Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr.Rakshitha V vs Union Of India
2025 Latest Caselaw 4097 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4097 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Dr.Rakshitha V vs Union Of India on 18 February, 2025

                                                -1-
                                                       NC: 2025:KHC:7093-DB
                                                       WP No. 4723 of 2025




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

                                           PRESENT
                          THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
                                                AND
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
                          WRIT PETITION NO. 4723 OF 2025 (EDN-RES)


                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    DR. RAKSHITHA V.
                         D/O M.G. VIJAY KUMAR
                         AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
                         R/O. No.364
                         OLD POST OFFICE ROAD
                         GUNIGANTIPALYA
                         MULBAGAL
                         KOLAR-563 131
                         NEET RANK: 19,475

                   2.    DR. GAUTAM M.M.
                         S/O MANJUNATH M.L.
                         AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
                         R/O No.1048/2
Digitally signed
by                       3RD CROSS, 2ND MAIN
CHANNEGOWDA
PREMA                    KTJ NAGARA
Location: High           DAVANAGERE-577 002
Court of
Karnataka                NEET RANK: 34,685
                                                          ...PETITIONERS
                   (BY SMT. HIREMATH AKKAMAHADEVI, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    UNION OF INDIA
                         DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES
                         MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
                         DGHS HEADQUARTERS, F-17
                         KARKARDOOMA
                           -2-
                                    NC: 2025:KHC:7093-DB
                                    WP No. 4723 of 2025




     NEW DELHI-110 032
     REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR

2.   NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION
     POCKET 14, SECTOR 8, DWARAKA
     NEW DELHI-110 007
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

3.   MEDICAL COUNSELLING COMMITTEE
     DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES
     MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMLY WELFARE
     GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
     No.354, NIRMAN BHAVAN
     DELHI-110 011
     REPRESETNED BY DIRECTOR

4.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
     DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION
     VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

5.  KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY (KEA)
    18TH CROSS ROAD, SAMPIGE ROAD
    MALLESHWARA-560 012
    BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, DSGI FOR R1 & R3;
    SRI. N. KHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
    SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R4;
    SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (a) ISSUE A WRIT
OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THAT PART OF THE ELIGIBILITY
CONDITION WHICH PERMITS PARTICIPATION IN THE STRAY
VACANCY ROUND VIDE THE 2ND BULLET POINT IN THE NOTICE
DATED 12.02.2025 IN No.REF.U-1202/04/2024-MEC, (ANN-C)
INSOFAR AS IT STATES IN BULLET POINT 2 THAT "HOWEVER,
'NOT REPORTED' CANDIDATES OF ROUND-3 OF MCC
COUNSELLING CAN PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE PG
COUNSELLING AND ETC.
                                 -3-
                                            NC: 2025:KHC:7093-DB
                                            WP No. 4723 of 2025




    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS
UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
          and
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL




                      ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari, quashing that part of the eligibility condition which permits participation in the Stray Vacancy Round vide the 2nd Bullet Point in the Notice dated 12.02.2025 in No.Ref.U-1202/04/2024-

MEC,(Ann-C) insofar as it states in Bullet Point 2 that "However,'Not Reported' Candidates of Round 3 of MCC Counseling can participate in the State PG Counseling", and

b) Issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 5th respondent to not include the candidates in the ensuing State Stray Vacancy Round who were allotted seats in the Round 3 of the All India Quota Counselling;

c) Such other writs or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.

NC: 2025:KHC:7093-DB

2. Heard Smt. Akkamahadevi Hiremath, learned

counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri. H. Shanthi

Bhushan, learned DSGI appearing for respondents No.1

and 3, Sri. M N Sudev Hegde, learned AGA for respondent

No.4 and Sri. N K Ramesh, learned counsel for KEA-

respondent No.5.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioners that Annexure - A judgment of this Court in

W.P.No.2848/2025 specifically directed the cancellation of

PG-Medical seats wrongly allotted in violation of the

provisions of the Brochure in the mop-up round of KEA

counseling. However, the MCC has further issued

Annexure-C notice dated 12.02.2025 permitting persons,

who did not report for round-3 of MCC counseling also to

participate in the State-PG counseling in the stray vacancy

round. Clauses 2 and 3 of Annexure-C notice dated

12.02.2025 read as follows:-

"Candidates who did not join their seats allotted through MCC in Round-3 are 'Not Eligible' to participate in Stray Vacancy Round of PG Counselling 2024 of MCC. However,

NC: 2025:KHC:7093-DB

'Not Reported' candidates of Round-3 of MCC counselling can participate in state PG counselling.

Candidates who have joined State quota seats through earlier Rounds are not eligible to participate in Stray Vacancy Round of PG Counselling 2024 of MCC."

The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that

persons who are found ineligible by this Court in

Annexure-A judgment would also be permitted to

participate in the light of Annexure-C notice.

4. Learned DSGI appearing for respondents No.1

and 3 however contends that the words "not reported" are

specifically intended to mean candidates, who did not

report or participate in the third round of MCC counseling

and that it does not mean that those persons who had

participated in the third round of MCC counseling but had

not joined the allotted colleges would be permitted to

participate in the KEA counseling in the stray vacancy

round.

5. It is submitted that this aspect of the matter is

specifically clarified by a further notice dated 14.02.2025

NC: 2025:KHC:7093-DB

which is also duly web hosted. It is submitted that the said

notice dated 14.02.2025 specifically clarifies that

candidates who did not join the seats allotted to them in

MCC Round-3 are not eligible to participate in the stray

vacancy round of PG-Counseling 2024. However, not

reported candidates of Round-3 MCC counseling can

participate in the State-PG Counseling. It is stated that the

clarificatory notice dated 14.02.2025 specifically makes it

clear that persons who had participated in the MCC third

round of counseling and were allotted seats but did not

join the allotted seats will not be eligible to participate in

the counseling. However, candidates who did not report or

participate in the 3rd round of MCC counseling can

participate in KEA stray vacancy round. It is submitted

that this is in consonance with the directions issued by this

Court in Annexure-A, judgment.

6. The said submission is recorded.

7. It is made clear that the eligibility for the stray

vacancy round of counseling to be conducted by the KEA

NC: 2025:KHC:7093-DB

will be strictly in accordance with Annexure-A judgment as

well as the notice of the MCC dated 14.02.2025.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

8. Registry shall take appropriate steps to see that

this order is uploaded today itself and the copy will be

made available to all the concerned. The KEA as well as

the MCC shall also take the appropriate steps to see that

the order is web hosted.

Sd/-

(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

Sd/-

(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

RAK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter