Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5857 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 August, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:32277
MSA No. 177 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 177 OF 2025 (RO)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI BHADRINATH SHASTRI
S/O LATE K.KRISHNA SHASTRI,
AGED ABOUT: 67 YEARS,
R/AT NO.57, VASUNDARA,
1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
SOUNDARYANAGAR,
NAGASANDRA POST,
SIDDEDAHALLI,
BENGALURU.
2. SMT. MANDAKINI,
W/O T.B. SHIVARAM,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
R/AT: #57, VASUNDARA,
1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
SOUNDARYANAGAR,
Digitally NAGASANDRA POST,
signed by R
MANJUNATHA SIDDEDAHALLI, BENGALURU.
Location:
HIGH COURT 3. SMT. JANAKI,
OF W/O T.B. ANANTHARAM,
KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
R/AT:#57, VASUNDARA,
1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
SOUNDARYANAGAR,
NAGASANDRA POST,
SIDDEDAHALLI, BENGALURU.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR K.S., ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:32277
MSA No. 177 of 2025
HC-KAR
AND:
1. SRI HANUMANTHAPPA
S/O MURIGEPPA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
AGRICUTLURISTS/BUSINESSMAN,
R/AT AMARAVATHI VILLAGE,
HARIHAR TALUK.
2. SRI. MANJUNATHA,
S/O LATE KRISHNA SHASTRI,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/AT #57, VASUNDARA,
1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
SOUNDARYANAGAR,
NAGASANDRA POST,
SIDDEDAHALLI, BENGALURU.
3. SRI. SOMANATHA SHASTRI,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/AT #57, VASUNDARA,
1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
SOUNDARYANAGAR,
NAGASANDRA POST,
SIDDEDAHALLI, BENGALURU.
...RESPONDENTS
***
THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 43 RULE (1)(u) OF
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 13.06.2025 PASSED IN R.A.No.14/2018
ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
HARIHAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.01.2018 PASSED IN O.S.
No.20/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC, HARIHAR, FOR FRESH DISPOSAL TO LEAD FURTHER
EVIDENCE.
THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:32277
MSA No. 177 of 2025
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo,
seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal,
with liberty to urge other grounds in the suit. The memo
reads as under:
"The appellants in the above appeal most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court kindly permit them to withdraw the appeal, with liberty to urge other grounds in the suit."
2. Placing the memo on record, the appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn. All contentions are left open for
the parties to urge before the Trial Court, in accordance
with law.
In view of withdrawal of the appeal, pending
I.A.No.1/2025 does not survive for consideration.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
BMV*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!