Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 659 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8307-DB
RFA No. 100324 of 2022
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100324 OF 2022 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SATISH LAXMAN KALE
AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE,
R/O. NO.724,
S.V.ROAD, TILAKWADI,
BELAGAVI-590006.
REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER
SHRI PARASHARAM BALARAM BELGAONKAR,
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
YASHAVANT R/O. 566, ANVEKAR CHAWL,
NARAYANKAR
Digitally signed by
TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI.
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR
Location: HIGH COURT OF
KARNATAKA DHARWAD
BENCH DHARWAD
...APPELLANT
Date: 2025.07.04 14:19:00
+0530
(BY SRI. AKSHAY KATTI AND
SRI. ANAND ASHTEKAR, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. SRI. SADASHIV LAXMAN KALE
AGE: 77 YEARS,
OCC.RETIRED,
R/O. SASANE NAGAR,
BEHIND ITI COLLEGE,
KOLHAPUR-416001.
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8307-DB
RFA No. 100324 of 2022
HC-KAR
2. SRI. SUHAS LAXMAN KALE
AGE: 69 YEARS,
OCC. RETIRED,
R/O. SUWARNAREKHA SOCIETY,
SINHAGAD ROAD,
PUNE-411024.
3. SRI. SULBHA SURESH KHASINIS
AGE: 66 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. G3, KRISTAL OLIVINE,
AT POST: BELLANDUR,
BENGALURU-560103.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. TEJPAL A. KAMALA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH
ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., 1908, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE
APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
26.02.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.57/2018 BY THE IV
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
FIRST CLASS, BELAGAVI, AND DISMISS THE SAID SUIT, IN
THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8307-DB
RFA No. 100324 of 2022
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ)
Learned counsel for the appellant was intimated
about the death of respondent No.1 on 12.03.2025.
However, steps are not taken till date. Hence, the appeal
against respondent No.1 is abated. Consequently, the
entire appeal abates and accordingly, it is disposed of as
having abated.
SD/-
(R.NATARAJ) JUDGE
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
PJ/Ct:pa
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!