Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri Shankrappa Ambali vs The Stateof Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 2183 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2183 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Shri Shankrappa Ambali vs The Stateof Karnataka on 10 January, 2025

                         -1-




 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

                      PRESENT

     THE HON'BLE MR. N.V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE

                         AND

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. ARAVIND

     WRIT PETITION NO. 27303 OF 2023 (GM-RES-PIL)

BETWEEN:

SHRI SHANKRAPPA AMBALI
S/O RUDRAPPA
AGE: 56 YEARS
OCCUPATION: FARMER
R/AT: PT. HEBBAL
TQ: NAVALGUND
DT: DHARWAD-582 208
                                       ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI SANKET SHANKRAPPA AMBALI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       REPRESENTED BY
       ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
       DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
       GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
       VIKAS SOUDHA
       BENGALURU-560 001

2.     REGIONAL COMMISSIONER
       BELAGAVI DIVISION
       OFFICE OF REGIONAL COMMISSIONER
       BELAGAVI-590 001
                         -2-



3.   DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
     DHARWAD DISTRICT
     D.C. COMPOUND
     DHARWAD-580 001

4.   CHIEF ENGINEER
     MALAPRABHA PROJECT ZONE
     KNNL
     DHARWAD-580 001

5.   MEMBER SECRETARY
     MALAPRABHA PROJECT IRRIGATION
     ADVISORY COMMITTEE/
     SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER
     M.L.B.C. CIRCLE, KNNL
     NAVILUTEERTHA
     SAVADATTI
     BELAGAVI-591 116
                                ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-4; SRI B R PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R-5)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT/ORDER/DIRECTION OF APPROPRIATE NATURE TO INVESTIGATE THE USE OF WATER IN NAVILUTEERTHA RESERVOIR, SUBSEQUENTLY FORM A COMPETENT COMMITTEE TO DRAFT A 'SCHEME FOR USE OF WATER OF THE NAVILUTEERTHA RESERVOIR' BASED ON GROUND ANALYSIS OF DEMAND FOR DRINKING WATER AND BY MANDATORILY RESERVING A PORTION OF IT FOR IRRIGATION IN EVERY SEASON AND PROHIBITING THE USE OF WATER FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSE AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS PRONOUNCED AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. ARAVIND

C.A.V. JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)

Heard learned advocate Mr. Sanket Shankrappa Ambali

for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate

Smt. Niloufer Akbar for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and learned

advocate Mr. B.R. Prashanth for respondent No.5.

2. The present public interest petition is filed by the

petitioner who claims to be a farmer by occupation as also the

State President of the Karnataka Rait Sene which is a

registered society of farmers. It is claimed that the petitioner

fights for the farmers' rights.

2.1 The prayer advanced in this public interest petition is to

direct the authorities to investigate the use of water in

Naviluteertha reservoir and to form a competent committee to

draft a scheme for use of water of the Naviluteertha reservoir

based on ground analysis of demand for drinking water. It is

prayed to mandatorily reserve a portion of water for irrigation in

every season and to prohibit the use of water for industrial

purpose.

2.2 Further prayer is made to direct the respondent-State to

pay compensation to the farmers of the notified area of

Malaprabha Irrigation Project based on the land holding,

whenever the State fails to supply water for irrigation. The third

part of the prayer is to direct the respondents-authorities not to

act in arbitrary manner and to pass necessary orders to stop

the use of water in the Naviluteertha reservoir and its canal

network for irrigation purpose.

3. The case pleaded by the petitioner is inter alia that

Renuka Sagar Dam constructed across the river Malaprabha at

Munolli Village, Savadatti Taluka of Belagavi District forms the

Naviluteertha Reservoir. It was a project proposed by the

Government of Bombay in the Second Five Year Plan of the

State to provide irrigation facilities to three districts namely,

Bijapur, Belgaum and Dharwad. The project was given

administrative sanction by the State of Mysore on

27/28.11.1961, it was stated, after getting clearance from the

Central Water and Power Commission.

3.1 The project seeks to irrigate 3,00,000 Acres of land. It is

the grievance of the petitioner that although the project was

designed for the purpose of extending irrigation facilities and

irrigation water, gradually, the State authorities started using

the reservoir for the purpose of providing drinking water to

meet with the drinking water demand of Hubli-Dharwad twin

cities and to fill the rural water tanks in the Malaprabha

command area. It is stated that the interstate Mahadayi water

dispute has its impact on balancing of the drinking water

demand stress on the Naviluteertha reservoir.

