Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Geetha vs Sri Siddarameshwara
2025 Latest Caselaw 651 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 651 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Smt Geetha vs Sri Siddarameshwara on 3 July, 2025

                                         -1-
                                                     NC: 2025:KHC:23981
                                                 MFA No. 6759 of 2018
                                          C/W MFA.CROB No. 31 of 2019

             HC-KAR




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                       DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025

                                       BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
            MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6759 OF 2018 (MV-D)
                                  C/W
                MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 31 OF 2019 (MV-D)

            IN MFA No. 6759/2018

            BETWEEN:

            M/S UNIVERSAL SOMPO
            GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
            OFFICE AT UNIT NO.401, 4TH FLOOR
            SANGAM COMPLEX, 127, ANDHERI,
            KURLA ROAD,
            ANDHERI (EAST) MUMBAI
            BRANCH OFFICE AT MYSURU
            NO.363, 1ST FLOOR, GURUKAR
            DEVANNA STREET,
            FORT MOHALLA, MYSURU
            NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER,
Digitally   M/S UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL
signed by   INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
NIRMALA     PLOT NO:EL94, T.T.C INDUSTRIAL AREA,
DEVI        MIDC, MAHAPE
Location:   NAVI MUMBAI-4700701
HIGH                                                        ...APPELLANT
COURT OF    (BY SRI. ASHOKA H, ADVOCATE FOR
KARNATAKA       SRI. B C SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE)

            AND:

            1.   SMT GEETHA
                 W/O LATE RAMESHA
                 AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

            2.   POOJA R
                 S/O LATE RAMESHA
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2025:KHC:23981
                                      MFA No. 6759 of 2018
                               C/W MFA.CROB No. 31 of 2019

 HC-KAR



     AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS

3.   ABHISHEK R
     S/O LATE RAMESHA
     AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS

     ALL ARE R/AT NO.340,
     BANDIPALYA GRAMA
     ASRAMA POST, KASABA HOBLI,
     MYSURU.

4.   SIDDARAMESHWARA
     S/O B JOGAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
     R/AT NO.55, 3RD MAIN,
     KAMAKSHI HOSPITAL ROAD,
     KUVEMPUNAGARA,
     MYSURU-570023

5.   MANJESHKUMAR
     S/O LATE SHIVANNA
     AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
     R/AT NO.144, HUDCO HOUSE,
     SEWAGE FARM ROAD,
     VIDYARANYAPURAM
     MYSURU-570008
                                             ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHIVANAND, ADVOCATE FOR
 SRI. P NATARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3
 NOTICE TO R4 & R5 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DTD 29.06.2025)

      THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17/04/2018, PASSED IN MVC
NO.1027/2014, ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, COURT OF
SMALL CAUSES, MACT, MYSURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF
RS.16,22,000/- ALONG WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 7% P.A.,
FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS REALISATION AND ETC.

IN MFA.CROB NO. 31/2019

BETWEEN:

1.   SMT GEETHA
     AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
     W/O LATE RAMESHA
                             -3-
                                          NC: 2025:KHC:23981
                                       MFA No. 6759 of 2018
                                C/W MFA.CROB No. 31 of 2019

 HC-KAR




2.   POOJA R
     AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
     D/O LATE RAMESHA

3.   ABHISHEK .R
     AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
     S/O LATE RAMESHA

     CROSS OBJECTORS NO.1 TO 3 ARE
     R/AT NO.340, BANDIPALYA GRAMA,
     ASRAMA POST, KASABA HOBLI,
     MYSURU 570 009.
                                        ...CROSS OBJECTORS
(BY SRI. SHIVANAND, ADVOCATE FOR
    SRI. P NATARAJU, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   SRI SIDDARAMESHWARA
     AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
     S/O B. JOGAPPA
     R/AT NO.55, 3RD MAIN,
     KAMAKSHI HOSPITAL ROAD,
     KUVEMPU NAGAR,
     MYSURU 570023.

2.   SRI. MANJESHKUMAR
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
     S/O LATE SHIVANNA
     R/AT NO.144, HUDCO HOUSE
     SEWAGE FARM ROAD,
     VIDYARANYAPURAM,
     MYSURU 570 019.

3.    THE MANAGER
     UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL
     INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
     OFFICE AT UNIT NO.401,
     4TH FLOOR, SANGAM COMPLEX,
     127 ANDHERI, KURLA ROAD,
     ANDHERI (EAST),
     MUMBAI 400 047.
     MAHARASHTRA STATE.
     BRANCH OFFICE AT MYSURU
                                             -4-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC:23981
                                                       MFA No. 6759 of 2018
                                                C/W MFA.CROB No. 31 of 2019

    HC-KAR



         NO.363, 1ST FLOOR,
         GURUKAR DEVANNA STREET,
         FORT MOHALLA,
         MYSURU 570 004.
                                                              ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ASHOKA H, ADVOCATE FOR
 SRI. B C SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3
 NOTICE TO R1 & R2 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DTD 25.06.2025)

    THIS MFA.CROB IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 22 OF THE
CPC READ WITH SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.04.2018
PASSED IN MVC NO. 1027/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, AS A PRESIDING OFFICER,
MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MYSURU, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CALIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND
SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION AND ETC.


