Karnataka High Court
Tammanna vs Malsheteppa on 30 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:8026
RP No. 200016 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
REVIEW PETITION NO. 200016 OF 2024
IN
RSA NO:116/2008(DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
TAMMANNA
S/O PEERAPPA
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
DHANAMMA
W/O SIDRAMAPPA CHRISTIAN MALGI,
DIED BY HER LRS
1. SUDARSHAN
S/O SIDDRAMAPPA CHRISTIAN MALGI,
AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: MASTER.
2. SUJIT
Digitally signed S/O SIDDRAMAPPA CHRISTIAN MALGI,
by SWAPNA V
Location: high AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: MASTER,
court of BOTH R/O H.NO: 15-64,
karnataka NEAR BHAVANI TEMPLE ROAD,
CHITGUPPA, DIST: BIDAR - 585 412.
SHAMSUNDAR
S/O TAMMANNA
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
SHASHIKALA
W/O SHAMSUNDARHEGDE,
SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS
ALREADY ON RECORD AS
3. AJAY
S/O SHAMSUNDER HEGDE,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:8026
RP No. 200016 of 2024
AGE: MAJOR,
4. ABDANIGO
S/O SHAMSUNDAR HEGDE,
AGE: MAJOR,
ALL R/O JAI BHIMNAGAR,
CHANDAPUR, TQ: CHINCHOLI,
DIST: KALABURAGI - 585 307.
5. DHANPATI S/O TAMMANNA,
AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O KODAMBLE, TQ: HUMNABAD,
DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
6. GOKHALE S/O TAMMANNA,
AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O KODAMBLE, TQ: HUMNABAD,
DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
7. LALITABAI W/O AMBANNA,
AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O NANDAGAON, TQ: HUMNABAD,
DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
8. SHANTABAI D/O TAMMANNA,
AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O KODAMBLE, TQ: HUMNABAD,
DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
9. VIJAYKUMAR S/O TAMMANNA,
AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O KODAMBLE, TQ: HUMNABAD,
DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
10. SUREKHA D/O TAMMANNA,
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O KODAMBLE, TQ: HUMNABAD,
DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
11. RUKAMMA W/O TAMMANNA,
AGE: 81 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O KODAMBLE, TQ: HUMNABAD,
DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. M.A. JAGIRDAR, ADVOCATE)
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:8026
RP No. 200016 of 2024
AND:
MALSHETEPPA
S/O SAIBANNA PATIL
DIED BY LRS
1. SMT. PADMAVATI
W/O LATE MALSHETEPPA PATIL,
AGED ABOUT: 91 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O MUSTARI,
TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
2. CHANDRAKANT
S/O LATE MALSHETEPPA PATIL,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MUSTARI,
TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
3. VAIJANATH
S/O LATE MALSHETEPPA PATIL,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MUSTARI,
TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
4. VISHWNAATH
S/O LATE MALSHETEPPA PATIL,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MUSTARI,
TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
5. NOORANDAPPA
S/O LATE MALSHETEPPA PATIL,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MUSTARI,
TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
6. RAVI S/O LATE MALSHETEPPA PATIL,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MUSTARI,
TQ: HUMNABAD, DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
7. HEMAVATI
D/O LATE MALSHETEPPA PATIL,
W/O SOMSHEKER PATIL,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O OPP. TO MEGURE EYE HOSPITAL,
-4-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:8026
RP No. 200016 of 2024
NANDI COLONY, DIST: BIDAR - 585 330.
8. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BIDAR - 585 401.
9. THE TAHASILDAR
HUMNABAD,
DIST: BIDAR - 585 401.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ
WITH ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW ITS
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.12.2023 PASSED IN RSA
NO.116/2008 AND SET ASIDE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
ADTERD:30.07.2007 PASSED IN R.A.NO.09/1993 BY II ADDL.
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BASAVAKALYAN AND ALLOW THE RSA AS
PRAYED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent.
The order sheet dated 22.10.2024 reads as under:
" Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent.
No representation.
The petitioners has to satisfy about the
maintainability of the Review Petition. However, there
are office objections which are not yet complied with
inspite of matter listed for 4th time.
NC: 2024:KHC-K:8026
Hence, list finally as a last chance on
30.10.2024."
Inspite of that, there is no progress in the matter. Office
objections are not complied with even though the matter is
listed for 5th time.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of
office objections.
Sd/-
(M G UMA)
JUDGE
SPV