3.2 It is further stated that respondent No.3-the District

Commissioner, Dharwad, passed the order in August 2023 to

release 0.907 TMC of water for drinking water purpose with a

condition not to use the same for any other purpose. It was

provided that if water is used for any other purpose, legal

action will be taken and the unauthorised pump sets will be

seized under the provisions of the Karnataka Irrigation Act,

1965.

3.3 The crux of the grievance is that the said reservoir was

constructed for the purpose of irrigation which is now used for

industrial purpose. It is alleged that in the name of providing

drinking water, the water is diverted for industrial purpose. It is

stated that any scientific analysis for demand of drinking water

is not undertaken in order to justify the use of water for any

purpose other than the irrigation.

3.4 It is alleged that in the guise of drinking water purpose,

the respondents-authorities are conspiring to help the

industries and on the other hand, deprived the farmers of

irrigational water.

4. Learned advocate for the petitioner submitted with

reference to Section 29 of the Karnataka Irrigation Act, 1965

that releasing the water for irrigational purpose is a statutory

right and could not have been curtailed by the authorities by

diverting the water from the reservoir to industrial or drinking

purposes. Also relied on by learned advocate was the details

of the water level in the reservoir as on 05.08.2023 and that of

the previous year on 05.08.2022. The meeting dated

05.08.2023 held under the Chairmanship of the Regional

Commissioner, Belagavi Division, regarding systematic use of

water stored in Naviluteertha reservoir only for drinking

purpose was relied on for the various details of drinking water

requirements than other fillings, to highlight that the entire

purpose of the reservoir which was for irrigation, is tinkered

with.

4.1 In response to the notice issued in the petition, the

respondents entered appearance and filed the statement of

objections/affidavit-in-reply. Learned Additional Government

Advocate made submissions highlighting the contents and the

contentions from the statement of objections.

4.2 About the dam water level as well as the allocation of

water, it was stated thus,

"...during 1972, when the dam was being constructed, it was designed for 37 TMC and Full Reservoir Level (FRL) etc., were fixed as no guage date was available in those days for measuring the quantum of water. The quantum was calculated using Empirical formulae. The allocation of water for Malaprabha Project was 44 TMC. It was observed during 2008-09 that the dam was filled to its Full Reservoir Level only for 6 years from its completion. The Upper reaches of the Malaprabha catchment area (Khanapura Taluk of Belagavi District) receives a rainfall of 4000 mili meters, but catchment coming under chronically drought, hits Taluks of Bailhongal, Saundatti receives rainfall less than 500 mili meters. After studying the inflow details of Malaprabha (Navilutheertha) dam, 75% of dependable water yield works out to 27 TMC.

Accordingly, for Malaprabha project, 27 TMC allocation of water was made in the Master Plan for Krishna basis project by the Water Resources Department, Government of

Karnataka. As of now, water planning is done for 27 TMC only, which includes 24.234 TMC for irrigation, 0.201 TMC for drinking water, 0.015 TMC for industrial use and 2.550 TMC for evaporations losses."

4.2.1 It was the further stand of the authorities that modified

project for Rs.162.09 crores was approved by the Government

of Karnataka by the order dated 04.02.1980. It was with a

view to provide fullest utilization of the available water and to

provide irrigational facilities on the Left Bank of the river to the

districts of Belagavi and Bagalkot for irrigating about 2.132 lakh

hectares of land. The revised cost estimate of the project was

obtained for Malaprabha project and various Lift Irrigation

Schemes were acted upon by utilizing 27 TMC of water in

Krishna basin which was approved by the Government.

4.2.2 The affidavit-in-reply mentions the Detailed Project

Report dated 07.10.2009 as to utilization of water in the

Malaprabha project, extracting the relevant part as under,

"(1) The water for irrigation, drinking purpose and Industrial use is being utilized as per the allocation of 27 TMC made to Malaprabha project in the Master Plan for Krishna basin project by the Water Resources Department, Government of Karnataka. As such now, the water planning is done for 27 TMC only which includes 24.234 TMC for irrigation, 0.201 TMC for drinking water, 0.015 TMC for Industrial use and 2.550 TMC for evaporation

losses. Presently, the drinking water demand has increased and hence, the water for drinking purpose is given first priority as per the increase in population, which demand will definitely increase in future.

(2) The water users for Co-operative Societies along with a Mahamandala i.e. Apex Level Federation of Societies are formed as per the Irrigation Act, 1965 Chapter-IX A Section 62(A)."

