention of elders the I & petitioners have mutually agreed to the following terms and conditions mentioned below.
3) I state that, I had lodged the complaint against petitioners /accused no. 1 to 4 before the Vidyanagar Police Station in Crime No: 0083/2025 for the offence punishable offence punishable 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(2), 126(2), 54, 109, 352, 351(2), 190 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
HC-KAR
Sanhita, 2023 pending on the file of Hon'ble court of 1st Additional Civil Judge & JMFC., At: Hubballi in Vidyanagar Ps Crime No. 83/2025 the dispute as aroused between the accused no. 1 104 / petitioners & have compromised the matter amicably. Hence in view of the same the petitioners have filed this petition quashing of entire proceedings.
4) I further state that, I have agreed to close the proceedings as mentioned against the petitioners, I have also agreed to Give up all my claims in respect of said cases as arouse in the dispute. Further it is submitted that since the dispute between the petitioners and me has been settled amicably and I have agreed not to prosecute / contest the above-mentioned case against the petitioners / accused no. 1 to 4.
Hence, it is just and necessary to permit the petitioners and I to compound the said case instead of subjecting the petitioners to face the trial.
THEREFORE, I humbly pray before this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition as prayed by the petitioners / accused no. 1 to 4 in terms of joint application, in the ends of justice."
7. The petitioners have contended that the injuries
sustained by the complainant and injured persons are
minor in nature, and the offences arises out of a personal
and private dispute, with no element of public interest or
serious criminality involved.
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
HC-KAR
8. In view of the above facts and considering the
judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Narinder
Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another1
(Narider Singh), where it was held that the criminal
proceedings involving personal disputes and minor injuries
can be quashed upon genuine compromise to secure the
ends of justice. The Apex Court observed that the Courts
have power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C (528 of BNSS) to
quash criminal proceedings even in non-compoundable
offences if the parties have settled the matter amicably,
especially where the dispute is private and personal in
nature. Therefore, considering the principles laid down in
Narinder Singh's case, this Court is of the view that
continuation of trial would not serve useful purpose and
this case is fit for quashing the proceedings. Accordingly,
the following:
ORDER
i. The criminal petition is allowed.
2014 (6) SCC 466
- 10 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8448
HC-KAR
ii. The entire proceedings in Crime No. 83/2023 of Vidyanagar Police Station, pending on the file of learned 1st Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Hubballi, for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(2), 126(2), 54, 109, 352, 351(2) and 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, are hereby quashed.
iii. Since, the petitioners are in judicial custody, the concerned police authorities are directed to release accused Nos.1 to 4, if they are not required in any other criminal proceedings.
iv. Pending IA's, if any, stands disposed off.
Sd/-
(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE AM/-
CT-AN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!