Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27675 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:46917-DB
CCC No. 644 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
CCC NO. 644 OF 2024 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI HANUMAIAH
S/O LATE SANNAHANUMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/AT DASANAPURA VILLAGE,
POST AND HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 562 123
AND ALSO AT NO.35, 1st MAIN ROAD,
BEHIND SOCIETY ,
DASANAPURA
Digitally BENGALURU NORTH TALUK,
signed by BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 562 123.
PRABHAKAR
SWETHA ...COMPLAINANT
KRISHNAN (BY SRI H.L. NARENDRA BABU, ADVOCATE)
Location:
High Court AND:
of Karnataka
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGAULRU - 560 001.
...PRO FORMA RESPONDENT
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:46917-DB
CCC No. 644 of 2024
2. SRI DAYANANDA K.A.
WORKING AS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BANGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
3. SRI VIJAY KUMAR R
WORKING AS THASILDAR
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK,
KANDHAYA BHAVANA ,
K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
...ACCUSED
(BY SMT. PRATHIMA HONNAPURA, AAG A/W
SRI K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE
RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED FOR HAVING DELIBERATELY AND
INTENTIONALLY DISOBEYED THE ORDER DATED 05.04.2024
PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.8793/2024
(KLR-RR-SUR).
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:46917-DB
CCC No. 644 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
N. V. ANJARIA
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr. H.L. Narendra Babu for the
complainant stated that the directions in the order brought under
contempt is complied with as the endorsement is issued, deciding
the representation.
In view of the above, the contempt petition is accordingly
disposed of.
Liberty is reserved for the complainant to institute
independent proceedings, if the complainant intends to challenge
the endorsement on merits. This Court, however, does not express
any opinion on merits in that regard.
Sd/-
(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!