4.2.3 The following is further given out in the affidavit,

(a) A meeting was held on 05.08.2014 under the Chairmanship of the Regional Commissioner, Belagavi, to plan out the strategy to meet with the immediate drinking water demands. Pursuant to the decision taken, release of the water to the extent of 0.907 TMC for drinking purpose was ordered.

(b) On 20.09.2023, the Irrigation Consultation Committee held a meeting, wherein also the scarcity of the storage of water in the Malaprabha dam was considered. It was decided to release the water for drinking purpose as per the demand through Renuka Lift Irrigation Scheme (RLIS) Canal and Malaprabha Right Bank Canal to the extent of 1.00 TMC for fifteen days.

(c) Again, a meeting of the Irrigation Consultation Committee was convened on 04.11.2023 and again it was decided to release the water for drinking purpose for filling tanks and groundwater charging in view of the demand through Singarkoppa Lift Irrigation Scheme Canal and Malaprabha Right Bank Canal.

- 10 -

4.2.4 A press note dated 04.11.2023 was issued in light of the

aforesaid decisions by the Member Secretary of the Irrigation

Consultation Committee informing the farmers not to start

sowing operations in view of depletion of the water level.

4.2.5 It is stated that right from the date of construction in the

year 1973 till the year 2024, the Malaprabha dam has reached

its full level only on nine occasions in the last fifty years. The

water calculation for utilization of the water for the next year is

done depending upon the post monsoon situation and the

availability of water in the reservoir. It is further stated that

having regard to the availability of water stored in the

Malaprabha dam during the year, the Expert Committee, in

consultation with the farmers and their representatives, decided

about the modalities for use of the water of the Malaprabha

reservoir considering the priority for drinking purpose, for

irrigation purpose and for industrial use.

5. The Malaprabha river rises in the Western Ghats at an

altitude of 793 meters for about 16 kms. of Jamboti in Belagavi

District of Karnataka State. This river flows towards the East

and thereafter, in the North-East direction to join Krishna river

at an elevation of about 488 meters about 306 kms. from its

- 11 -

source. The total catchment area of Malaprabha and its

distributaries is 11,549 sq.kms. A project was taken up for

construction of a storage dam at Peacock Gorge near Manoli

and a Right Bank Canal to irrigate about 1.22 lakh hectares in

the scarcity tracts of Navalagund, Naragund and Ron Taluks.

The project was named as Malaprahba Project, originally

approved at an expense of Rs.20 crores as per the

Government Order dated 27.11.1961.

5.1 In light of the facts stated in the reply, it could be seen

that the respondents have been managing and chalking out the

mechanism for utilizing the water from the reservoir depending

upon priority area where the water is to be supplied and

considering the availability vis-a-vis the need of the water.

Committees are formed for releasing the water for irrigation

combined with drinking water. At the end of the monsoon, the

situation is assessed, the availability of water in the reservoir is

ascertained and the demand is considered.

5.2 The Malaprabha Dam is a multipurpose dam whose

water is used for irrigation, drinking and industrial purposes

having regard to the priorities set in this regard depending upon

the availability of the water. It was stated also that every such

- 12 -

action of the management in the Irrigation Department is

guided by the Karnataka Irrigation Act, 1965.

5.3 It is to be observed that in making such expert decisions,

the farmers are also involved and their interest and welfare is

also safeguarded. The farmers are informed in advance about

the availability of the water.

5.4 If in a given point of time, the experts in the water

management give priority to use the water for drinking

purposes, the decision could not be faulted, for, it is taken after

assessing the merits of the attendant aspects and after going

through the relevant considerations of priority, need and the

availability of the water in the reservoir. The drinking water

becomes the first priority followed by irrigation and thereafter

for industrial use in a given year.

5.5 For all the above reasons, it is clear that the

respondents-authorities have been attending to the water

management aspects for utilizing the water for different

purposes from the reservoir. The water management is

undoubtedly an expert field where the expert's views have to

be implemented by looking into the ground realities and by

supplying to the needs which may arise for consumption of

- 13 -

water for drinking purposes and for irrigation purposes in

proper ratio.

5.6 If the portion of the water from the reservoir is released

for drinking purpose, any unlawfulness does not arise in such

action. Such action could not be branded arbitrary when

guided by the germane considerations for proper water

management and due water utilization. Even otherwise, as

stated above, the allocation of water for different purposes

such as, drinking, irrigational or industrial is an expert

management. There are no judicially manageable criteria in

this regard.

6. For all the aforesaid reasons, the public interest petition

is not liable to be entertained. The reliefs could not be granted.

7. The petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

(N.V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

(K.V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

BKV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter