Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Jagadeesh Basappa Hosamani vs Sri. Rakesh Singh
2024 Latest Caselaw 28008 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28008 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Jagadeesh Basappa Hosamani vs Sri. Rakesh Singh on 22 November, 2024

                                                -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:47854-DB
                                                            CCC No. 351 of 2024




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                            PRESENT

                           THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE

                                               AND

                              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

                                    CCC No. 351 OF 2024 (CIVIL)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   SRI. JAGADEESH BASAPPA HOSAMANI,
                        S/O BASAPPA NAGAPPA HOSAMANI,
                        AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
                        ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
                        KARNATAKA URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND
                        DRAINAGE BOARD SUB DIVISION,
                        GADAG, C/O A. JAIKUMAR,
                        VASUNDARA SKY SCAPE,
                        FF01, BLOCK-A, VALLABHANAGARA,
                        BIKAAJPURA, DODDALAKKASANDRA
                        KANAKAPURA ROAD,
                        BENGALURU-560095.
Digitally signed
by VALLI                                                          ...COMPLAINANT
MARIMUTHU          (BY SRI BALARAJ A. C., ADVOCATE)
Location: High
Court of           AND:
Karnataka
                   1.   SRI. RAKESH SINGH,
                        SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
                        DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
                        VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                        DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
                        BENGALURU-560001.

                   2.   SRI B. SHARATH,
                        MAJOR,
                        MANAGING DIRECTOR,
                        KARNATAKA URBAN WATER
                                -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC:47854-DB
                                            CCC No. 351 of 2024




     SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD,
     No.6, 1ST STAGE,
     1ST PHASE, BTM LAYOUT,
     BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD,
     BENGALURU-560029.
                                                ...ACCUSED
3.  STATE OF KARNATAKA,
    REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
    URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARMTENT,
    BENGALURU-01.
                                ...PROFORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR A1 AND R3;
SMT. SUMANGALA GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR A2)

     THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, BY THE COMPLAINANT PRAYING
TO INITIATE NECESSARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED
FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDERS PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE
COURT IN W.P.No.5165/2022 DATED 09.11.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A
AND TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

    THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:    HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
          N. V. ANJARIA
          and
          HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

                       ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. ARAVIND)

Heard learned advocate Mr. A.C. Balaraj for the complainant,

learned Additional Government Advocate Smt. Pramodhini Kishan

for respondent Nos.1 and 3 and learned advocate Smt. Sumangala

Gachchinamath for respondent No.2.

NC: 2024:KHC:47854-DB

2. This order brought in this contempt petition is the direction

in Writ Petition No.5165 of 2022 dated 09.11.2023.

3. Learned Single Judge issued direction to consider the

representation of the complainant in the context of a Government

order dated 17.10.2023.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the complainant submits

that the respondent authorities have breached the directions by its

non-compliance.

5. On service of notice, respondents have filed two affidavits.

Affidavit on behalf of respondent No.1 is affirmed by Secretary to

Government, Urban Development Department, Vikasa Soudha,

Bengaluru. The affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.2 is

affirmed by the Managing Director, Karnataka Urban Water Supply

and Drainage Board, Bengaluru. The affidavits and the annexed

documents would immediately reflect that the proceedings were

initiated to finalize seniority in the cadre of Assistant Executive

Engineers. The recommendations were made vide communications

dated 17.10.2023 and 19.01.2024. Aggrieved persons have

impugned the above recommendations in Writ Petition No.4723 of

NC: 2024:KHC:47854-DB

2024. In the said writ petition, interim directions are issued

restraining respondent No.2-Board from taking cognizance of the

recommendations.

6. In light of the above aspects, the respondents have purged

the contempt. It cannot be said that the respondents have

breached the directions.

7. The contempt petition would not survive for further

consideration. Accordingly disposed of.

The complainant is at liberty to pursue his remedies as

available in law. This Court does not express any opinion on

merits.

Sd/-

(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

VBS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter