Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5800 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:32051-DB
WA No. 1085 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1085 OF 2025 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU 560 001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT,
RAMANAGARA 571 511.
3. THE TAHSILDAR,
Digitally
signed by RAMANAGARA TALUK,
SRIDEVI S RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 571 511.
Location: ...APPELLANTS
High Court
of Karnataka (BY SRI. K.S. HARISH, GOVT ADVOCATE.,)
AND:
1. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA
SINCE DECEASED BY HER LR'S
1(a) SMT BRAMARA
D/O LATE C.R. GUNDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:32051-DB
WA No. 1085 of 2025
HC-KAR
1(b) SMT. SHAKUNTALA
D/O LATE C.R. GUNDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
1(c) SMT. INDIRA
D/O LATE C.R. GUNDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 286,
11TH MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS,
HANUMANTHANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 019
...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO MODIFY THE
ORDER DATED 27/01/2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION NO.33856/2015 (S-RES) BY
CLARIFYING THE STAND OF THE STATE REGARDING THE
SAID ORDER NOT BEING TREATED AS THE PRECEDENT AND
& ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN
AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU ,CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:32051-DB
WA No. 1085 of 2025
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU,CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The learned counsel for the appellants seeks to withdraw
the present appeal as he fairly states that there is no credible
ground for condoning the inordinate delay.
2. He however requests that it be clarified that the withdrawal of
the present appeal may not preclude the appellants from agitating
the questions involved.
3. We also clarify that the dismissal of the present appeal would
not be read as this court upholding the findings in regard to the
questions of law as raised by the appellants.
4. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending interlocutory
application is also disposed of.
Sd/-
(VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
(C M JOSHI) JUDGE SD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!