Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27822 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:46981
CRL.RP No. 1456 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1456 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SHRI. K. R. MAHADEVA RAO
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
S/O. K. N. RAMOJI RAO,
R/AT NO.2218, NEAR URDU SCHOOL,
RANGAIAH NAIDU LAYOUT,
S. RAMESH ROAD, T. DASARAHALLI,
T. DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 057.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHARATHRAJ J., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M/S. MARUTHI MERCHANTS FINANCE COMPANY
Digitally signed by
DHARMALINGAM A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
Location: HIGH HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO. 4/1,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA SHOP NO.3, 1ST FLOOR,
K. K. ROAD, T. DASARAHALLI,
BENGALURU-560 057.
REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,
SRI. MANJAIAH. B. H. ,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
S/O. LATE HANUMAIAH.
2. SRI. MANJAIAH. B. H.
S/O. LATE HANUMAIAH,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:46981
CRL.RP No. 1456 of 2024
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
NO. 4/1, SHOP NO.3, 1ST FLOOR,
K.K. ROAD, T. DASARAHALLI,
BENGALURU-560 057.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS CRL.R.P. IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 438 R/W 442 BNNS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT
PASSED IN CRL. A.NO.204/2023 DATED 13/09/2024 BY THE LX
ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CCH 61
AND ALSO CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN C.C.NO.
1807/2019 DATED 10/01/2023 BY THE XXTH ADDL. CHIEF
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE
P/U/S 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
This criminal revision petition is filed by the
complainant challenging the order of acquittal passed by
the First Appellate Court while setting aside the order of
conviction recorded by the trial Magistrate. Against the
order of acquittal, appeal lies before this Court and not the
revision petition. Accordingly, the revision petition is
dismissed as revision is not maintainable.
NC: 2024:KHC:46981
2. However, the dismissal of the revision petition
shall not come in the way of the revision petitioner having
filed a duly constituted appeal. Time spent in the present
revision petition shall be excluded for the purpose of
computation of limitation under Section 14 of the
Limitation Act.
3. Office to return the certified copies, if any, after
taking the photocopies.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
DL CT: JL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!