Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shashikumar vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 22267 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22267 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Shashikumar vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2024

Author: Mohammad Nawaz

Bench: Mohammad Nawaz

                                           -1-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:35892
                                                 CRL.A No. 1275 of 2024




               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                    DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

                                      BEFORE
                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1275 OF 2024


               BETWEEN:

               SHASHIKUMAR
               S/O LAKSHMAIAH,
               AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
               R/AT NO.19, KOTHITOPU,
               TUMAKURU TOWN,
               TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572101.
                                                      ...APPELLANT
               (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K. A., ADVOCATE)

               AND:
Digitally
signed by      1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
YAMUNA K L          BY THE POLICE OF
Location:           TUMAKURU TOWN POLICE STATION,
High Court          TUMAKURU-572101.
of Karnataka        REPRESENTED BY SPP
                    HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                    BENGALURU-560001.

               2.   NARASIMHAMURTHY,
                    S/O NARASAIAH,
                    AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
                    R/AT WARD NO 23,
                    SATHYAMANGALA,
                    BIRANAKALLU ROAD,
                    TUMAKURU -572101.
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC:35892
                                   CRL.A No. 1275 of 2024




                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RANGSWAMY. R., HCGP FOR R1;
    SRI. RAJATH. H. V., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

     THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.14(A)(2) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 28.06.2024 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, TUMAKURU IN CRL.MISC.NO.943/2024 AND GANT
HIM BAIL IN CR.NO.230/2024 OF TUMAKURU TOWN
POLICE STATION, TUAMKURU NOW PENDING ON THE FILE
OF THE LEARNED III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, TUAMKURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/SU/
323, 307, 504, 506 OF IPC AND SEC.3(1)(r), 3(1)(s),
3(2)(v-a) OF SC/ST (POA) 2015.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:



CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ


                   ORAL JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel for appellant, learned High

Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1/State and

learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2/defacto

complainant/injured.

2. On a complaint lodged by respondent No.2, a

case was registered against the appellant/accused in

Crime No.230/2024 of Tumakuru town police station for

NC: 2024:KHC:35892

the offence punishable under Section 323, 307, 504, 506

of IPC and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v-a) of the

SC/ST(POA) amendment Act, 2015.

3. Appellant was arrested on 05.06.2024. He

preferred a petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. before

the Court of III Additional District and Sessions Judge at

Tumakuru, in Crl.Misc.Pet.No.943/2024. The said petition

was rejected vide order dated 28.06.2024.

4. The present appeal is preferred to set aside the

above order and to enlarge the appellant on bail.

5. It is alleged that accused was having an illicit

relationship with the wife of one Shivanna (CW.4). Hence,

CW.4 used to quarrel with his wife. He requested the

injured/CW.1 to provide him a separate house. The injured

had advised the accused not to have any relationship with

the wife of CW.4. In this background, on 02.06.2024 at

about 11:30 a.m., accused picked up quarrel with CW.1

and assaulted him with an intention to commit his murder

and caused grievous injuries to him.

NC: 2024:KHC:35892

6. As per complaint averments, the accused

assaulted the injured with a chopper on the forehead, back

of his head and also on the left cheek and when the

injured tried to evade the said blow, he sustained injuries

to his right hand thumb and on his left hand. The injured

was then shifted to District Government hospital,

Tumakuru for treatment.

7. Charge sheet has been filed wherein, it is

alleged that the accused has assaulted the injured with a

cement concrete stone which was lying on the ground, on

his head, face, etc. and also abused him in filthy language

referring to his caste etc.

8. As per wound certificate, the injured has

sustained multiple laceration injuries on the right of the

parietal and fore-finger region as well as injuries to his

face and forearm.

9. The learned counsel appearing for respondent

No.2 has contended that the injured has suffered facial

NC: 2024:KHC:35892

bone fracture. Injuries are grievous in nature and

therefore, he is not entitled for the relief of bail.

10. The learned High Court Government Pleader

contended that there is a prima-facie case against the

appellant and if he is enlarged on bail, he may tamper the

prosecution witnesses and also flee from justice.

11. The learned Sessions Judge has dismissed the

petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., observing that

there are prima-facie material to believe that the accused

has committed a serious offence and investigation is still

pending, the Investigation Officer has to record the

statement of eye witnesses and other witnesses.

12. Admittedly, now the investigation is completed

and charge sheet is filed. Injured has been discharged

from the hospital. As per the charge sheet, accused

assaulted the injured with a cement concrete stone which

was lying at the spot and not with a chopper as alleged in

the complaint .

NC: 2024:KHC:35892

13. Accused is already arrested and interrogated.

He is not required for further interrogation. Investigation is

completed and charge sheet is already filed. He has no

criminal antecedents. Hence, by imposing conditions, the

relief sought in this appeal can be granted.

14. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

i) Appeal is allowed.

ii) Order dated 28.06.2024 passed by the Court of

III Additional District and Sessions Judge at Tumakuru in

Crl.Misc.Pet.No.943/2024 is set aside.

iii) Appellant/accused is ordered to be released on

bail in Crime No.230/2024 of Tumakuru town police

station, pending in Spl.C.C.No.485/2024 on the file of the

Court of III Additional District and Sessions Judge

Tumakuru, subject to following conditions.

NC: 2024:KHC:35892

a) He shall execute a bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

              b)     He     shall   furnish        proof     of   his
       residential       address    and     shall     inform      the

Investigation Officer/Court, if there is change in the address.

c) He shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission of the learned session Judge.

              d)     He    shall    not    tamper          with   the
       prosecution        witnesses       either     directly      or
       indirectly.

              e)     He shall appear before the trial Court

on all dates of hearing without fail.

Sd/-

(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE

LDC

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter