Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3077 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1726
RPFC No. 100222 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100222 OF 2024 (-)
BETWEEN:
CHANNABASAPPA
S/O. AJJAPPA YARAVINATALI,
AGE. 46 YEARS,
OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. GUTTAL,
TQ.DIST. HAVERI-581108.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. S. KORISHETTAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. PRAVATHI ALIAS KAVITA
W/O. CHANNABASAPPA YARAVINATALI,
AGE. 38 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/O.C/O. NAGAPPA SHIDDANAGOUDAR,
NELOGAL VILLAGE,
MANJANNA TQ.DIST. HAVERI-581108.
E
...RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by
MANJANNA E
Location: High Court of
Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
Date: 2025.02.01 11:43:07
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT
+0530
ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND TO SET ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND ORDERS PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
FAMILY COURT, HAVERI, DATED 05.07.2024 IN
CRI.MISC.NO.100/2023, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1726
RPFC No. 100222 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner.
2. This petition is filed by the respondent -
husband challenging the order dated 05.07.2024 in
Crl.Misc.No.100/2023 on the file of the Principal Judge,
Family Court, Haveri1 granting maintenance of Rs.7,000/-
per month to the respondent herein.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are
referred to as per their ranking before the Family Court.
4. It is the case of the petitioner before the Family
Court that the marriage between the petitioner and
respondent was solemnized on 26.04.2007 and in their
wedlock, no children were born. It is further stated in the
petition that, after the marriage the petitioner has joined
the respondent to lead marital life, however, the family
members of the respondent and the respondent, have not
Hereinafter referred to as 'Family Court'
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1726
taken care of the petitioner and have not provided basic
needs to the petitioner and as such, the petitioner has left
the matrimonial home and residing with her parents.
Hence, the petitioner has filed Crl.Misc.No.100/2023
before the Family court seeking maintenance.
5. After service of notice, the respondent -
husband entered appearance and filed detailed statement
of objection denying the averments made in the petition
and took up a specific contention that the petitioner
herself left the matrimonial home without any cause and
accordingly sought for dismissal of the petition.
6. The Family Court after considering the material
on record, by its order dated 05.07.2024, allowed the
petition in part by directing the respondent - husband to
pay monthly maintenance of Rs.7,000/- per month to the
petitioner. Feeling aggrieved by the same, the respondent
- husband has preferred this petition.
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1726
7. I have heard Sri.K.S.Korishettar, learned
counsel for the petitioner.
8. It is the submission of the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner herein is
innocent and has no worldly knowledge about marriage
and other aspects in life and also it is stated that the
allegation made by the respondent herein in the petition is
without any proof and accordingly sought for interference
of this Court.
9. Having taken note of the submission of the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, it is not in
dispute that the marriage between petitioner and
respondent was solemnized on 26.04.2007 and thereafter
the respondent herein has left matrimonial home by
making certain allegations against the petitioner herein
and his family members. It is also not in dispute that the
respondent herein is residing with her parents. Taking into
consideration the finding recorded by the Family Court, as
the respondent herein is residing with her parents and
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1726
therefore finding recorded by the Family Court granting
monthly maintenance of Rs.7,000/- to the respondent
herein is just and proper taking into account the medical
expenses and other aspects of the respondent herein.
Accordingly, no interference is called for in this petition.
10. In view of the aforementioned, the petition is
dismissed.
Sd/-
(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SH CT:ANB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!