Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukund S/O Limbaji Shep And Ors vs Bandu S/O Shesherao Jadhav And Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 22637 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22637 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Mukund S/O Limbaji Shep And Ors vs Bandu S/O Shesherao Jadhav And Anr on 5 September, 2024

Author: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

                                              -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC-K:6697
                                                     MFA No. 200631 of 2017




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

                                            BEFORE

                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.200631 OF 2017 (MV-I)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   MUKUND S/O LIMBAJI SHEP
                        AGE: 91 YEARS, OCC: NILL

                   2.   BAMUBAI W/O MUKUND SHEP
                        AGE: 91 YEARS, OCC: NIL

                   3.   SAKKUBAI W/O HARISHCHANDRA SHEP
                        AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD

                   4.   JYOTI D/O HARISHCHANDRA SHEP
                        AGE: 17 YEARS M/G BY APPELLANT NO.3

Digitally signed   5.   LAXMAN S/O HARISHCHANDRA SHEP
by SUMITRA              AGE: 13 YEARS M/G BY APPELLANT NO.3
SHERIGAR
Location: HIGH          ALL ARE R/O. KANNAPUR MOVA
COURT OF
KARNATAKA               TQ: PARAVI, DIST: BEED-484446.


                                                            ...APPELLANTS
                   (BY SRI. SANGANAGOUDA V. BIRADAR, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   BANDU S/O SHESHERAO JADHAV
                        AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
                        R/O. TELGAON,
                        TQ: DHARUR, DIST: BEED-584446.
                                 -2-
                                                NC: 2024:KHC-K:6697
                                         MFA No. 200631 of 2017




2.   THE BRANCHD MANAGER
     UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.
     VIJAYAPUR-586101.


                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SUDARSHAN M. ADV. FOR R2;
    NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPWNSED WITH)

     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO
ALLOW THE APPEAL BY MODIFYING THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
AND AWARD DATED-29.06.2016 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT-V, VIJAYAPUR IN MVC NO.1680/2011
AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO ENHANCE THE
COMPENSATION FROM RS.7,80,000/- TO RS.15,00,000/- WITH
INTEREST @ 12% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL ACTUAL REALIZATION BY PASTING THE LIABILITY ON
RESPONDENT NO.2 INSURANCE COMPANY AND ETC.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

                      ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA)

1. The claim petition as against the insurer was

dismissed after the Tribunal recorded a finding that the

deceased was sitting on the mud guard of the tractor.

NC: 2024:KHC-K:6697

2. The claimant being aggrieved of the exoneration of

this liability is before this court in appeal so the claimants

also seek for enhancement.

3. In the light of the judgment rendered by the full

court in the case of Gadhilingappa alias Gadhilinga and

another vs. K.Guleppa K.Lingappa and another,

MFA.CROB.NO.100001/2016 dated 20.04.2021

reported in AIR 2021 Karnataka 102 AIR online

2021 KAR 411 where the full court has held that the

insurer would not be liable for payment of compensation if

a person was traveling on the mudguard of a trailer. In

view of the above, the finding recorded by the Tribunal

cannot be found fault with.

4. Thus on the question of liability, the award of the

Tribunal will have to be confirmed.

5. In order to arrive at the loss of dependency, the

Tribunal has determined the monthly income, notionally at

Rs.5,000/-. As there is no credible evidence to ascertain

NC: 2024:KHC-K:6697

the actual monthly income, it would be appropriate and

prudent to adopt the monthly income determined by

Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, which, for the

accident of the year 2011, would be Rs.6,000/-.

6. As the deceased was aged about 40 years, to the

said notional income of Rs.6,000/- per month, 25% of the

same (Rs.1,500/-) would have to be added to the said

income as future prospects would be Rs.7,500/-.

7. Out of the said sum, 1/4th depending on the number

of dependents (Rs.1,875/-) would have to be deducted

towards personal expenses of the deceased. The net

income will be Rs.5,625/-.

8. As the deceased was aged 40 years, a multiplier of

'15' will have to be applied. Consequently, the claimants

would be entitled to a sum of Rs.10,12,500/-

(Rs.5,625x12x'15') towards "loss of dependency".

NC: 2024:KHC-K:6697

9. The claimants being the wife, children and parents of

the deceased, would each be entitled to a sum of

Rs.44,000/- towards "loss of consortium" i.e.,

Rs.2,20,000/- and they would also be entitled to a sum

of Rs.33,000/- under the "conventional heads".

10. Thus, the claimants, in modification of the impugned

award, would be entitled to the following sums:

      Sl.                                             Amount
               Heads of Compensation
      No.                                             (in Rs.)

      1.    Loss of Dependency                        10,12,500/-
      2.    Loss of Consortium                         2,20,000/-

      3.    Conventional Head                           33,000/-

                           Total                  12,65,500/-



11.    Thus,    the    claimants         would   be     entitled    for

compensation          of     Rs.12,65,500/-            as      against

Rs.7,80,000/- awarded by the Tribunal, along with interest

at the rate of six per cent per annum from the date of

petition till its realization.

NC: 2024:KHC-K:6697

12. The deposit and release of the enhanced

compensation amount by the owner of the tractor shall be

made as per the ratio adopted by the Tribunal.

The appeal is accordingly allowed in part.

Sd/-

(N.S.SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE

DHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter