Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11685 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 December, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:54861
CRL.P No. 17214 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17214 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1. MR. E. ADITHYA,
S/O K. ESHWARAPPA,AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
R/A NO.17, 2ND CROSS,
ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
MAYURA NAGARA, HEGGANAHALLI,
PEENYA 2ND STAGE,BANGALORE NORTH,
VISHWANEEDAM, BANGALORE-560091.
2. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI
W/O. K. ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/A NO.17, 2ND CROSS,ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
NEAR CHANDRAGIRI BAR,
MAYURA NAGAR, PEENYA 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU 560091.
...PETITIONERS
Digitally (BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA C H.,ADVOCATE)
signed by C
HONNUR
SAB AND:
Location:
HIGH 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
COURT OF BY JNANABHARATHI POLICE STATION
KARNATAKA
NOW BY ANNAPORNESHWARI NAGAR P.S.
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001.
2. MS. MONISHA RAM
D/O RAMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,R/AT NO. 670,
5TH CROSS,
BALAJI LAYOUT, BENGALURU 560056
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:54861
CRL.P No. 17214 of 2025
HC-KAR
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT WAHEEDA M M, HCGP FOR R.1,
SRI CHANDAN B K, ADVOCATE FOR R.2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING
THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH
THE FIR AND CONSEQUENT INVESTIGATION IN
CR.NO.334/2025 REGISTERED ON 01.09.2025 BY
ANNAPORNESHWARI NAGAR P.S. FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.
69, 88, 115(2), 351(2) FO BNS, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS,
WHICH IS NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE VI
ADDL. CMM, BENGALURU CITY, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed to quash the FIR and consequent
investigation in Crime No.0334/2025 registered on
01.09.2025 before Annapurneshwari Nagara Police Station,
Bengaluru for the offences punishable under Sections 69, 88,
115(2), 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and to quash the
proceeding before the VI Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Bengaluru.
NC: 2025:KHC:54861
HC-KAR
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present,
learned respondent No.2 is present and learned High Court
Government Pleader is present.
3. The petitioners have filed an application in
I.A.No.1/2025 for compounding the offence. The application
is accompanied by joint affidavits filed by petitioners No.1
and 2 and respondent No. 2.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners and
respondent No.2 would also place reliance on the following
judgments of the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court:
(i) Sri.Ruthwik Chandra M vs. State of Karnataka and Another1
(ii) Akki Lakshmi Reddy vs. State of Karnataka and Another2
(iii) Mr.Fakirappa Hatti vs. State of Karnataka and Another3
and would submit that the case of this nature can be
compounded with the consent of both parties.
Criminal Petition No.6263/2025
Criminal Petition no.15001/2025
Criminal Petition No.11014/2024
NC: 2025:KHC:54861
HC-KAR
5. It is submitted that the aforementioned cases are
disposed of by accepting the settlement arrived at between
the parties though the offence alleged is under Section 376
of the Indian Penal Code.
6. The Court has made enquiry with the parties who
are present before the Court.
7. The complainant/respondent No.2 submits that
she has voluntarily entered into settlement.
8. After going through the affidavit filed by the
parties, the Court is of the view that complainant and the
petitioners have entered into settlement and they do not
intend to prosecute the matter any further. It is also noticed
that the charge sheet is not yet filed.
9. Under these circumstances accepting the
submissions and based on the ratio laid down in the
aforementioned cases, following order is passed:
NC: 2025:KHC:54861
HC-KAR
ORDER
(i) The application is allowed, consequently the
Criminal Petition is allowed.
(ii) FIR/complaint in Crime No.0334/2025 registered
on 01.09.2025 before Annapurneshwari Nagara
Police Station, Bengaluru is quashed.
(iii) In case the Investigating Agency has recovered
anything from the complainant or the accused,
the same shall be released after due
identification.
(iv) Bail bond if any executed stands cancelled.
Sd/-
(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
brn List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!