     THIS APPEAL AND CROSS OBJECTION, COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS
UNDER:

CORAM:           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

                                   ORAL JUDGMENT

The appeal and cross objection call in question the

judgment and award dated 17.4.2018 passed in MVC

No.1027/2014 by the Principal Judge, Court of Small Causes,

as a Presiding Officer, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,

Mysuru1. The Tribunal vide the said judgment and award

partly allowed the claim petition and has awarded a

compensation of `16,22,000/- together with interest at 7% p.a.

Hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal'

NC: 2025:KHC:23981

HC-KAR

The insurer has filed the appeal challenging the quantum of

compensation seeking for reduction and the claimant has filed

the cross objection for enhancement of the quantum of

compensation.

2. Heard the submissions of learned counsel Sri

B.C.Shivanne Gowda, for the insurer and learned counsel Sri

Shivanand appearing for learned counsel Sri P.Nataraj, for the

claimant.

3. The findings of the Tribunal on negligence and

liability are not under challenge and have attained finality.

Hence, the only aspect that is required to be considered in the

present appeal is with regard to the adequacy of the

compensation awarded.

4. The age of the deceased is 45 years as on the date

of the accident i.e., as on 27.1.2014. The Tribunal has applied

the multiplier of 14, which is just and proper.

5. It was averred that the claimant was a Civil

Contractor. However, no documents were produced to

demonstrate his income. The Tribunal has assessed his income

NC: 2025:KHC:23981

HC-KAR

at `13,500/- p.m. Having regard to the fact that no documents

have been produced to demonstrate his income, keeping in

mind the date of the accident, the same is re-assessed as

notional income at `8,500/- p.m.

6. To the said income, 25% is to be added towards

future prospects in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance Company

Ltd v. Pranay Sethi2 and 1/3rd is to be deducted towards

personal expenses since the deceased was married and

survived by 3 dependents/claimants. Hence, loss of

dependency is re-assessed as (`8,500/- + 25% - 1/3 x12x14)

`11,90,112/- as against `15,12,000/- awarded by the Tribunal.

7. Loss of consortium is to be awarded to the

claimants in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of Magma General Insurance Company v.

Nanu Ram Alias Chubru Ram3 at `40,000/- each together

with an escalation of 20%. Hence, loss of consortium is re-

assessed as (`48,000/-x3) `1,44,000/-. The compensation

towards funeral expenses and loss of estate also has to be

(2017)16 SCC 680

(2018)18 SCC 130

NC: 2025:KHC:23981

HC-KAR

awarded in terms of the aforesaid judgment in a sum of

`15,000/- each together with escalation at 20% and

accordingly, a sum of `18,000/- each is awarded towards the

same.

8. In view of the compensation awarded towards loss

of consortium, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal

towards loss of love and affection at `40,000/-, is set aside.

9. It is noticed that the Tribunal has awarded interest

at 7% p.a. Taking judicial notice of the interest payable

towards fixed deposits, the rate of interest awarded by the

Tribunal at 7% p.a., is just and proper.

10. In view of the aforementioned, the compensation re-assessed is as follows:

Sl. Compensation Head Amount Amount awarded No Awarded by the by this Court (`) Tribunal (`) 1 Loss of dependency 1512000.00 1190112.00 2 Loss of estate 15000.00 18000.00 3 Loss of consortium 40000.00 144000.00 4 Funeral expenses 15000.00 18000.00 5 Loss of love and affection 40000.00 0.00 Total 1622000.00 1370112.00

NC: 2025:KHC:23981

HC-KAR

11. Accordingly, the claimants are entitled to total

compensation of `13,70,112/- as against `16,22,000/- awarded

by the Tribunal.

12. In view of the aforementioned, the following:

ORDER

i) The appeal is allowed in part;

ii) The cross objection is disposed of;

iii) The judgment and award dated 17.4.2018 passed in MVC No.1027/2014 by the Principal Judge, Court of Small Causes, as a Presiding Officer, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mysuru, is hereby modified holding that the claimants shall be entitled to a total compensation of `13,70,112/- together with interest at 7% p.a., from the date of petition till date of realization. In all other respects, the judgment and award of the Tribunal remains unaltered;

iv) The amount deposited by the appellant in MFA No.6759/2018 together with records be transmitted to the Tribunal for disbursement in terms of the award. The balance amount, if any, to be deposited within six weeks;

NC: 2025:KHC:23981

HC-KAR

v) The Registry to draw the modified award accordingly;

No costs.

Sd/-

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

ND

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter