Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajashekar Alias K N Rajashekar vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 7887 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7887 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Rajashekar Alias K N Rajashekar vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 August, 2025

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                                  -1-
                                                              NC: 2025:KHC-D:11047
                                                         CRL.A No. 100365 of 2025


                     HC-KAR



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
                           DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
                                           BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                              CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100365 OF 2025
                                 (U/S 14 A(2) OF SC AND ST ACT)
                    BETWEEN:
                    RAJASHEKAR @ K.N. RAJASHEKAR
                    S/O. NARAPPA, AGE. 23 YEARS,
                    OCC. LABOURER, R/O. DAGGI BASAPUR,
                    TQ. HARAPANAHALLI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-591 222.
                                                                         ... APPELLANT
                    (BY SRI. RAJA RAGHAVENDRA NAIK, ADVOCATE)

                    AND:
                    1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                          THROUGH ARASIKERE POLICE STATION, ARASIKERE,
                          REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                          HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                          DHARWAD BENCH-580 001.

                    2.    GOURAMMA W/O. LATE RAVIKUMARA,
                          AGE. 28 YEARS, OCC. LABOURER,
                          R/O. JARAKATTE VILLAGE,
                          TQ. AND DIST. DAVANAGERE,
        Digitally
                          PRESENT R/O. LOKURU VILLAGE,
        signed by
        RAKESH S          BELAGAVI-590 001.
RAKESH HARIHAR                                                         ... RESPONDENTS
S       Location:
        HIGH
HARIHAR COURT OF    (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; R2-SERVED)
        KARNATAKA
        DHARWAD
        BENCH
                          THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14A(2) OF
                    SC/ST (POA) ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
                    21.05.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
                    SESSION JUDGE, FTSC-1, BALLARI IN SPECIAL C.NO.659/2025 AND
                    GRANT BAIL IN CRIME NO.37/2025 OF ARASIKERE P.S. FOR THE
                    OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 115(2), 351(2), 352, 75(2),
                    70(1) R/W 3(5) OF BNSS AND UNDER SECTIONS 3(1)(R)(W)(I), 3(2), (V-
                    A) AND 3(2)(V) OF PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES ACT, SC/ST ACT AND TO
                    ALLOW APPEAL WITH RESPECT TO APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 IN THE
                    INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

                         THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT IS
                    DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                -2-
                                           NC: 2025:KHC-D:11047
                                      CRL.A No. 100365 of 2025


HC-KAR




                         ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

Accused No.2 in Special Case No.659 of 2025 pending

before the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-

I, Ballari, arising out of Crime No.37/2025 registered by

Arasikere Police Station, Vijayanagara District for offences

punishable under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 352, 75(2), 70(1)

read with Section 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r),

3(2)(w)(i), 3(2)(v-a) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is before

this Court in this bail application filed under Section 14-A(2) of

the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking regular bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that,

allegation against accused Nos.1 to 3 is similar in the charge

sheet. Accused Nos.1 and 3 have been granted regular bail by

this Court in Criminal Appeal No.100441 of 2025 connected with

Criminal Petition No.100373 of 2025 disposed of on 05.08.2025

NC: 2025:KHC-D:11047

HC-KAR

Appellant has no other criminal antecedent. Accordingly, he

prays to allow the appeal.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP, who has opposed the

prayer made in the appeal, does not dispute the submission

made by learned counsel for the appellant.

5. Perusal of the material on record would go to show

that allegations as against accused Nos.1 to 3 are similar in the

first information as well as in the charge sheet filed in the

present case. Accused Nos.1 and 3 have been granted regular

bail by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.100441 of 2025

connected with Criminal Appeal No.100373 of 2025 disposed of

on 05.08.2025 by a detailed order.

6. Under the circumstances, for the reason stated in the

orders passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.100441 of

2025 connected with Criminal Appeal No.100373 of 2025, the

prayer made by the appellant as against whom similar

allegations are found, needs to be granted. Accordingly, the

following:

NC: 2025:KHC-D:11047

HC-KAR

ORDER

Criminal Appeal is allowed.

The order dated 21.05.2025 passed by the Court of

Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Ballari in Special

Case No.659 of 2025 is hereby set aside.

The appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail in Special

Case No.659 of 2025 pending before the Court of Additional

District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Ballari, arising out of Crime

No.37/2025 registered by Arasikere Police Station, Vijayanagara

District for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 351(2),

352, 75(2), 70(1) read with Section 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and

Sections 3(1)(r), 3(2)(w)(i), 3(2)(v-a) and 3(2)(v) of the

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)

Act, 1989, subject to the following conditions:

i. The appellant shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (one lakh only) with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

ii. The appellant shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless

NC: 2025:KHC-D:11047

HC-KAR

the Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid reasons;

iii. The appellant shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;

iv. The appellant shall not involve in similar offences in future.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

RSH CT:BCK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter