Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manjunath S/O Beerappa Deshabhandari vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 4299 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4299 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Manjunath S/O Beerappa Deshabhandari vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 February, 2025

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar
Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar
                                                                       -1-
                                                                                     NC: 2025:KHC-D:3568
                                                                              CRL.A No. 100047 of 2025




                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                                                 DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
                                                                     BEFORE
                                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                                         CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100047 OF 2025 (U/S 14 A(2) of SC and ST ACT)

                                        BETWEEN:

                                        MANJUNATH
                                        S/O. BEERAPPA DESHABHANDARI
                                        AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESSMAN,
                                        R/O. NAVAGRAMMA, DIVAGI, KUMTA,
                                        UTTARA KANNADA-581359.
                                                                                   ...APPELLANT
                                        (BY SMT. POOJA RAJSHEKAR SAVADATTI, ADVOCATE)

                                        AND:

                                        1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                                             (KUMTA POLICE STATION),
                                             R/BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                                             HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                             DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-580011.

                                        2.   SMT. SHOBHA PRABHAKAR MUKRI
                                             AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
                Digitally signed by B
                K
                MAHENDRAKUMAR
                                             R/O. CHANDAVAR, TQ. HONNAVAR,
BK
MAHENDRAKUMAR
                Location: HIGH
                COURT OF
                KARNATAKA
                                             NOW AT DIVAGI, KUMTA,
                DHARWAD BENCH
                Date: 2025.02.22
                11:47:46 +0530
                                             UTTARA KANNADA-581359.

                                        3.   SMT. PUSHPA MANJUNATH MUKRI
                                             AGE. 27 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE,
                                             R/O. KELAGINAMANI, DIVAGI, KUMTA,
                                             UTTARA KANNADA-581359.
                                                                                ...RESPONDENTS
                                        (BY SRI. PRAVEENA Y.DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP FOR R1;
                                         NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 ARE SERVED)

                                              THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 14 A (2) OF SC AND ST
                                        (POA) AMENDMENT ACT, 2015, SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE
                                        IMPUGNED ORDER IN CRL.MISC CASE NO.468/2024, DATED
                                        08.01.2024, ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
                                  -2-
                                              NC: 2025:KHC-D:3568
                                        CRL.A No. 100047 of 2025




JUDGE, UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR         AND CONSEQUENTLY
ALLOW THE BAIL APPLICATION FILED BY APPELLANT U/S 14 A (2)
OF SC AND ST (POA) AMENDMENT ACT, 2015, AND A DIRECTION
BE ISSUED TO THE KUMTA POLICE STATION TO ENLARGE THE
PRESENT APPELLANT ON BAIL, WHO IS ARRAYED AS ACCUSED
NO.1, ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CONNECTION
WITH KUMTA P.S. CRIME NO.244/2024, FOR THE OFFENCE
PUNISHABLE U/S 420 OF IPC AND U/S 3(2)(Va), 3(2)(Vii) OF SC/ST
(PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

                         ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The appellant/Accused No.1, who is facing investigation for offences punishable under Section 420 of the IPC and Sections 3(2)(va) and 3(2)(vii) of the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, has approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail.

2. The prosecution alleges that Accused No.1, fully aware that the complainant's sister had received a compensation amount of ₹1,50,000/- from the Social Welfare Department, colluded with Accused No.2, who was working in the Social Welfare Department in Kumta, and received a sum of ₹25,000/- via PhonePe and ₹38,823/- in cash, totaling ₹63,823/-. It is alleged that the accused misrepresented that a portion of the compensation amount had to be remitted to the government and issued false and fabricated challans.

3. To substantiate the allegations, the complainant has produced screenshots of the PhonePe transaction and remittance

NC: 2025:KHC-D:3568

challans. The accused has also provided receipts claiming that the amount was remitted to the government.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent - State.

5. Admittedly, there is no specific allegation against Accused No.1 for offences punishable under the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The primary allegation is that Accused No.1 induced the complainant to part with a portion of the compensation amount under the pretext of remitting it to the government. The appellant contends that the alleged payments were made by the complainant's husband, who has not filed any complaint.

6. In light of the circumstances, the appellant has established a prima facie case for being granted bail in the event of his arrest.

Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

a) The appeal is allowed.

b) The impugned order dated 08.01.2025 passed by the II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Uttar Kannada, Karwar, in Crl.M.No.468/2024 is hereby set aside. The Kumata Police Station

NC: 2025:KHC-D:3568

is hereby directed to release the appellant on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.244/2024, subject to following conditions:

i. Appellant/accused shall furnish indemnity bond for a sum of Rs.1 lakh with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

ii. He shall appear before the Investigating officer within a period of 15 days and execute bail bond and offer surety.

iii. He shall make himself available for the purpose of investigation as and when required and he shall co- operate with the investigation.

iv. He shall furnish his residential address proof and shall inform the investigating officer/Court if there is any change in the address.

v. He shall mark his attendance at the jurisdictional Police station once in 15 days till filing of the charge sheet.

vi. He shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

vii. He shall be regular in attending the court proceedings.

Sd/-

(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE

TIN Ct:vh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter